PULSE
FEED
← Todos os CVEs
CVE Watch6 de nov. de 2026

CVE-2026-116239

In server mode pgAdmin 4 keeps an account per authentication source, so the same username can exist as, for example, an internal account and

CVSS

8.5

Alta

EPSS

0.4%

p35

KEV

—

Exploit Today

10

0-100

Publicado: 30 de out. de 2026 · Última mod.: 6 de nov. de 2026 · CWE-287 · CWE-639

EPSS · 30d
0.4%EPSS · 30 dias0.4%
2026-10-312026-11-07
Descrição técnica

In server mode pgAdmin 4 keeps an account per authentication source, so the same username can exist as, for example, an internal account and an LDAP account. After LDAP or Kerberos authenticated a user, pgAdmin chose the account to log in by username alone, or took the account Flask-Security's login form had looked up, without checking that it came from the source that authenticated the user. The session therefore belonged to another account, with its role, its servers and its saved database passwords: - An LDAP or Kerberos user whose username matched an internal account was logged in as that internal account, including the administrator account created when pgAdmin is first set up. - With internal authentication listed before LDAP or Kerberos in AUTHENTICATION_SOURCES, the login form's internal validation looks up the account whose email was typed and keeps it even though its password does not match. A Kerberos user could type another Kerberos user's principal and be logged in as that user, and an LDAP user could do the same with an LDAP account whose email is their username. Exploitation requires valid credentials for an LDAP directory or Kerberos realm that pgAdmin is configured to use. The fix looks the account up by the authenticated username and the source that authenticated it, and no longer uses the account the login form found for any source but internal authentication. Internal authentication logs in that account only if it is an internal account. Desktop mode is not affected. This issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.19.

Referências oficiais
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-1235227.1 ALT
—
———Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read any task by injecting a crafted task object into a no-op Kanban bucket move. Attackers can set task.id to a victim task and task.project_id to their own project, routing full task contents to their webhook and forging mention notifications.6h
CVE-2026-1235184.3 MÉD
—
———Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in TaskBucket.CanUpdate, which checks write access to the bucket's project and to the task separately but never verifies that both belong to the same project. Authenticated users with write access to two projects can move a task into another project's kanban bucket. This persists cross-project task_buckets rows that count toward bucket limits and, for done buckets, toggle the task's done state.6h
CVE-2026-1235035.4 MÉD
—
———Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in canDoBucket that allows users with project write access to delete buckets via a mismatched view ID. Attackers can request deletion through another view's bucket endpoint to bypass the last-bucket rule, leaving dangling default/done bucket references and inconsistent task buckets.6h
CVE-2026-1239637.3 ALT
—
——0A security vulnerability has been detected in OpenBMB Internet of Agents up to 9d78e88e47160eb42ee1ee8538c05e1c2c47877a. The impacted element is the function register of the file im_server/app.py of the component Agent Registry. Such manipulation of the argument desc/name leads to missing authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.19h
CVE-2026-1238615.3 MÉD
—
——0Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in CrocoBlock JetFormBuilder – Hierarchical Select jet-form-builder-hierarchical-select allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects JetFormBuilder – Hierarchical Select: from n/a through 1.0.10.13h
CVE-2026-1180669.1 CRÍ
—
——0The Appointment Booking Plugin – LatePoint | Calendar & Scheduling for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via Account Takeover in all versions up to, and including, 5.7.6. This is due to the `OsModel::build_conditions_query()` function in `lib/models/model.php` comparing WHERE-clause values against the literal strings `'IS NULL'` and `'IS NOT NULL'` and concatenating a match directly into SQL without binding it as a parameter, a flaw that neither `sanitize_text_field()` nor the 5.7.5 `is_scalar()` hardening guard closes, since both pass the scalar sentinel through unchanged. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send `params[password_reset_token]=IS NOT NULL` to the public `customer_cabinet__change_password` AJAX route to match every non-null `account_nonse` value, resolving to the lowest-id customer and overwriting that customer's password to an attacker-chosen value — granting full access to their bookings, orders, and PII, and, when the `wp_users_as_customers` option is enabled, takeover of the linked WordPress subscriber or customer-role account. The attacker can first identify the target customer's email by sending `params[order_intent_key]=IS NOT NULL` to the public `steps__start_from_order_intent` route, which returns the name and email from the first matching order intent, and can then self-arm the required 15-minute password-reset freshness window by triggering a reset for that customer directly.20h