Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje
414,784na visualização atual
Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.
No catálogo KEV1,781
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,709
Distribuição · última janela
- Crítica5,284
- Alta20,829
- Média19,516
- Baixa2,047
Filtros
Janela
Severidade
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-2621610.0 CRÍ93.7%
——28Crawl4AI versions prior to 0.8.0 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the Docker API deployment. The /crawl endpoint accepts a hooks parameter containing Python code that is executed using exec(). The __import__ builtin was included in the allowed builtins, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to import arbitrary modules and execute system commands. Successful exploitation allows full server compromise, including arbitrary command execution, file read and write access, sensitive data exfiltration, and lateral movement within internal networks.38dCVE-2017-7040—93.7%
——28——CVE-2018-0500—93.7%
——28——CVE-2024-22611—93.7%
——28——CVE-2017-2479—93.7%
——28——CVE-2007-3932—93.7%
——28——CVE-2006-6690—93.7%
——28——CVE-2018-12830—93.7%
——28——CVE-2007-3750—93.7%
——28——CVE-2011-4507—93.7%
——28——CVE-2020-11135.3 MÉD93.7%
——28A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows when the Task Scheduler service fails to properly verify client connections over RPC. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code as an administrator. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.
To exploit this vulnerability, a man-in-the-middle attacker would need to send a specially crafted request to a vulnerable system.
The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Task Scheduler service validates connections.88dCVE-2015-5553—93.7%
——28——CVE-2008-3961—93.7%
——28——CVE-2007-2809—93.7%
——28——CVE-2012-5575—93.7%
——28——CVE-2015-5552—93.7%
——28——CVE-2005-0034—93.7%
——28——CVE-2012-3374—93.7%
——28——CVE-2008-6752—93.7%
——28——CVE-2014-0604—93.7%
——28——CVE-2010-3436—93.7%
——28——CVE-2013-0714—93.7%
——28——CVE-2009-4091—93.7%
——28——CVE-2018-8579—93.7%
——28——CVE-2013-1402—93.7%
——28——CVE-2016-1503—93.7%
——28——CVE-2019-8317—93.7%
——28——CVE-2013-0013—93.7%
——28——CVE-2017-15099—93.7%
——28——CVE-2013-1636—93.7%
——28——CVE-2010-5194—93.7%
——28——CVE-2004-2491—93.7%
——28——CVE-2013-0750—93.7%
——28——CVE-2016-5626—93.7%
——28——CVE-2020-22165—93.7%
——28——CVE-2006-0056—93.7%
——28——CVE-2021-42230—93.7%
——28——CVE-2021-45814—93.7%
——28——CVE-2006-5159—93.7%
——28——CVE-2018-15536—93.7%
——28——