PULSE
FEED
ransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington andStallings · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. · IT · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Cogent Biosciences, Inc. · US · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Chartboost LLC · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Centrepoint · SA · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Resource Consultants · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Hallmark Cards, Inc. · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Scry Analytics · US · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a ZipAI · VN · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... R...ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington andStallings · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. · IT · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Cogent Biosciences, Inc. · US · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Chartboost LLC · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Centrepoint · SA · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Resource Consultants · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Hallmark Cards, Inc. · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Scry Analytics · US · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a ZipAI · VN · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... R...ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Services
CVE Watch408.844 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

4,383na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,768
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,718
  • Alta
    22,249
  • Média
    21,712
  • Baixa
    2,171
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades921–960 · 4,383
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2024-29617.3 ALT
99.8%
——30The iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.39 and older may overflow the output buffer passed to it by up to 4 bytes when converting strings to the ISO-2022-CN-EXT character set, which may be used to crash an application or overwrite a neighbouring variable.2d
CVE-2020-53987.5 ALT
99.8%
——30In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.29d
CVE-2020-8193—
99.8%
KEV—80Citrix ADC, Gateway, and SD-WAN WANOP Appliance Authorization Bypass Vulnerability—
CVE-2024-21683—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2012-1452—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2010-01887.8 ALT
99.8%
KEVR80Adobe Reader and Acrobat Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability84d
CVE-2018-81747.5 ALT
99.8%
KEVR80Microsoft Windows VBScript Engine Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability85d
CVE-2012-1448—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-412659.6 CRÍ
99.8%
KEVR80Qlik Sense HTTP Tunneling Vulnerability93d
CVE-2023-36025—
99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Windows SmartScreen Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability—
CVE-2015-0240—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2026-244239.8 CRÍ
99.8%
KEVR80SmarterTools SmarterMail Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability94d
CVE-2023-49285—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2021-20837—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2019-7192—
99.8%
KEVR80QNAP Photo Station Improper Access Control Vulnerability—
CVE-2020-35729—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2024-25617—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2018-19207—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2022-0540—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2021-21973—
99.8%
KEV—80VMware vCenter Server and Cloud Foundation Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability—
CVE-2025-4428—
99.8%
KEV—80Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) Code Injection Vulnerability—
CVE-2018-1000115—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2022-1190—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2025-29635—
99.8%
KEV—80D-Link DIR-823X Command Injection Vulnerability—
CVE-2022-30781—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2017-17411—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2021-3122—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2003-0718—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2022-27593—
99.8%
KEVR80QNAP Photo Station Externally Controlled Reference Vulnerability—
CVE-2024-26256—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2014-0221—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2024-361049.1 CRÍ
99.8%
——30Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.14. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.14, which fixes the issue.3d
CVE-2018-7357—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2009-0658—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2021-37119.8 CRÍ
99.8%
——30In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).29d
CVE-2020-8605—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2024-58136—
99.8%
KEV—80Yiiframework Yii Improper Protection of Alternate Path Vulnerability—
CVE-2009-1429—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2012-1421—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2016-6415—
99.8%
KEV—80Cisco IOS, IOS XR, and IOS XE IKEv1 Information Disclosure Vulnerability—