PULSE
FEED
ransommedusalocker reclama a Depransomplay reclama a Minor League Baseball · US · Hospitalityransomn0n reclama a Company #213 · QAransomn0n reclama a Company #212 · ETransomdoommageddon reclama a K**** T**** H**** B****ransomcurious worm reclama a sacheminc.com · CA · Manufacturingransomcurious worm reclama a sbhny.org · USransomcurious worm reclama a shannonhealth.com · IE · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a baronandbudd.com · GB · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a ki*****o.comransomcurious worm reclama a raleighortho.com · US · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a lifelinescreening.com · US · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a safcodental.com · SA · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a marquiscompanies.com · US · Professional Servicesransommedusalocker reclama a Depransomplay reclama a Minor League Baseball · US · Hospitalityransomn0n reclama a Company #213 · QAransomn0n reclama a Company #212 · ETransomdoommageddon reclama a K**** T**** H**** B****ransomcurious worm reclama a sacheminc.com · CA · Manufacturingransomcurious worm reclama a sbhny.org · USransomcurious worm reclama a shannonhealth.com · IE · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a baronandbudd.com · GB · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a ki*****o.comransomcurious worm reclama a raleighortho.com · US · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a lifelinescreening.com · US · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a safcodental.com · SA · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a marquiscompanies.com · US · Professional Services
CVE Watch413,525 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

413,525en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,779
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,739
  • Alto
    22,705
  • Medio
    21,204
  • Bajo
    2,175
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades19,161–19,200 · 413,525
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-327487.5 ALT
95.4%
——29Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Prior to version 7.5, due to premature release of resource during expected lifetime and heap Use-After-Free bugs, Squid is vulnerable to Denial of Service when handling ICP traffic. This problem allows a remote attacker to perform a reliable and repeatable Denial of Service attack against the Squid service using ICP protocol. This attack is limited to Squid deployments that explicitly enable ICP support (i.e. configure non-zero `icp_port`). This problem _cannot_ be mitigated by denying ICP queries using `icp_access` rules. This bug is fixed in Squid version 7.5.120d
CVE-2012-5285—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2010-3914—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-5037—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2019-7095—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2016-1558—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2019-5788—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-2419—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2020-8265—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2005-3670—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2026-335267.5 ALT
95.4%
——29Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Prior to version 7.5, due to heap Use-After-Free, Squid is vulnerable to Denial of Service when handling ICP traffic. This problem allows a remote attacker to perform a reliable and repeatable Denial of Service attack against the Squid service using ICP protocol. This attack is limited to Squid deployments that explicitly enable ICP support (i.e. configure non-zero `icp_port`). This problem _cannot_ be mitigated by denying ICP queries using `icp_access` rules. Version 7.5 contains a patch.120d
CVE-2025-53833—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2013-43224.3 SIN
95.4%
——29Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 processes chunked transfer coding without properly handling (1) a large total amount of chunked data or (2) whitespace characters in an HTTP header value within a trailer field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by streaming data. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-3544.33d
CVE-2002-1641—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2013-4096—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-10063—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-1999-0669—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2003-0044—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-0037—
95.3%
——29——
CVE-2009-0813—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2003-0253—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-0826—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-0047—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-45672—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-4971—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2020-1374—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2020-3878—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2003-1396—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2016-0729—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2016-2381—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2013-4338—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2024-13974—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2015-0324—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-25434—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-4974—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2025-7776—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2015-5300—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-6184—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2023-30256—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2017-2971—
95.4%
——29——