Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy
413,525en la vista actual
Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.
En catálogo KEV1,779
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707
Distribución · última ventana
- Crítico5,739
- Alto22,705
- Medio21,205
- Bajo2,175
Filtros
Ventana
Severidad
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2017-11879—95.5%
——29——CVE-2010-0887—95.5%
——29——CVE-2010-3490—95.5%
——29——CVE-2025-138787.5 ALT95.5%
——29Malformed BRID/HHIT records can cause `named` to terminate unexpectedly.
This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.40 through 9.18.43, 9.20.13 through 9.20.17, 9.21.12 through 9.21.16, 9.18.40-S1 through 9.18.43-S1, and 9.20.13-S1 through 9.20.17-S1.72dCVE-2005-1052—95.5%
——29——CVE-2021-445335.3 MED95.5%
——29Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.34dCVE-2016-2112—95.5%
——29——CVE-2015-1639—95.5%
——29——CVE-2019-19785.8 MED95.5%
——29A vulnerability in the stream reassembly component of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software, Cisco FirePOWER Services Software for ASA, and Cisco Firepower Management Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass filtering protections. The vulnerability is due to improper reassembly of traffic streams. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted streams through an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to bypass filtering and deliver malicious requests to protected systems that would otherwise be blocked.92dCVE-2022-36962—95.5%
——29——CVE-2024-12342—95.5%
——29——CVE-2015-5600—95.5%
——29——CVE-2020-11897—95.5%
——29——CVE-2024-26229—95.5%
——29——CVE-2015-8415—95.5%
——29——CVE-2017-11786—95.5%
——29——CVE-2010-2931—95.5%
——29——CVE-2019-3497—95.5%
——29——CVE-2020-10881—95.5%
——29——CVE-2018-4306—95.5%
——29——CVE-2018-4317—95.5%
——29——CVE-2007-2885—95.5%
——29——CVE-2020-15418—95.5%
——29——CVE-2010-2507—95.5%
——29——CVE-2007-1199—95.5%
——29——CVE-2019-9641—95.5%
——29——CVE-2018-4318—95.5%
——29——CVE-2014-8446—95.5%
——29——CVE-2009-0072—95.5%
——29——CVE-2004-2631—95.5%
——29——CVE-2015-3203—95.5%
——29——CVE-2022-2136—95.5%
——29——CVE-2015-2862—95.5%
——29——CVE-2019-11677—95.5%
——29——CVE-2024-29272—95.5%
——29——CVE-2025-32102—95.5%
——29——CVE-2012-0981—95.5%
——29——CVE-2001-1452—95.5%
——29——CVE-2018-16021—95.5%
——29——CVE-2014-8448—95.5%
——29——