Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy
367,284en la vista actual
Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.
En catálogo KEV1,685
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629
Distribución · última ventana
- Crítico2,295
- Alto9,356
- Medio5,355
- Bajo528
Ventana
Severidad
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-64206.3 MED2.1%
——1A flaw was found in Keylime. An attacker with root access on an enrolled monitored machine, where the Keylime agent runs, can exploit a vulnerability in the Keylime verifier. The verifier uses a hardcoded challenge nonce for Trusted Platform Module (TPM) quote attestation instead of a cryptographically random value. This allows the attacker to stockpile valid TPM quotes and replay them to evade detection after compromising the system. This issue affects only the push model deployment.6dCVE-2026-43356—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-43004—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-234365.5 MED2.1%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: shaper: protect from late creation of hierarchy
We look up a netdev during prep of Netlink ops (pre- callbacks)
and take a ref to it. Then later in the body of the callback
we take its lock or RCU which are the actual protections.
The netdev may get unregistered in between the time we take
the ref and the time we lock it. We may allocate the hierarchy
after flush has already run, which would lead to a leak.
Take the instance lock in pre- already, this saves us from the race
and removes the need for dedicated lock/unlock callbacks completely.
After all, if there's any chance of write happening concurrently
with the flush - we're back to leaking the hierarchy.
We may take the lock for devices which don't support shapers but
we're only dealing with SET operations here, not taking the lock
would be optimizing for an error case.39dCVE-2026-43285—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-31783—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-45966—2.1%
——1——CVE-2025-10222—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-43367—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-43294—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-580877.8 ALT2.1%
——1The GETALL and SETALL commands in semctl(2) recorded the number of semaphores in the target set, dropped the lock protecting the set, allocated a buffer sized for that count, and reacquired the lock. A sequence-number check was used to verify that the set had not been replaced in the interim, but the sequence number wraps after 0x8000 create/destroy cycles. By rapidly destroying and recreating semaphore sets at the same index, another process can cause the sequence number to wrap, allowing a set with a different number of semaphores to pass validation. The subsequent copy then reads or writes past the end of the allocated buffer.
An unprivileged local user can trigger out-of-bounds reads and writes on kernel heap memory, potentially leading to privilege escalation.19hCVE-2026-467497.5 ALT2.1%
——1A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The affected application uses a password hashing implementation with a static, hardcoded salt shared across all users and installations, and is configured with an insufficient number of iterations. This could allow an attacker to efficiently recover user passwords using brute-force or precomputed attacks, potentially resulting in unauthorized access.40dCVE-2026-31621—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-234305.5 MED2.1%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Don't overwrite KMS surface dirty tracker
We were overwriting the surface's dirty tracker here causing a memory leak.39dCVE-2026-645757.8 ALT2.1%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: tcp: fix double sock release on batch realloc
bpf_iter_tcp_batch() releases the current batch via
bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(), which drops the socket refs and rewrites
each slot with the socket cookie, then grows the batch. cur_sk/end_sk
are kept for bpf_iter_tcp_resume(), but on realloc failure the function
returns ERR_PTR() before resume runs, leaving cur_sk < end_sk over
slots that now hold cookies rather than sock pointers.
bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop() then calls bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch() again and
dereferences a cookie as a struct sock.
Empty the batch on the failure path so stop() does not release it
again. The sockets were already freed by the first
bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(), so nothing leaks, and a later read() rescans
the bucket from the start instead of skipping it. The sibling
GFP_NOWAIT failure path still holds real socket references and is left
for stop() to release.
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in __sock_gen_cookie
Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000059 by task exploit
...
__sock_gen_cookie (net/core/sock_diag.c:28)
bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2918)
bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:3270)
bpf_seq_read (kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c:205)
vfs_read (fs/read_write.c:572)
ksys_read (fs/read_write.c:716)
do_syscall_64
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception13dCVE-2026-43321—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-45953—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-0502—2.1%
——1——CVE-2025-12413—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-31784—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-31673—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-31443—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-745808.8 ALT2.1%
——1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vhost: reset the vring metadata cache on vring reconfiguration
vq->meta_iotlb[] caches the vhost_iotlb_map that backs each vring
metadata region, and iotlb_access_ok() returns early on a cache hit,
taking the hit as proof that the region has already been validated:
if (vhost_vq_meta_fetch(vq, addr, len, type))
return true;
The cache is reset on VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE and VHOST_IOTLB_INVALIDATE, on
device IOTLB (re)initialisation and on vq reset, but not when
VHOST_SET_VRING_ADDR replaces vq->desc, vq->avail and vq->used, nor when
VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM changes the region sizes.
With a device IOTLB attached both ioctls are accepted while the vq is
live, and neither validates the addresses at ioctl time: vq_access_ok()
and vq_log_used_access_ok() return true early because the addresses are
GIOVAs, deferring validation to prefetch time. Once the cache has been
populated that deferred validation no longer runs -- vq_meta_prefetch()
hits the stale entry and returns true -- and vhost_vq_meta_fetch() keeps
translating through the old mapping as
map->addr + addr - map->start
for an address the mapping no longer covers. vhost_copy_to_user() and
vhost_copy_from_user() consume the result with __copy_to_user() and
__copy_from_user(), which do not check it either, so a subsequent used
ring update or descriptor fetch accesses memory outside the region the
IOTLB actually maps.
Reset the metadata cache whenever the vring is reconfigured, so the new
addresses are pushed back through iotlb_access_ok()'s slow path.7dCVE-2026-31734—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-704354.2 MED2.1%
——1A missing permission check in Jenkins SCM-Manager Plugin 1.11.1 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.14hCVE-2026-31760—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-43476—2.1%
——1——CVE-2025-58097—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-46087—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-102673.3 BAJ2.1%
——1A security flaw has been discovered in janet-lang janet up to 1.41.0. This affects the function doframe of the file src/core/debug.c. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The patch is named ed17dd2c5913a23fb1107251e44a9410a3c30cf5.41dCVE-2026-31683—2.1%
——1——CVE-2025-71290—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-31537—2.1%
——1——CVE-2022-20441—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-46141—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-46118—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-23299—2.1%
——1——CVE-2022-48381—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-28993—2.1%
——1——CVE-2026-20728—2.1%
——1Protection mechanism failure for some Intel Extension for TensorFlow software before version 2.15.0.3 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.20d