Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje
413,525na visualização atual
Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.
No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707
Distribuição · última janela
- Crítica5,739
- Alta22,705
- Média21,204
- Baixa2,175
Filtros
Janela
Severidade
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2010-2091—97.2%
——29——CVE-2017-8975—97.2%
——29——CVE-2002-0692—97.2%
——29——CVE-2010-2259—97.2%
——29——CVE-2022-40152—97.2%
——29——CVE-2017-8976—97.2%
——29——CVE-2021-24867—97.2%
——29——CVE-2017-2984—97.2%
——29——CVE-2016-4555—97.2%
——29——CVE-2017-0238—97.2%
——29——CVE-1999-0385—97.2%
——29——CVE-2022-42139—97.2%
——29——CVE-2020-7012—97.2%
——29——CVE-2018-16364—97.2%
——29——CVE-2015-2493—97.2%
——29——CVE-2001-0053—97.2%
——29——CVE-2017-0196—97.2%
——29——CVE-2016-2324—97.2%
——29——CVE-2022-208667.4 ALT97.2%
——29A vulnerability in the handling of RSA keys on devices running Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve an RSA private key. This vulnerability is due to a logic error when the RSA key is stored in memory on a hardware platform that performs hardware-based cryptography. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a Lenstra side-channel attack against the targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve the RSA private key. The following conditions may be observed on an affected device: This vulnerability will apply to approximately 5 percent of the RSA keys on a device that is running a vulnerable release of Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software; not all RSA keys are expected to be affected due to mathematical calculations applied to the RSA key. The RSA key could be valid but have specific characteristics that make it vulnerable to the potential leak of the RSA private key. If an attacker obtains the RSA private key, they could use the key to impersonate a device that is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software or to decrypt the device traffic. See the Indicators of Compromise section for more information on the detection of this type of RSA key. The RSA key could be malformed and invalid. A malformed RSA key is not functional, and a TLS client connection to a device that is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software that uses the malformed RSA key will result in a TLS signature failure, which means a vulnerable software release created an invalid RSA signature that failed verification. If an attacker obtains the RSA private key, they could use the key to impersonate a device that is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software or to decrypt the device traffic.92dCVE-2021-251227.5 ALT97.2%
——29When responding to new h2c connection requests, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 could duplicate request headers and a limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user A and user B could both see the results of user A's request.34dCVE-2021-31249—97.2%
——29——CVE-2026-209256.5 MÉD97.2%
——29External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.104dCVE-2018-0922—97.2%
——29——CVE-2014-8801—97.2%
——29——CVE-1999-0349—97.2%
——29——CVE-2022-24314—97.2%
——29——CVE-2021-33055—97.2%
——29——CVE-2025-3983—97.2%
——29——CVE-2006-5646—97.2%
——29——CVE-2019-12624—97.2%
——29——CVE-2021-270789.1 CRÍ97.2%
——29Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability85dCVE-2023-40787—97.2%
——29——CVE-2000-097310.0 SEM97.2%
——29Buffer overflow in curl earlier than 6.0-1.1, and curl-ssl earlier than 6.0-1.2, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands by forcing a long error message to be generated.50dCVE-2016-7277—97.2%
——29——CVE-2017-8954—97.2%
——29——CVE-2014-9029—97.2%
——29——CVE-2019-0842—97.2%
——29——CVE-2024-2887—97.2%
——29——CVE-2011-1266—97.2%
——29——CVE-2020-9425—97.2%
——29——