PULSE
FEED
ransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #117 · USransomsilentransomgroup reclama a S... G...ransomqilin reclama a Isapre Consalud · CL · Healthcareransomorova reclama a Harry's International · SG · Retail & E-Commerceransomeverstake reclama a da*****t.com · Technologyransomeverstake reclama a ra*****g.comransomredact reclama a Holland & Knight · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Astino Berhad · MY · Manufacturingransomakira reclama a Princeton Management · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Usnextransomakira reclama a Howells Motor Freight · US · Transportationransomsafepay reclama a deom.be · BEransomhyflock reclama a Ateşsan Ambalaj · TR · Manufacturingransompear reclama a Neiman & Company, Inc. · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #117 · US
CVE Watch406,792 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,792en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,588
  • Alto
    21,774
  • Medio
    20,296
  • Bajo
    2,113
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades392,641–392,680 · 406,792
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2025-58861—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2018-25276—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-23211—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-63270—
1.6%
——0URLs could be constructed which expanded environment variable or INI file values, so potentially sensitive information could be exfiltrated to a remote server on opening a document containing such links. The check added for CVE-2024-12426 did not cover every place a document can supply a URL. XForms instance data and the Calc csv and sql data providers still reached the expansion. In fixed versions these places refuse URLs with internal schemes when the URL comes from the document.27d
CVE-2026-651477.3 ALT
1.6%
——0NVIDIA DALI contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause an uncontrolled out-of-bounds read. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure and denial of service.18d
CVE-2025-435223.3 BAJ
1.6%
——0A downgrade issue affecting Intel-based Mac computers was addressed with additional code-signing restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.3, macOS Tahoe 26.2. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data.26d
CVE-2026-47888.4 ALT
1.6%
——0IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.37 stores sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user.101d
CVE-2025-601727.1 ALT
1.6%
——0Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in flytedesk Flytedesk Digital flytedesk-digital allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Flytedesk Digital: from n/a through <= 20181101.25d
CVE-2022-40519—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2024-1149—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-20159—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-23218—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-45098—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-24384—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-15576—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-25722—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-104113—
1.6%
——0A double free in the IP management daemon (ipmgmtd) of OmniOS and SmartOS allows a local user to crash the daemon. When authorizing a door request that modifies interface configuration, ipmgmt_handler() in usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/lib/ipmgmtd/ipmgmt_door.c frees the caller's credential with ucred_free() immediately after reading the user ID, and frees it a second time on the error path if the authorization check fails. An unprivileged local user who does not hold the solaris.network.interface.config authorization can send such a request, for example IPMGMT_CMD_RESETIF, to the ipmgmtd door, causing ipmgmtd to abort; repeated requests place the svc:/network/ip-interface-management service into maintenance, preventing IP interface configuration. The early free was introduced in 2014 to support lx-branded zones (OmniOS commit 4c170900) and is not present in upstream illumos-gate. It affects OmniOS r151020 and later, and SmartOS, prior to the fix.24d
CVE-2021-0409—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-50301—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-773967.1 ALT
1.6%
——0PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C. In 2.17 and earlier, the PJSIP AVI parser in pjmedia/src/pjmedia/avi_player.c uses an input-file video chunk length as the number of bytes copied into a frame buffer whose capacity is derived from the declared media dimensions. A crafted AVI file can therefore cause an attacker-controlled out-of-bounds write past the heap allocation when an application plays the file or pulls its frames. The existing size assertion does not protect production release builds, where assertions are disabled. Typical local playback can crash the process, while applications that accept untrusted AVI sources expose a stronger memory-corruption condition. No fixed version is available as of this review.17d
CVE-2025-62120—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-81322—
1.6%
——0Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in ash-project ash_cloak allows anyone with access to logs, error trackers, or crash reports, or anyone who can trigger a validation error, to recover the plaintext of a field the library encrypts. AshCloak.Transformers.SetUpEncryption removes each cloaked attribute from the action's accept list and adds an action argument that carries the plaintext into the encryption change. That argument is built with sensitive?: attr.sensitive?, inheriting the flag from the source attribute, so a cloaked attribute declared without sensitive? true produces a non-sensitive argument. It is the only place the cleartext value lives, and the one place Ash will not redact: it appears verbatim in inspect(changeset), Ash.Error.Invalid and validation error messages, telemetry, :sys dumps, and error-tracker payloads. The generated encrypted attribute and decrypt calculation are already hardcoded sensitive. This issue affects ash_cloak: from 0.1.0 before 0.4.0.62d
CVE-2026-1116644.4 MED
1.6%
——0Safing Portmaster before 2.2.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows unprivileged local processes to force updates by calling the POST /api/v1/updates/from-url endpoint registered with api.PermitAnyone. Attackers can supply an attacker-controlled index URL that bypasses version checks and auto-apply settings, installing older Safing-signed releases carrying previously fixed vulnerabilities.12d
CVE-2026-43410—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-40518—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2024-54101—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-20012—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-28559—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2021-0423—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2021-25459—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-28541—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-61971—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-21756—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-48409—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-1078483.5 BAJ
1.6%
——0Contao is an Open Source CMS. From version 4.0.0 until 5.3.50 and 5.7.12, RequestTokenListener validates REQUEST_TOKEN only for POST requests, while the declarative GET guard runs only when an act parameter is present. Backend actions dispatched through the key parameter can therefore execute without a CSRF token when an authenticated backend user loads an attacker-controlled URL. Reachable actions remain limited to modules available to that user, and the advisory demonstrates destructive or state-changing actions rather than privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in versions 5.3.50 and 5.7.12.17d
CVE-2023-33034—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-33035—
1.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-798087.8 ALT
1.6%
——0A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the OnGuard agent of ClearPass Policy Manager. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated local user to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges on the affected host or to disrupt the availability of the affected service.26d
CVE-2026-684207.1 ALT
1.6%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: reject optional IPTFS templates in outbound policies syzbot reported a stack-out-of-bounds read in xfrm_state_find() which flows from xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one(). Commit 3d776e31c841 ("xfrm: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies") disallowed optional tunnel and BEET in outbound policies to prevent this. Later when IPTFS added, it was not covered by that fix and can still trigger the out-of-bounds read; Extend the check to disallow optional IPTFS in outbound policies as well. IPTFS should be identical to tunnel mode. IN and FWD policies are not affected: xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one() is only reachable via the outbound path. Reproducer, before: ip link add dummy0 type dummy ip link set dummy0 up ip addr add 10.1.1.1/24 dev dummy0 ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.1/32 dst 10.1.1.2/32 dir out tmpl src fc00::dead:1 dst fc00::dead:2 proto esp reqid 1 mode iptfs level use tmpl src fc00::dead:1 dst fc00::dead:2 proto esp reqid 2 mode transport ping -W 1 -c 1 10.1.1.2 PING 10.1.1.2 (10.1.1.2) 56(84) bytes of data. [ 64.168420] ================================================================== [ 64.169977] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170 [ 64.169977] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800e1ffd20 by task ping/2844 [ 64.169977] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 2844 Comm: ping Not tainted 7.1.0-rc7-00180-geb23b588430a #98 PREEMPT(full) [ 64.169977] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 64.169977] Call Trace: [ 64.169977] <TASK> [ 64.169977] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70 [ 64.169977] ? __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170 [ 64.169977] print_report+0x152/0x4b0 [ 64.169977] ? ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x6d/0xa0 [ 64.169977] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 64.169977] ? rcu_read_unlock_sched+0xa/0x20 [ 64.169977] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x21b/0x230 [ 64.169977] ? __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170 [ 64.169977] kasan_report+0xa8/0xd0 [ 64.169977] ? __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170 [ 64.169977] __xfrm6_addr_hash+0x11e/0x170 [ 64.169977] __xfrm_dst_hash+0x24/0xc0 [ 64.169977] xfrm_state_find+0xa2d/0x2f90 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_state_find+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_ftrace_graph_ret_addr+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_ftrace_graph_ret_addr+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one+0x210/0x570 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? kernel_text_address+0x5b/0x80 [ 64.169977] ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 [ 64.169977] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x5e/0x90 [ 64.169977] ? arch_stack_walk+0x8c/0xe0 [ 64.169977] xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x130/0x200 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_policy_inexact_lookup_rcu+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __refcount_add_not_zero.constprop.0+0xb2/0x110 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx___refcount_add_not_zero.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0xd5/0x310 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x3d8/0xb80 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? ip_route_output_key_hash+0xc6/0x110 [ 64.169977] ? kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30 [ 64.169977] xfrm_lookup_route+0x18/0xe0 [ 64.169977] ip4_datagram_release_cb+0x4c9/0x530 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_ip4_datagram_release_cb+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x71/0xc0 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] release_sock+0xb0/0x170 [ 64.169977] udp_connect+0x43/0x50 [ 64.169977] __sys_connect+0xa6/0x100 [ 64.169977] ? alloc_fd+0x2e9/0x300 [ 64.169977] ? __pfx___sys_connect+0x10/0x10 [ 64.169977] ? preempt_latency ---truncated---78d
CVE-2025-428885.5 MED
1.6%
——0SAP GUI for Windows may allow a highly privileged user on the affected client PC to locally access sensitive information stored in process memory during runtime.This vulnerability has a high impact on confidentiality, with no impact on integrity and availability.15d