PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch413.805 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

413,805na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,615
  • Alta
    22,524
  • Média
    20,884
  • Baixa
    2,135
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades18,601–18,640 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2019-7822—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2020-8868—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2006-1728—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2021-253297.0 ALT
95.5%
——29The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.41, 8.5.0 to 8.5.61 or 7.0.0. to 7.0.107 with a configuration edge case that was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.35d
CVE-2022-32275—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2013-2576—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2018-12784—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2008-3996—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-6490—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2002-1178—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2010-1722—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2002-0068—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2000-0202—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2013-1299—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-1999-0926—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2020-16199—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2009-3874—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2006-6740—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-0802—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2009-2109—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2011-0742—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2020-25858—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2011-1470—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2017-14064—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-2544—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2024-300877.8 ALT
95.5%
——29Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability115d
CVE-2017-3059—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2007-4504—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-7259—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-2543—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2018-18793—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2013-5948—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2010-1474—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-7800—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2025-599349.4 CRÍ
95.5%
——29Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.24d
CVE-2007-2390—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2005-0838—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2017-9789—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2007-2677—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2014-9374—
95.5%
——29——