PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a fzmb GmbH, Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie · DE · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Global Holding · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a AmplifAI (GoDaddy instance) · US · Technologyransomdirewolf reclama a My Cloud Grocer · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransomhyflock reclama a hitech group · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shibata Co., Ltd. · JP · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Meshbesher & Spence · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a BKV Vasúti Jármjavító Kft · HU · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Forum · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomqilin reclama a fzmb GmbH, Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie · DE · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Global Holding · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a AmplifAI (GoDaddy instance) · US · Technologyransomdirewolf reclama a My Cloud Grocer · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransomhyflock reclama a hitech group · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Shibata Co., Ltd. · JP · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Meshbesher & Spence · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a BKV Vasúti Jármjavító Kft · HU · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Forum · AT · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Other
CVE Watch406,286 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,286en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,560
  • Alto
    21,573
  • Medio
    20,071
  • Bajo
    2,088
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades394,921–394,960 · 406,286
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-33987—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2024-38425—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2023-32848—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2023-43554—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-462277.8 ALT
1.0%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: revalidate list cursor after sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() in SCTP_SENDALL The SCTP_SENDALL path in sctp_sendmsg() iterates ep->asocs with list_for_each_entry_safe(), which caches the next entry in @tmp before the loop body runs. The body calls sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc(), which may drop the socket lock inside sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(). While the lock is dropped, another thread can SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF the association cached in @tmp, migrating it to a new endpoint via sctp_sock_migrate() (list_del_init() + list_add_tail() to newep->asocs), and optionally close the new socket which frees the association via kfree_rcu(). The cached @tmp can also be freed by a network ABORT for that association, processed in softirq while the lock is dropped. sctp_wait_for_sndbuf() revalidates @asoc (the current entry) on re-lock via the "sk != asoc->base.sk" and "asoc->base.dead" checks, but nothing revalidates @tmp. After a successful return, the iterator advances to the stale @tmp, yielding either a use-after-free (if the peeled socket was closed) or a list-walk onto the new endpoint's list head (type confusion of &newep->asocs as a struct sctp_association *). Both are reachable from CapEff=0; the type-confusion path gives controlled indirect call via the outqueue.sched->init_sid pointer. Fix by re-deriving @tmp from @asoc after sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() returns. @asoc is known to still be on ep->asocs at that point: the only callers that list_del an association from ep->asocs are sctp_association_free() (which sets asoc->base.dead) and sctp_assoc_migrate() (which changes asoc->base.sk), and sctp_wait_for_sndbuf() checks both under the lock before any successful return; a tripped check propagates as err < 0 and the loop bails before the re-derive. The SCTP_ABORT path in sctp_sendmsg_check_sflags() returns 0 and the loop hits 'continue' before sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc() is ever called, so the @tmp cached by list_for_each_entry_safe() still covers the lock-held free that ba59fb027307 ("sctp: walk the list of asoc safely") was added for.13d
CVE-2025-67860—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-917884.7 MED
1.0%
——0When implementing the JavaScript interface, Foxit PDF Editor/Reader did not perform the attribute authorization checks required by the specification. As a result, a trusted malicious PDF could potentially access sensitive content from other documents within the same process and transmit it externally.3d
CVE-2026-885145.5 MED
1.0%
——0An issue in iTerm2 macOS before 3.6.12 allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information.25d
CVE-2026-202466.0 MED
1.0%
——0A vulnerability in the vmadmin CLI of Cisco Umbrella Virtual Appliance could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied commands. An attacker with vmadmin privileges could exploit this vulnerability by using certain commands at the CLI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root.6d
CVE-2024-33056—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-396345.4 MED
1.0%
——0Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Portfolio grandportfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Portfolio: from n/a through <= 3.3.100d
CVE-2026-475656.4 MED
1.0%
——0NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where a privileged user could trigger a race condition that leads to an out-of-bounds write. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.32d
CVE-2025-48646—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2024-33021—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2024-20023—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2025-583056.2 MED
1.0%
——0Identity authentication bypass vulnerability in the Gallery app. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.25d
CVE-2026-495006.0 MED
1.0%
——0Dell Alienware Command Center (AWCC), versions prior to 6.14.20.0, contain an Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of Service and Elevation of Privileges.10d
CVE-2024-33022—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-1142363.3 BAJ
1.0%
——0storage/pkg/archive.ApplyLayer and ApplyUncompressedLayer may, when processing corrupt or malicious inputs, leak a file descriptor; unbounded repeated calls can exhaust the process’ file descriptor limit3d
CVE-2026-767373.0 BAJ
1.0%
——0An authenticated path traversal vulnerability exists in the command line interface of HPE Networking Instant On. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker with administrative access to modify a limited set of files on the underlying operating system and to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service.33d
CVE-2026-20410—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2022-25820—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-210235.5 MED
1.0%
——0Insufficient verification of data authenticity in PackageManagerService prior to SMR Mar-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to modify the installation restriction of specific application.7d
CVE-2024-30142—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2021-25409—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-446367.4 ALT
1.0%
——0libsixel is a SIXEL encoder/decoder implementation derived from kmiya's sixel. From to 1.8.7-r1, signed integer overflow in sixel_encode_highcolor's allocation size calculation can lead to a heap buffer overflow. The public sixel_encode entry point validates only that width and height are greater than zero, with no upper bound. width and height are multiplied as plain int when computing the allocation size for paletted_pixels and normalized_pixels. Any caller that asks libsixel to encode a pixel buffer with width times height greater than INT_MAX (about 2.15 billion) will hit a wrapped allocation size; under the right wrap, the malloc succeeds with a buffer much smaller than the encoder expects, and the encoder writes past the end of the heap allocation. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.7-r2.6d
CVE-2021-39783—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-1076127.8 ALT
1.0%
——0Incorrect permission assignment in GlavSoft TightVNC Server for Windows before 2.8.88 allows a local authenticated user to read or overwrite the inter-process communication handles used between the TightVNC service and its desktop server process. The named shared memory segment in the Global\ namespace that carries the pipe HANDLE values is created with a NULL DACL, and its name is derived from a time-seeded srand(time(0)) value that is predictable to one-second granularity. A low-privileged local process can open the mapping and tamper with the IPC channel of a service running as SYSTEM, potentially leading to disclosure of session data, privilege escalation, or denial of service.24d
CVE-2023-43556—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2023-23346—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-473206.1 MED
1.0%
——0Access of uninitialized pointer, Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Pointer Manipulation, Oversized Serialized Data Payloads. This issue affects rlottie: before eae37633fda13ac05b25c6c95aacea4bc33c80a3.102d
CVE-2026-537394.3 MED
1.0%
——0Yoast Duplicate Post through 4.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post_dismiss_notice handler, which verifies no nonce or capability. Attackers can trick any authenticated user into sending a request that sets the duplicate_post_show_notice site option, suppressing admin notices network-wide.102d
CVE-2026-569366.8 MED
1.0%
——0In wacom_hid_set_device_mode of wacom_sys.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.26d
CVE-2026-495106.1 MED
1.0%
——0Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Integer Attacks. This issue affects rlottie: before 21292665023e5074b38254432716866d00f1985f.102d
CVE-2025-54643—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2026-470904.6 MED
1.0%
——0Claude HUD through 0.0.12, patched in commit 234d9aa, constructs OSC 8 terminal hyperlink escape sequences using raw cwd and branchUrl values without stripping control characters or encoding embedded values, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary ANSI codes into terminal sessions. Attackers can embed ESC+backslash sequences in the current working directory or branch URL to execute malicious ANSI codes including text color changes, forged prompts, and OSC 52 clipboard writes, or trigger outbound HTTP requests to attacker-controlled remotes when hyperlinks are clicked.6d
CVE-2026-269466.7 MED
1.0%
——0Dell ECS versions 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.3.0.0, contains an improper privilege management vulnerability in the OS. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges.6d
CVE-2026-537656.1 MED
1.0%
——0Chrome DevTools for agents (chrome-devtools-mcp) lets your coding agent control and inspect a live Chrome browser. From 0.20.0 until 1.1.0, The chrome-devtools-mcp daemon writes its PID file with fs.writeFileSync() to a deterministic runtime path. On typical macOS environments, and on Linux sessions where $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is unset, that runtime path falls back to /tmp/chrome-devtools-mcp-<uid>/daemon.pid. Because the write does not use O_NOFOLLOW, a local low-privilege user on the same POSIX host can pre-create /tmp/chrome-devtools-mcp-<victim_uid>/daemon.pid as a symlink to a file writable by the victim. When the victim later starts daemon mode, fs.writeFileSync() follows the symlink and truncates the target file to the daemon PID string. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.0.7d
CVE-2023-21296—
1.0%
——0——
CVE-2024-21461—
1.0%
——0——