PULSE
FEED
ransompanzer reclama a Ministry of Health Malaysia · MY · Government & Defenseransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransompanzer reclama a Ministry of Health Malaysia · MY · Government & Defenseransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technology
CVE Watch413.805 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

413,805na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,594
  • Alta
    22,456
  • Média
    20,779
  • Baixa
    2,126
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades20,841–20,880 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2012-4301—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2002-0483—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2009-1788—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2015-2368—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2019-0548—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2020-9488—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2026-84387.2 ALT
95.0%
——28The All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to and including 5.4.7. This is due to insufficient input sanitization in the get_rest_route() function and missing output escaping in the column_default() method of the debug log list table. When the 'Disable REST API for non-logged in users' feature (aiowps_disallow_unauthorized_rest_requests) is enabled alongside debug logging (aiowps_enable_debug), an unauthenticated attacker can embed arbitrary HTML or JavaScript in the REST request path. The path is retrieved via urldecode($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']), which decodes URL-encoded payloads into literal HTML characters. This decoded, unsanitized value is concatenated directly into a debug log message and stored in the database. When an administrator navigates to the AIOS Dashboard Debug Logs page, the column_default() method returns the raw database value without escaping, and the parent list table echoes it directly, causing JavaScript execution in the administrator's browser session. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute when an administrator views the debug log page, enabling nonce theft, privileged AJAX/REST actions, and potential full site compromise.113d
CVE-2006-6143—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2008-7269—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2018-20182—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2017-8522—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2015-1561—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2004-0642—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2011-0284—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2009-2204—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2024-40348—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2018-1000773—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2020-8853—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2019-8271—
95.0%
——28——
CVE-2013-0612—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2009-0418—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2003-0118—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2020-10967—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-3963—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-7251—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-15172—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2006-3475—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-16645—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2021-39165—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2017-9614—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2010-1478—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2012-4354—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-10184—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2007-3621—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2020-8877—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2006-0922—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2006-0527—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-3276—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-11369—
94.9%
——28——
CVE-2010-1473—
94.9%
——28——