PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch413.805 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

413,805na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,599
  • Alta
    22,477
  • Média
    20,790
  • Baixa
    2,126
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades19,201–19,240 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2004-1264—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-0827—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-0676—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2025-53833—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2014-3004—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2006-2175—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2015-0323—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2019-5788—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-21894—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2010-3804—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-1702—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2025-0566—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2010-3613—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2017-11293—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-6631—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-15768—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2026-25769—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-4974—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2026-2315—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2013-43224.3 SEM
95.4%
——29Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 processes chunked transfer coding without properly handling (1) a large total amount of chunked data or (2) whitespace characters in an HTTP header value within a trailer field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by streaming data. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-3544.34d
CVE-2018-4980—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2020-1444—
95.3%
——29——
CVE-2026-327487.5 ALT
95.4%
——29Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Prior to version 7.5, due to premature release of resource during expected lifetime and heap Use-After-Free bugs, Squid is vulnerable to Denial of Service when handling ICP traffic. This problem allows a remote attacker to perform a reliable and repeatable Denial of Service attack against the Squid service using ICP protocol. This attack is limited to Squid deployments that explicitly enable ICP support (i.e. configure non-zero `icp_port`). This problem _cannot_ be mitigated by denying ICP queries using `icp_access` rules. This bug is fixed in Squid version 7.5.121d
CVE-2007-1700—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2019-7844—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-45672—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2004-2476—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2025-7776—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2002-1984—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-6184—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2019-12422—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2003-0044—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2023-4174—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-0813—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2010-1982—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-25434—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2003-0253—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-10063—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2002-1383—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-1999-0262—
95.4%
——29——