PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #137 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #136 · DKransomn0n reclama a Company #135 · IDransomn0n reclama a Company #134 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #133 · USransomredact reclama a Omni Hotels & Resorts · US · Hospitalityransomakira reclama a Westboro Partnersransomakira reclama a System Plus · Technologyransomakira reclama a David L Wade & Associates · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Source Energy Services · CA · Energy & Utilitiesransomaoqin reclama a Sistel · BR · Technologyransombyod reclama a First and Final Warning - IHG Hotels & Resorts (Estate) · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a Calvary Christian College · AU · Educationransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #137 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #136 · DKransomn0n reclama a Company #135 · IDransomn0n reclama a Company #134 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #133 · USransomredact reclama a Omni Hotels & Resorts · US · Hospitalityransomakira reclama a Westboro Partnersransomakira reclama a System Plus · Technologyransomakira reclama a David L Wade & Associates · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Source Energy Services · CA · Energy & Utilitiesransomaoqin reclama a Sistel · BR · Technologyransombyod reclama a First and Final Warning - IHG Hotels & Resorts (Estate) · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a Calvary Christian College · AU · Education
← Todos os CVEs
CVE Watch25 de ago. de 2026

CVE-2021-45105

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referent

CVSS

5.9

Média

EPSS

100.0%

p100

KEV

—

Exploit Today

30

0-100

Publicado: 18 de dez. de 2021 · Última mod.: 25 de ago. de 2026 · CWE-20 · CWE-674

EPSS · 30d
100.0%EPSS · 30 dias100.0%
2026-10-082026-11-05
Descrição técnica

Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.

Referências oficiais
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-76181—
—
——0LibreOffice includes a dBASE database driver, which reads dBASE tables and their .ndx index files when a folder of dBASE files is used as a data source. A heap buffer overflow existed when an index page was read. The number of entries recorded in a page was not checked against the number of entries the page could hold, which comes from a different field of the index header. A crafted index could also make a page refer back to itself, so that reading it recursed without end. In fixed versions the index header and the entry count of each page are limited to what an index page can hold, and a page that refers back to one of its parent pages is not followed.6h
CVE-2026-715488.8 ALT
—
——0SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, AOR_Report::build_report_query_where incorporates a report editor's parameter_value when value_type=Field without sufficient validation. An authenticated user who can save a report can use SQL injection to read the entire SuiteCRM database. Disclosed data can include users.user_hash, OAuth2 tokens, CRM records, report definitions, and configuration data; the connector does not permit stacked queries, so direct write-through-injection is not supported. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2.7h
CVE-2026-1164722.7 BAI
—
——0A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where a user with permission to create an Ingress may be able to cause denial of service of the ingress-nginx data plane, or possibly redirect traffic from other Ingresses. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they are using ingress-nginx. Due to a missing check, the mirror-target Ingress annotation can be used to target an unauthenticated configuration API within the ingress-nginx controller, allowing write commands to be submitted. Corrupting the data within that configuration API results in all traffic through ingress-nginx being dropped until an Ingress configuration change or a controller restart causes the data to be recreated correctly. In principle, this write access could also be used to redirect traffic from other Ingresses controlled by the same ingress-nginx instance. In practice, there is negligible additional risk: such redirection would require privileged information about internal ingress-nginx state, and users can already redirect traffic from other Ingresses controlled by the same ingress-nginx anyway.7h
CVE-2026-971746.8 MÉD
—
——0A flaw was found in the Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) implementation of Keycloak. The CIBA endpoint fails to properly validate the sub parameter, allowing it to be stored as an additional request parameter. During the token issuance process, this injected value overwrites the legitimate subject identifier. This allows an attacker to authenticate as themselves but receive security tokens belonging to a different victim user, leading to unauthorized account access.8h
CVE-2026-928578.1 ALT
—
——0Keycloak provides a Dynamic Client Registration feature that allows users with specific tokens to register their own applications. A flaw in how Keycloak validates these registration requests allows an attacker to create a malicious application that forges identity information. By mapping their own user profile details to protected fields like the user ID (sub) or intended audience (aud), an attacker can generate signed security tokens that make them appear to be a different user. This could allow an attacker to impersonate other users or gain unauthorized access to services that rely on these tokens for identity verification.8h
CVE-2026-1231848.1 ALT
—
——0An incorrect authorization vulnerability exists in the Altium 365 Git Service. The permission check performed when a user pushes to a project repository did not correctly evaluate the required access level, so the check passed for any user holding any level of access to the project. As a result, an authenticated user with view-only access to a project could write to that project's git repository. Read access was evaluated correctly and was not affected, and exploitation requires an authenticated account with existing access to the target project. The issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level and no customer action is required. On-premise Altium Enterprise Server is not affected.6h