PULSE
FEED
ransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomvexy ransomware reclama a System Soft · BG · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a JHAMF Group · BDransomemperador reclama a Punta Shopping · BR · Retail & E-Commerceransomnightspire reclama a **F*A *.Aransompayload reclama a Straze Garden Center · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Kraft Lernen · DE · Educationransompayload reclama a SALEG (Sachsen-Anhaltische Landesentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH) · DE · Government & Defenseransomrhysida reclama a Phoenix Charter Academy · US · Educationransomauditteam reclama a Pe***CT · NLransomauditteam reclama a jl***om · SGransomauditteam reclama a hn***rgransomauditteam reclama a ro***upransombarracuda reclama a EVINOKS · TR · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Danser · US · Otherransomvexy ransomware reclama a System Soft · BG · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a JHAMF Group · BDransomemperador reclama a Punta Shopping · BR · Retail & E-Commerceransomnightspire reclama a **F*A *.Aransompayload reclama a Straze Garden Center · Retail & E-Commerceransompayload reclama a Kraft Lernen · DE · Educationransompayload reclama a SALEG (Sachsen-Anhaltische Landesentwicklungsgesellschaft mbH) · DE · Government & Defenseransomrhysida reclama a Phoenix Charter Academy · US · Educationransomauditteam reclama a Pe***CT · NLransomauditteam reclama a jl***om · SGransomauditteam reclama a hn***rgransomauditteam reclama a ro***up
CVE Watch406,233 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

406,233en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,766
Nuevos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,698

Distribución · última ventana

  • Crítico
    5,579
  • Alto
    21,699
  • Medio
    20,217
  • Bajo
    2,100
Filtros
Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades396,121–396,160 · 406,233
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-46063—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-36847—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-33689—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2024-23357—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-486408.0 ALT
0.6%
——0In multiple locations, there is a possible 3rd party passkey entry pairing approval due to a missing permission check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.25d
CVE-2023-20803—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-319726.5 MED
0.6%
——0HCL BigFix SM is affected by a Sensitive Information Exposure vulnerability where internal connections do not use TLS encryption which could allow an attacker unauthorized access to sensitive data transmitted between internal components.36d
CVE-2026-185674.4 MED
0.6%
——0IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain information due to a race condition involving a predictable Unix domain socket path in a world-writable directory.53d
CVE-2026-53856—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-21377—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2021-0884—
0.5%
——0——
CVE-2025-21432—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-21289—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-40385—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-40135—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-22830—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-26425—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2022-20315—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-52486—
0.6%
——0An issue in OpenDDS 3.33.x allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the verify function in the SIgnedDocument module53d
CVE-2026-23294—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-40139—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2024-21478—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-47319—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2023-21170—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-473373.3 BAJ
0.6%
——0Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches with a possible NULL pointer dereference in the handling of AF_INET/AF_INET6 socket mediation. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. This can lead to a kernel oops.18d
CVE-2025-485967.8 ALT
0.6%
——0In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.25d
CVE-2026-622046.6 MED
0.6%
——0SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 fail to validate that packageName matches the downloaded package content in bazaar install endpoints. Attackers with same-origin access can overwrite existing trusted plugins by supplying mismatched packageName and repoURL parameters, achieving persistence across application restarts.20d
CVE-2023-21044—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-48545—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2025-27067—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-316567.8 ALT
0.6%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/i915/gt: fix refcount underflow in intel_engine_park_heartbeat A use-after-free / refcount underflow is possible when the heartbeat worker and intel_engine_park_heartbeat() race to release the same engine->heartbeat.systole request. The heartbeat worker reads engine->heartbeat.systole and calls i915_request_put() on it when the request is complete, but clears the pointer in a separate, non-atomic step. Concurrently, a request retirement on another CPU can drop the engine wakeref to zero, triggering __engine_park() -> intel_engine_park_heartbeat(). If the heartbeat timer is pending at that point, cancel_delayed_work() returns true and intel_engine_park_heartbeat() reads the stale non-NULL systole pointer and calls i915_request_put() on it again, causing a refcount underflow: ``` <4> [487.221889] Workqueue: i915-unordered engine_retire [i915] <4> [487.222640] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x68/0xb0 ... <4> [487.222707] Call Trace: <4> [487.222711] <TASK> <4> [487.222716] intel_engine_park_heartbeat.part.0+0x6f/0x80 [i915] <4> [487.223115] intel_engine_park_heartbeat+0x25/0x40 [i915] <4> [487.223566] __engine_park+0xb9/0x650 [i915] <4> [487.223973] ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x2e/0xb0 [i915] <4> [487.224408] __intel_wakeref_put_last+0x72/0x90 [i915] <4> [487.224797] intel_context_exit_engine+0x7c/0x80 [i915] <4> [487.225238] intel_context_exit+0xf1/0x1b0 [i915] <4> [487.225695] i915_request_retire.part.0+0x1b9/0x530 [i915] <4> [487.226178] i915_request_retire+0x1c/0x40 [i915] <4> [487.226625] engine_retire+0x122/0x180 [i915] <4> [487.227037] process_one_work+0x239/0x760 <4> [487.227060] worker_thread+0x200/0x3f0 <4> [487.227068] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 <4> [487.227075] kthread+0x10d/0x150 <4> [487.227083] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 <4> [487.227092] ret_from_fork+0x3d4/0x480 <4> [487.227099] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 <4> [487.227107] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 <4> [487.227141] </TASK> ``` Fix this by replacing the non-atomic pointer read + separate clear with xchg() in both racing paths. xchg() is a single indivisible hardware instruction that atomically reads the old pointer and writes NULL. This guarantees only one of the two concurrent callers obtains the non-NULL pointer and performs the put, the other gets NULL and skips it. (cherry picked from commit 13238dc0ee4f9ab8dafa2cca7295736191ae2f42)13d
CVE-2021-0885—
0.6%
——0——
CVE-2026-644155.5 MED
0.6%
——0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/swap: add cond_resched() in swap_reclaim_full_clusters to prevent softlockup We hit a real softlockup in an internal stress test environment. The workload was LTP memory/swap stress on a large arm64 machine, with 320 CPUs, about 1TB memory and an 8.6GB swap device. The system was under heavy load and the swap device had a large number of full clusters. The softlockup was triggered during a stress test after about 3 days. So, add periodic cond_resched() calls during large full_clusters reclaim operations to prevent softlockup issues. Detailed call trace as follow: PID: 3817773 TASK: ffff0883bb28b780 CPU: 48 COMMAND: "kworker/48:7" #0 [ffff800080183d10] __crash_kexec at ffffa4c1361e5de4 #1 [ffff800080183d90] panic at ffffa4c1360d5e9c #2 [ffff800080183e20] watchdog_timer_fn at ffffa4c136231fa8 ... #16 [ffff8000c4ad3cb0] swap_cache_del_folio at ffffa4c1363e1614 #17 [ffff8000c4ad3ce0] __try_to_reclaim_swap at ffffa4c1363e4bfc #18 [ffff8000c4ad3d40] swap_reclaim_full_clusters at ffffa4c1363e5474 #19 [ffff8000c4ad3da0] swap_reclaim_work at ffffa4c1363e550c #20 [ffff8000c4ad3dc0] process_one_work at ffffa4c136102edc #21 [ffff8000c4ad3e10] worker_thread at ffffa4c136103398 #22 [ffff8000c4ad3e70] kthread at ffffa4c13610d95c58d
CVE-2026-210285.5 MED
0.5%
——0Improper access control in AuditLogService prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.6d
CVE-2021-0875—
0.5%
——0——
CVE-2026-767363.3 BAJ
0.5%
——0A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Instant On. Successful exploitation could allow a low-privilege authenticated local attacker to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service.32d
CVE-2026-735933.0 BAJ
0.5%
——0Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Active Debug Code vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access.17d
CVE-2023-20716—
0.5%
——0——
CVE-2023-20984—
0.5%
——0——
CVE-2023-20675—
0.5%
——0——