PULSE
FEED
ransomakira reclama a Ligne Roset · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Houston Machine and Thread · US · Manufacturingransomdirewolf reclama a Algonomy · US · Technologyransomobsoft reclama a Company #6ransomakira reclama a Hudson & Hudson SignProducts · US · Manufacturingransomshiba reclama a Istituto Borgo · IT · Otherransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington andStallings · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. · IT · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Cogent Biosciences, Inc. · US · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Chartboost LLC · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Centrepoint · SA · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Resource Consultants · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Ligne Roset · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Houston Machine and Thread · US · Manufacturingransomdirewolf reclama a Algonomy · US · Technologyransomobsoft reclama a Company #6ransomakira reclama a Hudson & Hudson SignProducts · US · Manufacturingransomshiba reclama a Istituto Borgo · IT · Otherransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington andStallings · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. · IT · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Cogent Biosciences, Inc. · US · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Chartboost LLC · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Centrepoint · SA · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Resource Consultants · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerce
CVE Watch408.844 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

4,383na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,768
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,642
  • Alta
    21,929
  • Média
    21,128
  • Baixa
    2,126
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades1,441–1,480 · 4,383
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2019-10092—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2023-32031—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2016-2098—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2021-21628—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2017-0290—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2021-35216—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2010-2883—
99.6%
KEV—80Adobe Acrobat and Reader Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability—
CVE-2021-2456—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2021-33543—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2017-11826—
99.6%
KEV—80Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability—
CVE-2022-40770—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2003-0344—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2025-34300—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2024-2054—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2017-8779—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2021-30128—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2003-0719—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2024-54003—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2023-24488—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2015-3827—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2016-8870—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2014-9195—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2021-31955—
99.6%
KEV—80Microsoft Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability—
CVE-2019-1003002—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2023-36932—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2011-0923—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2019-17602—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2013-4212—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2014-7862—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2024-43468—
99.6%
KEV—80Microsoft Configuration Manager SQL Injection Vulnerability—
CVE-2019-9621—
99.6%
KEV—80Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability—
CVE-2017-10974—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2024-53675—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2022-31704—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2017-0262—
99.6%
KEV—80Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability—
CVE-2016-72557.8 ALT
99.6%
KEVR80Microsoft Win32k Privilege Escalation Vulnerability58d
CVE-2016-5734—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2021-38540—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2022-25148—
99.6%
——30——
CVE-2024-2041910.0 CRÍ
99.6%
——30A vulnerability in the authentication system of Cisco Smart Software Manager On-Prem (SSM On-Prem) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to change the password of any user, including administrative users. This vulnerability is due to improper implementation of the password-change process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access the web UI or API with the privileges of the compromised user.3d