PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomvexy ransomware reclama a System Soft · BG · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a JHAMF Group · BDransomemperador reclama a Punta Shopping · BR · Retail & E-Commerceransomnightspire reclama a **F*A *.Aransompayload reclama a Straze Garden Center · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Kraft Lernen · DE · Educationransompayload reclama a SALEG (Sachsen-Anhaltische Landesentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH) · DE · Government & Defenseransomrhysida reclama a Phoenix Charter Academy · US · Educationransomauditteam reclama a Pe***CT · NLransomqilin reclama a Select Community Management · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a CMD Naturkosmetik · DE · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a qc-consult · DE · Professional Servicesransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomvexy ransomware reclama a System Soft · BG · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a JHAMF Group · BDransomemperador reclama a Punta Shopping · BR · Retail & E-Commerceransomnightspire reclama a **F*A *.Aransompayload reclama a Straze Garden Center · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Kraft Lernen · DE · Educationransompayload reclama a SALEG (Sachsen-Anhaltische Landesentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH) · DE · Government & Defenseransomrhysida reclama a Phoenix Charter Academy · US · Educationransomauditteam reclama a Pe***CT · NL
CVE Watch406,265 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,265en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,569
  • Alto
    21,650
  • Medio
    20,162
  • Bajo
    2,095
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades395,441–395,480 · 406,265
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-916294.7 MED
0.9%
——0Vulnerability in the Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management product of Oracle Communications (component: Platform). Supported versions that are affected are 15.0.0.0.0, 15.0.1.0.0, 15.1.0.0.0 and 15.2.0.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management executes to compromise Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).6d
CVE-2026-981375.5 MED
0.9%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: treat any nonzero dio zero-range return as an error ntfs_dio_zero_range() returns either 0 or a negative errno from blkdev_issue_zeroout(); it never returns a positive value. The zeroing failure check in ntfs_attr_fallocate() therefore never fired, so a failed zeroing operation was silently ignored: the loop kept going, the newly allocated clusters were folded into initialized_size and the write could succeed leaving stale on-disk data. Treat any nonzero return as an error and abort the allocation.13d
CVE-2026-24922—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2024-43082—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-431167.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: ensure safe access to master conntrack Holding reference on the expectation is not sufficient, the master conntrack object can just go away, making exp->master invalid. To access exp->master safely: - Grab the nf_conntrack_expect_lock, this gets serialized with clean_from_lists() which also holds this lock when the master conntrack goes away. - Hold reference on master conntrack via nf_conntrack_find_get(). Not so easy since the master tuple to look up for the master conntrack is not available in the existing problematic paths. This patch goes for extending the nf_conntrack_expect_lock section to address this issue for simplicity, in the cases that are described below this is just slightly extending the lock section. The add expectation command already holds a reference to the master conntrack from ctnetlink_create_expect(). However, the delete expectation command needs to grab the spinlock before looking up for the expectation. Expand the existing spinlock section to address this to cover the expectation lookup. Note that, the nf_ct_expect_iterate_net() calls already grabs the spinlock while iterating over the expectation table, which is correct. The get expectation command needs to grab the spinlock to ensure master conntrack does not go away. This also expands the existing spinlock section to cover the expectation lookup too. I needed to move the netlink skb allocation out of the spinlock to keep it GFP_KERNEL. For the expectation events, the IPEXP_DESTROY event is already delivered under the spinlock, just move the delivery of IPEXP_NEW under the spinlock too because the master conntrack event cache is reached through exp->master. While at it, add lockdep notations to help identify what codepaths need to grab the spinlock.13d
CVE-2026-286647.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In WriteImageToDisk of runtime_image.cc, there is a possible file tampering due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.39d
CVE-2023-42718—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-4250—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2022-20279—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-498817.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In serviceClassExists of InCallController.java, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.39d
CVE-2026-54202.5 BAJ
0.9%
——0A security flaw has been discovered in Shinrays Games Goods Triple App up to 1.200. The affected element is an unknown function of the file jRwTX.java of the component cats.goods.sort.sorting.games. Performing a manipulation of the argument AES_IV/AES_PASSWORD results in use of hard-coded cryptographic key . Attacking locally is a requirement. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.100d
CVE-2024-31333—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2023-24844—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-868197.1 ALT
0.9%
——0Waves Central for macOS contains a local privilege escalation in the privileged helper service. The helper authorizes connecting XPC clients by comparing the caller's code-signing certificate chain for equality with its own, rather than validating the caller against a pinned code requirement (application identifier and Team ID). A local, authenticated user can execute code within the vendor-signed process, satisfy the helper's client check, and cause the helper to execute a script with root privileges. Fixed in 17.0.48d
CVE-2017-18153—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-4217—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2025-22404—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2024-20030—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2024-38417—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2024-38416—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-587667.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.44d
CVE-2024-38411—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2022-20287—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-4251—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2022-20293—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-462585.5 MED
0.9%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpio: cdev: Avoid NULL dereference in linehandle_create() In linehandle_create(), there is a statement like this: retain_and_null_ptr(lh); Soon after, there is a debug printout that dereferences "lh", which will crash things. Avoid the crash by using handlereq.lines, which is the same value.102d
CVE-2026-533045.5 MED
0.9%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: sg: Resolve soft lockup issue when opening /dev/sgX The parameter def_reserved_size defines the default buffer size reserved for each Sg_fd and should be restricted to a range between 0 and 1,048,576 (see https://tldp.org/HOWTO/SCSI-Generic-HOWTO/proc.html). Although the function sg_proc_write_dressz enforces this limit, it is possible to bypass it by directly modifying the module parameter as shown below, which then causes a soft lockup: echo -1 > /sys/module/sg/parameters/def_reserved_size exec 4<> /dev/sg0 watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 26 seconds! [bash:537] Modules loaded: CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 537 Command: bash, kernel version 6.19.0-rc3+ #134, PREEMPT disabled Hardware: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS version 1.16.1-2.fc37 dated 04/01/2014 ... Call Trace: sg_build_reserve+0x5c/0xa0 sg_add_sfp+0x168/0x270 sg_open+0x16e/0x340 chrdev_open+0xbe/0x230 do_dentry_open+0x175/0x480 vfs_open+0x34/0xf0 do_open+0x265/0x3d0 path_openat+0x110/0x290 do_filp_open+0xc3/0x170 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0xe0 __x64_sys_openat+0x6d/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x62/0x310 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The fix is to use module_param_cb to validate and reject invalid values assigned to def_reserved_size.118d
CVE-2024-20070—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-20411—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-20409—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-621394.3 MED
0.9%
——0Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Site Kit by Google <= 1.186.0 versions.51d
CVE-2026-552857.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In openLogicalChannel of multiple files, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.37d
CVE-2023-21183—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-285947.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In multiple locations, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.47d
CVE-2026-286397.8 ALT
0.9%
——0In rw_mfc_handle_read_op of rw_mfc.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.47d
CVE-2022-20276—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2023-20612—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2022-32638—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2023-21147—
0.9%
——0——
CVE-2026-585574.8 MED
0.9%
——0Design defect vulnerability in Expedition mode. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability.8d