Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje
409,857na visualização atual
Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.
No catálogo KEV1,769
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700
Distribuição · última janela
- Crítica5,527
- Alta21,042
- Média20,196
- Baixa2,086
Filtros
Janela
Severidade
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2009-1429—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1445—99.8%
——30——CVE-2014-0221—99.8%
——30——CVE-2021-35590—99.8%
——30——CVE-2000-0778—99.8%
——30——CVE-2015-2342—99.8%
——30——CVE-2008-5416—99.8%
——30——CVE-2003-0545—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-6895—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-35729—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-43425—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-32563—99.8%
——30——CVE-2021-37119.8 CRÍ99.8%
——30In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).30dCVE-2013-1488—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-10546—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-39361—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-29617.3 ALT99.8%
——30The iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.39 and older may overflow the output buffer passed to it by up to 4 bytes when converting strings to the ISO-2022-CN-EXT character set, which may be used to crash an application or overwrite a neighbouring variable.4dCVE-2018-5999—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-27316—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-12720—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-40504—99.8%
——30——CVE-2015-3864—99.8%
——30——CVE-2003-0722—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-21683—99.8%
——30——CVE-2022-31706—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1454—99.8%
——30——CVE-2021-32305—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-49285—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1439—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-15867—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-361049.1 CRÍ99.8%
——30Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.14.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.14, which fixes the issue.4dCVE-2018-7357—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1421—99.8%
——30——CVE-2017-12611—99.8%
——30——CVE-2013-2028—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-53987.5 ALT99.8%
——30In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input.30dCVE-2022-0540—99.8%
——30——CVE-2019-11409—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-27983—99.8%
——30——CVE-2006-0026—99.8%
——30——