PULSE
FEED
ransomakira reclama a Krishnanransomakira reclama a Erowa · CH · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Company #132 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #131 · DEransomn0n reclama a Company #130 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #129 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #128 · USransomrhysida reclama a Juge, Napolitano, Ruli, Putfark & Pittman · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a gWorks · US · Otherransompear reclama a Palm Vascular Centers · US · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a sigsauer.com · US · Manufacturingransomdoommageddon reclama a ASLAN TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON San.ve Tic. A.Ş. · TR · Manufacturingransombyod reclama a IHG Hotels & Resorts (Estate) · GB · Hospitalityransomaoqin reclama a SILIKO d.o.o. · SI · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Krishnanransomakira reclama a Erowa · CH · Manufacturingransomn0n reclama a Company #132 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #131 · DEransomn0n reclama a Company #130 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #129 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #128 · USransomrhysida reclama a Juge, Napolitano, Ruli, Putfark & Pittman · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a gWorks · US · Otherransompear reclama a Palm Vascular Centers · US · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a sigsauer.com · US · Manufacturingransomdoommageddon reclama a ASLAN TEKSTİL ve KONFEKSİYON San.ve Tic. A.Ş. · TR · Manufacturingransombyod reclama a IHG Hotels & Resorts (Estate) · GB · Hospitalityransomaoqin reclama a SILIKO d.o.o. · SI · Manufacturing
CVE Watch407,791 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

407,791en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,767
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,662
  • Alto
    22,135
  • Medio
    20,649
  • Bajo
    2,175
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades15,801–15,840 · 407,791
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2019-1244—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2002-1671—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2014-2617—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2020-15994—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-3046—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-18580—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-19040—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-3289—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-2394—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-5406—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2022-27786—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2006-5448—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2025-2172—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2021-22654—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2020-15500—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2005-2661—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-0295—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2021-25899—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2025-536797.2 ALT
96.2%
——29An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 24.1, FortiSandbox Cloud 23 all versions allows a remote privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.27d
CVE-2019-0605—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-58875.0 SIN
96.2%
——29The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly check for stale nonce values in conjunction with enforcement of proper credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests.26d
CVE-2000-0597—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-14955—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2003-0801—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-4399—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-9675—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2011-1541—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-1551—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-1999-1539—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2020-8641—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-3056—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2016-10718—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2001-0829—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-3679—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2024-5458—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-1860—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-3680—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2022-24082—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-9024—
96.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-3140—
96.2%
——29——