PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch413.805 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

413,805na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,615
  • Alta
    22,524
  • Média
    20,887
  • Baixa
    2,135
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades18,361–18,400 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2018-20019—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2019-7814—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2009-0781—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2023-37979—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2016-3542—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2012-4172—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2018-5723—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2021-33912—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2018-4013—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2016-6802—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2026-222186.5 MÉD
95.6%
——29Chainlit versions prior to 2.9.4 contain an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the /project/element update flow. An authenticated client can send a custom Element with a user-controlled path value, causing the server to copy the referenced file into the attacker’s session. The resulting element identifier (chainlitKey) can then be used to retrieve the file contents via /project/file/<chainlitKey>, allowing disclosure of any file readable by the Chainlit service.121d
CVE-2008-2006—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2000-0775—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2009-0410—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2018-9010—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2008-6998—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2002-2272—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2015-4047—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2022-22588—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2017-8695—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2026-87118.1 ALT
95.6%
——29NGINX JavaScript has a vulnerability when the js_fetch_proxy directive is configured with at least one client-controlled NGINX variable (for example, $http_*, $arg_*, $cookie_*) and a location invoking the ngx.fetch() operation from NGINX JavaScript. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests. This may cause a heap buffer overflow in the NGINX worker process leading to a restart. Additionally, attackers can execute code on systems with Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) disabled or when the attacker can bypass ASLR. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.112d
CVE-2004-0486—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-1999-1431—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2014-0567—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2017-7922—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2022-30512—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2008-3702—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2014-9158—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2019-7830—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2007-2079—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2023-26876—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2023-46977—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2014-9159—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2019-7786—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2014-9116—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2009-2693—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2000-09917.5 SEM
95.6%
——29Buffer overflow in Hilgraeve, Inc. HyperTerminal client on Windows 98, ME, and 2000 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long telnet URL, aka the "HyperTerminal Buffer Overflow" vulnerability.50d
CVE-2000-0179—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2025-40599—
95.6%
——29——
CVE-2010-2415—
95.6%
——29——