PULSE
FEED
ransomakira reclama a Krishnanransomakira reclama a Erowa · CH · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Company #132 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #131 · DEransomn0n reclama a Company #130 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #129 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #128 · USransomrhysida reclama a Juge, Napolitano, Ruli, Putfark & Pittman · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a gWorks · US · Otherransompear reclama a Palm Vascular Centers · US · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a sigsauer.com · US · Manufacturingransomdoommageddon reclama a ASLAN TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON San.ve Tic. A.Ş. · TR · Manufacturingransombyod reclama a IHG Hotels & Resorts (Estate) · GB · Hospitalityransomaoqin reclama a SILIKO d.o.o. · SI · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Krishnanransomakira reclama a Erowa · CH · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Company #132 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #131 · DEransomn0n reclama a Company #130 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #129 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #128 · USransomrhysida reclama a Juge, Napolitano, Ruli, Putfark & Pittman · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a gWorks · US · Otherransompear reclama a Palm Vascular Centers · US · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a sigsauer.com · US · Manufacturingransomdoommageddon reclama a ASLAN TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON San.ve Tic. A.Ş. · TR · Manufacturingransombyod reclama a IHG Hotels & Resorts (Estate) · GB · Hospitalityransomaoqin reclama a SILIKO d.o.o. · SI · Manufacturing
CVE Watch407,791 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

407,791en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,767
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,662
  • Alto
    22,135
  • Medio
    20,649
  • Bajo
    2,175
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades15,761–15,800 · 407,791
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2007-1535—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2000-0745—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-0948—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2024-5458—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-3681—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2004-2292—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2021-22784—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-14955—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2021-43883—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-4399—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-15705—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2003-0826—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-3155—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-07345.9 MED
96.2%
——29The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).27d
CVE-2021-25899—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2025-2172—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2002-0826—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-58875.0 SIN
96.2%
——29The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly check for stale nonce values in conjunction with enforcement of proper credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests.26d
CVE-2020-8641—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-8007—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-1999-0696—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-4902—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-2165—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-1999-0006—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-5689—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2014-1849—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-3678—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2023-38667.5 ALT
96.2%
——29In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate session id and tree id in the compound request This patch validate session id and tree id in compound request. If first operation in the compound is SMB2 ECHO request, ksmbd bypass session and tree validation. So work->sess and work->tcon could be NULL. If secound request in the compound access work->sess or tcon, It cause NULL pointer dereferecing error.92d
CVE-2011-1541—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2009-2983—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-5406—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-3140—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-3680—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-1551—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2022-27786—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-4147—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2013-4863—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2020-5724—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-5286—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-3076—
96.2%
——29——