PULSE
EN VIVO0señales / 24h
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2023-49105 — ownCloud / ownCloudvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53362 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-66384 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2021-23758 — Ajax.NET Professional / Ajax.NET ProfessionalvulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-3246 — Red Hat / LibuservulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-5287 — Red Hat / Automatic Bug Reporting ToolvulnKEV agrega CVE-2022-0995 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-8452 — Citrix / NetScaler ADC and NetScaler GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2019-1068 — Microsoft / SQL ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-60004 — Gitea / GiteavulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-21962 — Oracle / HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-invulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-73570 — Synacor / Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72530 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72529 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2023-49105 — ownCloud / ownCloudvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-53362 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-66384 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2021-23758 — Ajax.NET Professional / Ajax.NET ProfessionalvulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-3246 — Red Hat / LibuservulnKEV agrega CVE-2015-5287 — Red Hat / Automatic Bug Reporting ToolvulnKEV agrega CVE-2022-0995 — Linux / KernelvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-8452 — Citrix / NetScaler ADC and NetScaler GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2019-1068 — Microsoft / SQL ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-60004 — Gitea / GiteavulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-21962 — Oracle / HTTP Server and Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-invulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-73570 — Synacor / Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72530 — TrueConf / ServervulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-72529 — TrueConf / Server
CVE Watch367,284 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

367,284en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,685
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,629

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    2,295
  • Alto
    9,356
  • Medio
    5,355
  • Bajo
    528
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades359,201–359,240 · 367,284
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2024-51528
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-2984
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-39121
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-314215.5 MED
2.0%
1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: cls_fw: fix NULL pointer dereference on shared blocks The old-method path in fw_classify() calls tcf_block_q() and dereferences q->handle. Shared blocks leave block->q NULL, causing a NULL deref when an empty cls_fw filter is attached to a shared block and a packet with a nonzero major skb mark is classified. Reject the configuration in fw_change() when the old method (no TCA_OPTIONS) is used on a shared block, since fw_classify()'s old-method path needs block->q which is NULL for shared blocks. The fixed null-ptr-deref calling stack: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000038-0x000000000000003f] RIP: 0010:fw_classify (net/sched/cls_fw.c:81) Call Trace: tcf_classify (./include/net/tc_wrapper.h:197 net/sched/cls_api.c:1764 net/sched/cls_api.c:1860) tc_run (net/core/dev.c:4401) __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4535 net/core/dev.c:4790)49d
CVE-2026-231005.5 MED
2.0%
1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix hugetlb_pmd_shared() Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl. using mmu_gather)", v3. One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related comment fixes. I cleaned up my prototype I recently shared [1] for the performance fix, deferring most of the cleanups I had in the prototype to a later point. While doing that I identified the other things. The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly" easily. At least patch #1 and #4. Patch #1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing Patch #2 + #3 are simple comment fixes that patch #4 interacts with. Patch #4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit(). The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather. Read: complicated There are plenty of cleanups in the future to be had + one reasonable optimization on x86. But that's all out of scope for this series. Runtime tested, with a focus on fixing the performance regression using the original reproducer [2] on x86. This patch (of 4): We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared count. Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding speculative references) and instead use ptdesc->pt_share_count to identify sharing. We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never detect a shared PMD table as such, because sharing/unsharing no longer touches the refcount of a PMD table. Page migration, like mbind() or migrate_pages() would allow for migrating folios mapped into such shared PMD tables, even though the folios are not exclusive. In smaps we would account them as "private" although they are "shared", and we would be wrongly setting the PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE in the pagemap interface. Fix it by properly using ptdesc_pmd_is_shared() in hugetlb_pmd_shared().49d
CVE-2025-384777.8 ALT
2.0%
1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: sch_qfq: Fix race condition on qfq_aggregate A race condition can occur when 'agg' is modified in qfq_change_agg (called during qfq_enqueue) while other threads access it concurrently. For example, qfq_dump_class may trigger a NULL dereference, and qfq_delete_class may cause a use-after-free. This patch addresses the issue by: 1. Moved qfq_destroy_class into the critical section. 2. Added sch_tree_lock protection to qfq_dump_class and qfq_dump_class_stats.33d
CVE-2025-21050
2.0%
1
CVE-2023-53591
2.0%
1
CVE-2021-39768
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-39124
2.0%
1
CVE-2021-0646
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-33572
2.0%
1
CVE-2020-37102
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-20893
2.0%
1
CVE-2018-25313
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-22075
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-31648
2.0%
1
CVE-2025-39925
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-22089
2.0%
1
CVE-2023-32449
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-42328
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-750555.5 MED
2.0%
1In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.2.1 hadoop ResourceManager could read local files via XXE3d
CVE-2020-0357
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-39103
2.0%
1
CVE-2025-21005
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-22074
2.0%
1
CVE-2025-66061
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-23703
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-456245.1 MED
2.0%
1ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-47 and 7.1.2-22, when performing a polynomial distortion an out of bounds over-read of 24 bytes can occur when specifying specific arguments. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-47 and 7.1.2-22.40d
CVE-2021-39738
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-22066
2.0%
1
CVE-2025-14376
2.0%
1
CVE-2023-529347.8 ALT
2.0%
1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/MADV_COLLAPSE: catch !none !huge !bad pmd lookups In commit 34488399fa08 ("mm/madvise: add file and shmem support to MADV_COLLAPSE") we make the following change to find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(): - if (!pmd_present(pmde)) - return SCAN_PMD_NULL; + if (pmd_none(pmde)) + return SCAN_PMD_NONE; This was for-use by MADV_COLLAPSE file/shmem codepaths, where MADV_COLLAPSE might identify a pte-mapped hugepage, only to have khugepaged race-in, free the pte table, and clear the pmd. Such codepaths include: A) If we find a suitably-aligned compound page of order HPAGE_PMD_ORDER already in the pagecache. B) In retract_page_tables(), if we fail to grab mmap_lock for the target mm/address. In these cases, collapse_pte_mapped_thp() really does expect a none (not just !present) pmd, and we want to suitably identify that case separate from the case where no pmd is found, or it's a bad-pmd (of course, many things could happen once we drop mmap_lock, and the pmd could plausibly undergo multiple transitions due to intervening fault, split, etc). Regardless, the code is prepared install a huge-pmd only when the existing pmd entry is either a genuine pte-table-mapping-pmd, or the none-pmd. However, the commit introduces a logical hole; namely, that we've allowed !none- && !huge- && !bad-pmds to be classified as genuine pte-table-mapping-pmds. One such example that could leak through are swap entries. The pmd values aren't checked again before use in pte_offset_map_lock(), which is expecting nothing less than a genuine pte-table-mapping-pmd. We want to put back the !pmd_present() check (below the pmd_none() check), but need to be careful to deal with subtleties in pmd transitions and treatments by various arch. The issue is that __split_huge_pmd_locked() temporarily clears the present bit (or otherwise marks the entry as invalid), but pmd_present() and pmd_trans_huge() still need to return true while the pmd is in this transitory state. For example, x86's pmd_present() also checks the _PAGE_PSE , riscv's version also checks the _PAGE_LEAF bit, and arm64 also checks a PMD_PRESENT_INVALID bit. Covering all 4 cases for x86 (all checks done on the same pmd value): 1) pmd_present() && pmd_trans_huge() All we actually know here is that the PSE bit is set. Either: a) We aren't racing with __split_huge_page(), and PRESENT or PROTNONE is set. => huge-pmd b) We are currently racing with __split_huge_page(). The danger here is that we proceed as-if we have a huge-pmd, but really we are looking at a pte-mapping-pmd. So, what is the risk of this danger? The only relevant path is: madvise_collapse() -> collapse_pte_mapped_thp() Where we might just incorrectly report back "success", when really the memory isn't pmd-backed. This is fine, since split could happen immediately after (actually) successful madvise_collapse(). So, it should be safe to just assume huge-pmd here. 2) pmd_present() && !pmd_trans_huge() Either: a) PSE not set and either PRESENT or PROTNONE is. => pte-table-mapping pmd (or PROT_NONE) b) devmap. This routine can be called immediately after unlocking/locking mmap_lock -- or called with no locks held (see khugepaged_scan_mm_slot()), so previous VMA checks have since been invalidated. 3) !pmd_present() && pmd_trans_huge() Not possible. 4) !pmd_present() && !pmd_trans_huge() Neither PRESENT nor PROTNONE set => not present I've checked all archs that implement pmd_trans_huge() (arm64, riscv, powerpc, longarch, x86, mips, s390) and this logic roughly translates (though devmap treatment is unique to x86 and powerpc, and (3) doesn't necessarily hold in general -- but that doesn't matter since !pmd_present() always takes failure path). Also, add a comment above find_pmd_or_thp_or_none() ---truncated---28d
CVE-2022-39123
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-20734
2.0%
1Improper initialization in some firmware for some Intel(R) Active Management Technology (Intel(R) AMT), and some Intel(R) Standard Manageability may allow an information disclosure. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.19d
CVE-2026-24915
2.0%
1
CVE-2024-8013
2.0%
1
CVE-2022-39898
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-34029
2.0%
1
CVE-2026-170113.8 BAJ
2.0%
1The Nexter Blocks WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 does not restrict who can save global CSS through one of its REST endpoints, allowing users with at least the Contributor role to store arbitrary CSS that is rendered site-wide on the front end, enabling defacement, content hiding, and UI redressing.6d