PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Kayaku Safety Systems Malaysia Sdn Bhd · MY · Manufacturingransomscarlettgroup reclama a fittleworth.com · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransombarracuda reclama a FINSA · ES · Financial Servicesransomnetrunner reclama a F***** G****** C********** C*** · USransomendzone reclama a Momentum Telecom · Technologyransomendzone reclama a Absolute Bail Bonds · US · Financial Servicesransomeverest reclama a Grundbaulabor Trier GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomnetrunner reclama a I****** A***** · KWransominterlock reclama a K&A Industries · USransomeverest reclama a Final Notice Before Publication · Otherransompanzer reclama a RE/MAX Germany · DE · Professional Servicesransomcurious worm reclama a i*t*r***t.com · Technologyransomcurious worm reclama a t**a.comransomplay reclama a Frey Properties of Highland LLC · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Kayaku Safety Systems Malaysia Sdn Bhd · MY · Manufacturingransomscarlettgroup reclama a fittleworth.com · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransombarracuda reclama a FINSA · ES · Financial Servicesransomnetrunner reclama a F***** G****** C********** C*** · USransomendzone reclama a Momentum Telecom · Technologyransomendzone reclama a Absolute Bail Bonds · US · Financial Servicesransomeverest reclama a Grundbaulabor Trier GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomnetrunner reclama a I****** A***** · KWransominterlock reclama a K&A Industries · USransomeverest reclama a Final Notice Before Publication · Otherransompanzer reclama a RE/MAX Germany · DE · Professional Servicesransomcurious worm reclama a i*t*r***t.com · Technologyransomcurious worm reclama a t**a.comransomplay reclama a Frey Properties of Highland LLC · US · Retail & E-Commerce
CVE Watch414.784 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

414,784na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,781
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,709

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,284
  • Alta
    20,832
  • Média
    19,524
  • Baixa
    2,048
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades25,041–25,080 · 414,784
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2006-5762—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2005-1681—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2005-1992—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2003-0833—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-3996—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2021-28312—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2009-0071—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2021-371377.5 ALT
93.9%
——28The Snappy frame decoder function doesn't restrict the chunk length which may lead to excessive memory usage. Beside this it also may buffer reserved skippable chunks until the whole chunk was received which may lead to excessive memory usage as well. This vulnerability can be triggered by supplying malicious input that decompresses to a very big size (via a network stream or a file) or by sending a huge skippable chunk.38d
CVE-2012-4406—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2017-3119—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2004-1125—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2015-4695—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2025-2135—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-4436—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2009-0113—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2006-3893—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2020-10885—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2025-32819—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2002-0677—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-7764—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-16224—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2018-6289—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2008-4211—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2007-1614—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2025-5902—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2019-7762—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2025-14700—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2014-8770—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2009-1791—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2023-34465.3 MÉD
93.9%
——28Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.32d
CVE-2022-36979—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-5300—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2017-12246—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2015-8447—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2004-1945—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2013-5673—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2011-1419—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2008-2930—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2016-10140—
93.9%
——28——
CVE-2008-7319—
93.9%
——28——