PULSE
FEED
ransombarracuda reclama a ProLiant · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a The University of Texas at Arlington · US · Educationransomqilin reclama a York University · CA · Educationransommedusalocker reclama a Depransomplay reclama a Minor League Baseball · US · Hospitalityransomn0n reclama a Company #213 · QAransomn0n reclama a Company #212 · ETransomdoommageddon reclama a K**** T**** H**** B****ransomcurious worm reclama a sacheminc.com · CA · Manufacturingransomcurious worm reclama a sbhny.org · USransomcurious worm reclama a shannonhealth.com · IE · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a baronandbudd.com · GB · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a ki*****o.comransomcurious worm reclama a raleighortho.com · US · Healthcareransombarracuda reclama a ProLiant · US · Technologyransomqilin reclama a The University of Texas at Arlington · US · Educationransomqilin reclama a York University · CA · Educationransommedusalocker reclama a Depransomplay reclama a Minor League Baseball · US · Hospitalityransomn0n reclama a Company #213 · QAransomn0n reclama a Company #212 · ETransomdoommageddon reclama a K**** T**** H**** B****ransomcurious worm reclama a sacheminc.com · CA · Manufacturingransomcurious worm reclama a sbhny.org · USransomcurious worm reclama a shannonhealth.com · IE · Healthcareransomcurious worm reclama a baronandbudd.com · GB · Professional Servicesransomeverstake reclama a ki*****o.comransomcurious worm reclama a raleighortho.com · US · Healthcare
CVE Watch413.655 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

413,655na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,631
  • Alta
    22,527
  • Média
    21,016
  • Baixa
    2,145
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades15,321–15,360 · 413,655
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2016-7152—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2017-16381—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-36258—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-5393—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2008-1767—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2005-2629—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2014-8498—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-05827.8 ALT
96.3%
——29A memory leak flaw was found in the Linux kernel’s io_uring functionality in how a user registers a buffer ring with IORING_REGISTER_PBUF_RING, mmap() it, and then frees it. This flaw allows a local user to crash or potentially escalate their privileges on the system.8d
CVE-2017-16392—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2014-3576—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2007-3697—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2023-31185—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2007-6613—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-34854—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2005-1214—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2025-97454.7 MÉD
96.3%
——29A security vulnerability has been detected in D-Link DI-500WF 14.04.10A1T. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /version_upgrade.asp of the component jhttpd. The manipulation of the argument path leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.25d
CVE-2007-2292—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2014-6043—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2004-2275—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2026-12075.4 MÉD
96.3%
——29An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. Raster lookups on ``RasterField`` (only implemented on PostGIS) allows remote attackers to inject SQL via the band index parameter. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Tarek Nakkouch for reporting this issue.120d
CVE-2023-35036—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2023-37791—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2015-0253—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2017-12373—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2015-9480—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2017-7722—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2024-25832—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2012-0985—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2005-1829—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-1999-0042—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2014-7876—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2011-1851—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2006-2554—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2018-6911—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-1999-0208—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2010-3223—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2013-3358—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2022-2419—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2011-1848—
96.3%
——29——
CVE-2019-15678—
96.3%
——29——