PULSE
FEED
ransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomvexy ransomware reclama a System Soft · BG · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a JHAMF Group · BDransomemperador reclama a Punta Shopping · BR · Retail & E-Commerceransomnightspire reclama a **F*A *.Aransompayload reclama a Straze Garden Center · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Kraft Lernen · DE · Educationransompayload reclama a SALEG (Sachsen-Anhaltische Landesentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH) · DE · Government & Defenseransomrhysida reclama a Phoenix Charter Academy · US · Educationransomauditteam reclama a Pe***CT · NLransomauditteam reclama a jl***om · SGransomauditteam reclama a hn***rgransomauditteam reclama a ro***upransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomvexy ransomware reclama a System Soft · BG · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a JHAMF Group · BDransomemperador reclama a Punta Shopping · BR · Retail & E-Commerceransomnightspire reclama a **F*A *.Aransompayload reclama a Straze Garden Center · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Kraft Lernen · DE · Educationransompayload reclama a SALEG (Sachsen-Anhaltische Landesentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH) · DE · Government & Defenseransomrhysida reclama a Phoenix Charter Academy · US · Educationransomauditteam reclama a Pe***CT · NLransomauditteam reclama a jl***om · SGransomauditteam reclama a hn***rgransomauditteam reclama a ro***up
CVE Watch406,265 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,265en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,582
  • Alto
    21,698
  • Medio
    20,219
  • Bajo
    2,102
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades395,721–395,760 · 406,265
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2023-20632—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-169277.3 ALT
0.8%
——0IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to gain root privileges due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition.6d
CVE-2022-33693—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-844147.8 ALT
0.8%
——0IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to change the ownership of arbitrary files due to improper validation of an attacker-controlled file path.30d
CVE-2022-33694—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-53171—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-3395—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2024-224516.7 MED
0.8%
——0Dell Peripheral Manager, versions from 1.5.1 to 1.7.2, contain an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability through preloading malicious executable, leading to arbitrary code execution.31d
CVE-2026-461655.5 MED
0.8%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: openvswitch: vport: fix self-deadlock on release of tunnel ports vports are used concurrently and protected by RCU, so netdev_put() must happen after the RCU grace period. So, either in an RCU call or after the synchronize_net(). The rtnl_delete_link() must happen under RTNL and so can't be executed in RCU context. Calling synchronize_net() while holding RTNL is not a good idea for performance and system stability under load in general, so calling netdev_put() in RCU call is the right solution here. However, when the device is deleted, rtnl_unlock() will call netdev_run_todo() and block until all the references are gone. In the current code this means that we never reach the call_rcu() and the vport is never freed and the reference is never released, causing a self-deadlock on device removal. Fix that by moving the rcu_call() before the rtnl_unlock(), so the scheduled RCU callback will be executed when synchronize_net() is called from the rtnl_unlock()->netdev_run_todo() while the RTNL itself is already released.2d
CVE-2024-47935—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-399845.5 MED
0.8%
——0Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Versions 2.0.5 and below contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the VerifyTimestampResponse function. VerifyTimestampResponse correctly verifies the certificate chain signature, but the TSA-specific constraint checks in VerifyLeafCert uses the first non-CA certificate from the PKCS#7 certificate bag instead of the leaf certificate from the verified chain. An attacker can exploit this by prepending a forged certificate to the certificate bag while the message is signed with an authorized key, causing the library to validate the signature against one certificate but perform authorization checks against another. This vulnerability only affects users of the timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification package and does not affect the timestamp-authority service itself or sigstore-go. The issue has been fixed in version 2.0.6.6d
CVE-2026-640317.8 ALT
0.8%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: erofs: fix managed cache race for unaligned extents After unaligned compressed extents were introduced, the following race could occur: [Thread 1] [Thread 2] (z_erofs_fill_bio_vec) <handle a Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_FOLIO folio> ... filemap_add_folio (1) (z_erofs_bind_cache) <the same folio is found..> .. .. folio_attach_private (2) filemap_add_folio (3) again Since (1) is executed but (2) hasn't been executed yet, it's possible that another thread finds the same managed folio in z_erofs_bind_cache() for a different pcluster and calls filemap_add_folio() again since folio->private is still Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_FOLIO. Fix this by explicitly clearing folio->private before making the folio visible in the managed cache so that another pcluster can simply wait on the locked managed folio as what we did for other shared cases [1]. This only impacts unaligned data compression (`-E48bit` with zstd, for example). [1] Commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly") was originally introduced to handle crafted overlapped extents, but it addresses unaligned extents as well.19d
CVE-2023-20740—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-48408—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-48399—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-113086.3 MED
0.8%
——0Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to perform privilege escalation via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low)101d
CVE-2025-48519—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-13917—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-42723—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2021-25457—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-52540—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-21214—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2022-23427—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-53174—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2023-42721—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2024-20095—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-281993.3 BAJ
0.8%
——0An authenticated user with access to the NetBackup Flex OS management shell could read arbitrary files from the underlying operating system by supplying a specially crafted path argument to a diagnostic command. Successful exploitation could expose sensitive system configuration and credential material stored on the appliance.44d
CVE-2025-13532—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2022-20342—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2024-39819—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2025-0044—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-23167—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-314867.1 ALT
0.8%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hwmon: (pmbus/core) Protect regulator operations with mutex The regulator operations pmbus_regulator_get_voltage(), pmbus_regulator_set_voltage(), and pmbus_regulator_list_voltage() access PMBus registers and shared data but were not protected by the update_lock mutex. This could lead to race conditions. However, adding mutex protection directly to these functions causes a deadlock because pmbus_regulator_notify() (which calls regulator_notifier_call_chain()) is often called with the mutex already held (e.g., from pmbus_fault_handler()). If a regulator callback then calls one of the now-protected voltage functions, it will attempt to acquire the same mutex. Rework pmbus_regulator_notify() to utilize a worker function to send notifications outside of the mutex protection. Events are stored as atomics in a per-page bitmask and processed by the worker. Initialize the worker and its associated data during regulator registration, and ensure it is cancelled on device removal using devm_add_action_or_reset(). While at it, remove the unnecessary include of linux/of.h.2d
CVE-2025-48531—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2022-33699—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-854227.8 ALT
0.8%
——0A vulnerability in Brocade ASCG version before 3.5.0 could allow an attacker to obtain a static cryptographic key hardcoded into the software binaries to secure sensitive data at rest and to protect inter-node communication protocols. An attacker who extracts this key can decrypt stored management credentials or craft forged administrative synchronization messages.18d
CVE-2022-33692—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-845624.7 MED
0.8%
——0A race condition was addressed with additional validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26.6. An app may be able to access protected user data.45d
CVE-2022-20307—
0.8%
——0——
CVE-2026-21138—
0.8%
——0Insufficient verification of data authenticity in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.73 allows physical attackers to install arbitrary applications.17d