PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch413,805 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

413,805en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,779
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,601
  • Alto
    22,481
  • Medio
    20,829
  • Bajo
    2,126
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades27,801–27,840 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2005-2639—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-3673—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2010-0112—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-6964—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2003-1142—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2007-2820—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2022-32092—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2009-2820—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2008-3234—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2009-3245—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2008-6897—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2014-5077—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2023-22653—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2020-116208.1 ALT
93.2%
——28FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.Embedded (aka commons-jelly).35d
CVE-2009-4964—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2006-3198—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-8404—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-8067—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2019-13511—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-8402—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2017-13792—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2007-0741—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2001-1321—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2006-6106—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2008-0882—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2018-204067.5 ALT
93.2%
——28Modules/_pickle.c in Python before 3.7.1 has an integer overflow via a large LONG_BINPUT value that is mishandled during a "resize to twice the size" attempt. This issue might cause memory exhaustion, but is only relevant if the pickle format is used for serializing tens or hundreds of gigabytes of data. This issue is fixed in: v3.4.10, v3.4.10rc1; v3.5.10, v3.5.10rc1, v3.5.7, v3.5.7rc1, v3.5.8, v3.5.8rc1, v3.5.8rc2, v3.5.9; v3.6.10, v3.6.10rc1, v3.6.11, v3.6.11rc1, v3.6.12, v3.6.7, v3.6.7rc1, v3.6.7rc2, v3.6.8, v3.6.8rc1, v3.6.9, v3.6.9rc1; v3.7.1, v3.7.1rc1, v3.7.1rc2, v3.7.2, v3.7.2rc1, v3.7.3, v3.7.3rc1, v3.7.4, v3.7.4rc1, v3.7.4rc2, v3.7.5, v3.7.5rc1, v3.7.6, v3.7.6rc1, v3.7.7, v3.7.7rc1, v3.7.8, v3.7.8rc1, v3.7.9.28d
CVE-2015-8066—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-8068—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2013-0170—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2020-3742—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2009-3575—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-8070—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-8062—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2017-11801—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2024-44349—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2005-4470—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-1999-1279—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2007-5446—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2007-5309—
93.2%
——28——
CVE-2014-8626—
93.2%
——28——