PULSE
FEED
CVE Watch406,443 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,443en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,566
  • Alto
    21,522
  • Medio
    20,094
  • Bajo
    2,095
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades13,881–13,920 · 406,443
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2007-5728—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2014-8791—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2000-0053—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2022-3142—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2010-1489—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2017-3528—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2006-3510—
96.7%
——29——
CVE-2014-4170—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2006-26567.5 SIN
96.6%
——29Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.40d
CVE-2017-11781—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2011-1997—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2005-2878—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2025-0317—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2017-3042—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2024-45607—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2011-1868—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2019-7666—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2006-5567—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2006-2362—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2008-0296—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2022-20650—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2001-0815—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2018-8316—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2022-22835—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2011-3496—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2001-0089—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2006-6902—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2023-44693—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2018-8459—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2008-4762—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2021-3958—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2019-3462—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2010-3327—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2018-13056.5 MED
96.6%
——29Security constraints defined by annotations of Servlets in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.4, 8.5.0 to 8.5.27, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.49 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.84 were only applied once a Servlet had been loaded. Because security constraints defined in this way apply to the URL pattern and any URLs below that point, it was possible - depending on the order Servlets were loaded - for some security constraints not to be applied. This could have exposed resources to users who were not authorised to access them.18d
CVE-2017-17428—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-1999-1241—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2013-0984—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2023-47248—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2019-8044—
96.6%
——29——
CVE-2014-8722—
96.6%
——29——