PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
← Todos os CVEs
CVE Watch8 de out. de 2026

CVE-2018-7160

The Node.js inspector, in 6.x and later is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack which could be exploited to perform remote code execution. A

CVSS

8.8

Alta

EPSS

9.5%

p96

KEV

—

Exploit Today

29

0-100

Publicado: 17 de mai. de 2018 · Última mod.: 8 de out. de 2026 · CWE-350 · CWE-290

EPSS · 30d
9.5%EPSS · 30 dias9.9%
2026-10-142026-11-11
Descrição técnica

The Node.js inspector, in 6.x and later is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack which could be exploited to perform remote code execution. An attack is possible from malicious websites open in a web browser on the same computer, or another computer with network access to the computer running the Node.js process. A malicious website could use a DNS rebinding attack to trick the web browser to bypass same-origin-policy checks and to allow HTTP connections to localhost or to hosts on the local network. If a Node.js process with the debug port active is running on localhost or on a host on the local network, the malicious website could connect to it as a debugger, and get full code execution access.

Referências oficiais
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-1190395.3 MÉD
—
——0The Defender Security WordPress plugin before 6.4.1 does not verify that the client IP address it derives for its firewall and lockout decisions actually originates from a trusted source, trusting a user-supplied value by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to spoof their IP address and evade IP-based protections such as login lockout and IP banning, impersonate an allowlisted address, and poison the Defender Security WordPress plugin before 6.4.1's activity logs.8h
CVE-2026-1262147.2 ALT
—
——0A authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated administrator to escalate their privileges, bypass authorization controls or impersonate internal services via specially crafted requests to the GUI.4h
CVE-2026-1261848.2 ALT
—
——0A authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an attacker to disrupt the HA state.22h
CVE-2026-1265429.8 CRÍ
55.5%
——17WWBN AVideo 6.5 through 29.7.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to log in as any user via Hybridauth social login display names. Attackers can set their X, Facebook, Yahoo or LinkedIn display name to a victim's username and withhold email, causing login.json.php or oauth2.php to log them in as that account, including administrators, without a password.2d
CVE-2026-40668—
9.7%
——3Authentication bypass by spoofing in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to request attestation reports for VMPL 0.3h
CVE-2026-1199595.3 MÉD
23.5%
——7Improper access control in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing locally.2d