CVE-2026-97204
Deleting a label compared the ID of the repository in the request against the organization ID of organization labels, and the two ID sequenc
CVSS
3.1
Baixa
EPSS
0.2%
p8
KEV
—
Exploit Today
2
0-100
Publicado: 18 de out. de 2026 · Última mod.: 19 de out. de 2026 · CWE-863
0.1%EPSS · 30 dias0.2%
2026-10-192026-11-06
Deleting a label compared the ID of the repository in the request against the organization ID of organization labels, and the two ID sequences overlap. A user with write access to the issues of a repository could therefore delete the labels of an organization that has the same numeric ID as that repository. Labels are now deleted only within their own repository or organization.
- blog.gitea.comhttps://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.2.0/
- github.comhttps://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39743
- github.comhttps://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39752
- github.comhttps://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.2.0
- github.comhttps://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-fxq4-gr55-7x5g
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-1182678.1 ALT—
———The WP Data Access – App Builder for Tables, Forms, Dashboards, Charts & Maps plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Incorrect Authorization leading to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.89 This is due to the plugin's write endpoints (`wpda/app/update`, `wpda/app/delete`, `wpda/app/insert`) passing the attacker-supplied `key` and `val` parameters directly to `$wpdadb->update`, `$wpdadb->delete`, and `$wpdadb->insert` without enforcing the container's row-filter (`defaultWhere`) or per-column allow-list (`isSelected`) restrictions that are correctly applied on the read endpoints. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to write to arbitrary rows and columns outside the configured restrictions — including overwriting the `user_pass` field of the WordPress administrator account in `wp_users` — and subsequently authenticate as the administrator, achieving full site takeover. Exploitation requires an administrator to have published a Data App that enables write transactions (update, delete, or insert) for Subscriber-level or anonymous users, which is an explicitly advertised use-case of the plugin. Exploitation by unauthenticated attackers requires that the administrator has published a Data App whose rest_api.authorization is 'anonymous' and whose container has transactions.update (or delete/insert) enabled. On a default installation, where that is not configured, the vulnerability requires attackers with subscriber-level access and above.7hCVE-2026-186894.3 MÉD—
———IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow an authenticated user to obtain limited information about other organizations due to incorrect authorization. A token issued for a limited purpose is accepted where it should not be, which could reveal the names of other organizations.14hCVE-2026-173787.7 ALT—
———IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to broken object-level authorization.14hCVE-2026-173737.7 ALT—
———IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization.14hCVE-2026-173438.1 ALT—
———IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass authorization checks to access or modify sensitive information due to improper authorization.14hCVE-2026-167115.3 MÉD—
———IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to inject platform credentials into outbound requests due to improper input validation. A validation check is not sufficiently strict, which could cause platform credentials to be included in outbound requests.14h