CVE-2026-100122
CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An a
CVSS
7.5
Alta
EPSS
0.3%
p22
KEV
—
Exploit Today
7
0-100
Publicado: 13 de out. de 2026 · Última mod.: 15 de out. de 2026 · CWE-295
0.3%EPSS · 30 dias0.3%
2026-10-142026-11-06
CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-48057——
———Botan is a C++ cryptography library. Prior to 3.13.0, Botan's X.509 Distinguished Name decoder flattens the Attribute-Value Assertions in each Relative Distinguished Name and loses multi-value RDN grouping before DN name-constraint enforcement. An attacker controlling a name-constrained intermediate CA can issue a certificate with a multi-value RDN whose first Common Name matches the permitted constraint and whose second Common Name is attacker-chosen, causing the constraint check to accept the flattened first value. If the certificate contains no subjectAlternativeName extension, the second Common Name can then be accepted as a hostname; Botan does not fall back to Common Name hostname matching when any subjectAlternativeName is present. The exposure is limited to deployments using DN name constraints, which are uncommon outside internal PKIs, and to certificates without a subjectAlternativeName. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.0.10hCVE-2026-113618——
——0The ZSIRep client library (ZSIREP.CLIENT.DLL) is vulnerable to improper server certificate validation. It registers a process-wide .NET callback that accepts any certificate for HTTPS connections without verification. This allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to impersonate the ZSIRep server and intercept or modify authentication data and documents. The callback persists after the client is closed, weakening other HTTPS connections in the same application.
The issue was fixed in version 2.12.3.1. The library is used in KS-SOMED (fixed in 2026.03.0.01), KS-PPS (fixed in 2026.03.1.0), KS-MEDIS (fixed in 2026.03.0.0), KS-SOLAB (fixed in 2026.3.1.0), and KS-ASW (fixed in 2026.3.0.1).14hCVE-2026-1233067.4 ALT—
——0In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 improper checks allowed server certificates to be added to the trust store during headless runs11hCVE-2026-111494—5.5%
——2Incorrect validation of TLS certificates in the MatchPoint Android app due to a TrustManager that accepts any certificate and a permissive hostname validator. Additionally, the app allows unencrypted HTTP traffic. An attacker capable of intercepting the victim's traffic could read and modify communications, including credentials and personal data.1dCVE-2026-1167897.4 ALT7.5%
——2FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.2, dtls_state_setup() compared a peer certificate with the SDP a=fingerprint only when FreeSWITCH was the DTLS client, not when it held the DTLS server role. An unauthenticated peer able to reach the negotiated media port could complete the DTLS-SRTP handshake with an unrelated certificate, obtain the leg's SRTP keys, decrypt and inject media, and displace the legitimate endpoint; on ICE-enabled legs the peer also needs the connectivity-check credentials from SDP, which generally requires signaling visibility or a position on its path. WebRTC and SIP DTLS-SRTP legs are affected whenever the peer selects the active role, while FreeSWITCH client-role handshakes already perform fingerprint validation. Version 1.11.2 introduces the remediation, which requires rtp_dtls_client_cert_verify_mode=fingerprint.1dCVE-2026-964538.0 ALT6.3%
——2A flaw was found in the Keycloak Admin CLI kcadm tool, which is used by administrators to manage Keycloak servers from the command line. When a custom truststore is provided to verify the server identity, the tool incorrectly accepts any self-signed certificate as long as the hostname matches. This allows a network attacker to impersonate the Keycloak server, steal administrative credentials, and perform unauthorized management actions.15h