PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Kayaku Safety Systems Malaysia Sdn Bhd · MY · Manufacturingransomscarlettgroup reclama a fittleworth.com · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransombarracuda reclama a FINSA · ES · Financial Servicesransomnetrunner reclama a F***** G****** C********** C*** · USransomendzone reclama a Momentum Telecom · Technologyransomendzone reclama a Absolute Bail Bonds · US · Financial Servicesransomeverest reclama a Grundbaulabor Trier GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomnetrunner reclama a I****** A***** · KWransominterlock reclama a K&A Industries · USransomeverest reclama a Final Notice Before Publication · Otherransompanzer reclama a RE/MAX Germany · DE · Professional Servicesransomcurious worm reclama a i*t*r***t.com · Technologyransomcurious worm reclama a t**a.comransomplay reclama a Frey Properties of Highland LLC · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Kayaku Safety Systems Malaysia Sdn Bhd · MY · Manufacturingransomscarlettgroup reclama a fittleworth.com · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransombarracuda reclama a FINSA · ES · Financial Servicesransomnetrunner reclama a F***** G****** C********** C*** · USransomendzone reclama a Momentum Telecom · Technologyransomendzone reclama a Absolute Bail Bonds · US · Financial Servicesransomeverest reclama a Grundbaulabor Trier GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomnetrunner reclama a I****** A***** · KWransominterlock reclama a K&A Industries · USransomeverest reclama a Final Notice Before Publication · Otherransompanzer reclama a RE/MAX Germany · DE · Professional Servicesransomcurious worm reclama a i*t*r***t.com · Technologyransomcurious worm reclama a t**a.comransomplay reclama a Frey Properties of Highland LLC · US · Retail & E-Commerce
CVE Watch414,784 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

414,784en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,781
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,709

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,286
  • Alto
    20,850
  • Medio
    19,534
  • Bajo
    2,048
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades32,121–32,160 · 414,784
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2011-4788—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2019-5600—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2020-9679—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2006-1413—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2017-2810—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2020-14048—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2026-2118—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2007-1393—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2026-54228.1 ALT
92.2%
——28A path traversal vulnerability exists in jupyter-server version 2.17.0 due to an incorrect root directory boundary check in the _get_os_path() function within jupyter_server/services/contents/fileio.py. The check uses startswith(root) without appending a trailing path separator, allowing sibling directories with names starting with the same prefix as root_dir to bypass the check. Additionally, the to_os_path() function in utils.py does not strip ".." from path parts, enabling traversal sequences to bypass the vulnerable check. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized read/write access to files in sibling directories, potentially exposing sensitive data in shared hosting environments.115d
CVE-2017-4918—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2019-3804—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2012-1336—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2022-32270—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2022-1001—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2007-6353—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2014-2879—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-7019—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-7539—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-3089—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2014-9612—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2010-4479—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2020-16845—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2021-29641—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2025-29794—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2017-3073—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2017-7219—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2018-5315—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2019-3463—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2015-0302—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2005-4417—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-7007—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2025-7382—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2018-6188—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-6646—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2016-7018—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2023-40057—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2022-22946—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2014-2614—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2002-0133—
92.2%
——28——
CVE-2008-0986—
92.2%
——28——