Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy
367,284en la vista actual
Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.
En catálogo KEV1,687
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629
Distribución · última ventana
- Crítico2,311
- Alto9,414
- Medio5,381
- Bajo529
Ventana
Severidad
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2025-8119—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-26708—2.8%
——1——CVE-2022-32610—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-179973.1 BAJ2.8%
——1Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)29dCVE-2025-32281—2.8%
——1——CVE-2021-39664—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-645327.8 ALT2.8%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: bound NTFS_DE view.data_off in UpdateRecordData{Root,Allocation}
In do_action()'s UpdateRecordDataRoot (fslog.c:3489) and
UpdateRecordDataAllocation (fslog.c:3697) cases, the memmove
destination is `Add2Ptr(e, le16_to_cpu(e->view.data_off))`,
where e->view.data_off comes from an on-disk NTFS_DE inside
an INDEX_ROOT or INDEX_BUFFER. Neither case validates
view.data_off + dlen against e->size; the existing
check_if_index_root / check_if_alloc_index helpers walk the
entry chain and validate the entry's offset, but not its
internal view fields.
The neighbouring read sites (e.g., fs/ntfs3/index.c when
iterating view entries) check view.data_off + view.data_size
<= e->size. Apply the same bound at the two memmove sites.
Reproduced under UML+KASAN on mainline 8d90b09e6741 via
pr_warn-only probe instrumentation: with view.data_off forced
to 0xFFFC, the memmove writes 32 bytes past the end of the
NTFS_DE.
This is similar in shape to Pavitra Jha's 2026-05-02 patch
"fs/ntfs3: prevent oob in case UpdateRecordDataRoot"
(<20260502105008.21827-1-jhapavitra98@gmail.com>) which
proposes calling ntfs3_bad_de_range(); that helper does not
exist in mainline. This patch uses inline checks.16dCVE-2026-187557.3 ALT2.8%
——1A DLL hijacking vulnerability in GeoVision GV-ASManager allows a local attacker with write access to an unsafe search directory to execute arbitrary code. By placing a crafted dynamic-link library (DLL) file into the application search path prior to the legitimate library, the malicious code is loaded and executed under the security privileges of the GV-ASManager process.28dCVE-2025-71287—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-45175—2.8%
——1——CVE-2024-5912—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-772197.1 ALT2.8%
——1GNU Emacs before 31.0.91 contains an integer overflow in the PBM/PPM/PGM image loader that allows an attacker to leak heap memory contents by supplying a crafted image with large dimensions and an elevated max color index. The image loader multiplies image dimensions and channel count using signed integer arithmetic; for sufficiently large values, the result wraps to a negative number, bypassing the bounds check and causing the pixel reader to access heap memory past the end of the allocated buffer. The over-read contents are interpreted as pixel color values and rendered on screen.11dCVE-2025-24005—2.8%
——1——CVE-2024-0139—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-2539—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-4410—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-8708—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-54059—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-46005—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-4732—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-7614—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-31567—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-25179—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-57892—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-4731—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-21111—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-6710—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-23291—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-4143—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-55041—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-58865—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-610777.5 ALT2.8%
——1Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Mobile Inventory Management product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Mobile Inventory Management executes to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Mobile Inventory Management. While the vulnerability is in PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Mobile Inventory Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Mobile Inventory Management accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all PeopleSoft Enterprise SCM Mobile Inventory Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).26dCVE-2025-8476—2.8%
——1——CVE-2025-24334—2.8%
——1——CVE-2018-25287—2.8%
——1——CVE-2021-0703—2.8%
——1——CVE-2024-28974—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-49263—2.8%
——1Capstone is a disassembly framework. Prior to version 6.0.0-Alpha9, Capstone's WebAssembly backend accepts attacker-controlled raw WASM instruction bytes through the public `cs_disasm()` and `cs_disasm_iter()` APIs. For a large but well-formed `br_table` instruction, the WASM decoder accumulates the immediate length in a wider local variable but returns it through a `uint16_t` instruction-size path. When the encoded instruction length is exactly 65,536 bytes, the size wraps to zero and `cs_disasm()` can repeatedly decode the same instruction without advancing. For larger lengths, `cs_disasm_iter()` advances into the middle of the `br_table` payload and decodes target bytes as subsequent instructions. This is an availability and parser-integrity issue. Version 6.0.0-Alpha9 patches the issue.15dCVE-2023-26299—2.8%
——1——CVE-2026-89094.3 MED2.8%
——1The WpMobi plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handleSaveGeneralSettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's General Settings and inject arbitrary web scripts into the administrator's browser via the unescaped app_name attribute reflection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The injected script executes even when the supplied app_name value fails validation and is not persisted to the database, because the form is re-rendered with the attacker-supplied in-memory value on validation failure.41d