PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Kayaku Safety Systems Malaysia Sdn Bhd · MY · Manufacturingransomscarlettgroup reclama a fittleworth.com · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransombarracuda reclama a FINSA · ES · Financial Servicesransomnetrunner reclama a F***** G****** C********** C*** · USransomendzone reclama a Momentum Telecom · Technologyransomendzone reclama a Absolute Bail Bonds · US · Financial Servicesransomeverest reclama a Grundbaulabor Trier GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomnetrunner reclama a I****** A***** · KWransominterlock reclama a K&A Industries · USransomeverest reclama a Final Notice Before Publication · Otherransompanzer reclama a RE/MAX Germany · DE · Professional Servicesransomcurious worm reclama a i*t*r***t.com · Technologyransomcurious worm reclama a t**a.comransomplay reclama a Frey Properties of Highland LLC · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomqilin reclama a Kayaku Safety Systems Malaysia Sdn Bhd · MY · Manufacturingransomscarlettgroup reclama a fittleworth.com · GB · Retail & E-Commerceransombarracuda reclama a FINSA · ES · Financial Servicesransomnetrunner reclama a F***** G****** C********** C*** · USransomendzone reclama a Momentum Telecom · Technologyransomendzone reclama a Absolute Bail Bonds · US · Financial Servicesransomeverest reclama a Grundbaulabor Trier GmbH · DE · Manufacturingransomnetrunner reclama a I****** A***** · KWransominterlock reclama a K&A Industries · USransomeverest reclama a Final Notice Before Publication · Otherransompanzer reclama a RE/MAX Germany · DE · Professional Servicesransomcurious worm reclama a i*t*r***t.com · Technologyransomcurious worm reclama a t**a.comransomplay reclama a Frey Properties of Highland LLC · US · Retail & E-Commerce
CVE Watch414.804 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

414,804na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,781
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,709

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,287
  • Alta
    20,832
  • Média
    19,517
  • Baixa
    2,047
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades26,081–26,120 · 414,804
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2012-4250—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2011-0226—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2006-5101—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2002-1251—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2007-5063—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2019-12406—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2017-10352—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2024-7907—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2019-17142—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2014-3572—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2010-2873—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2023-28288—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2009-2334—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2007-0466—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2011-1167—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-1999-0771—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2011-0333—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2016-4120—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2007-0104—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2020-10627.5 ALT
93.7%
——28A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, the attacker could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. An attacker could host a specially crafted website designed to exploit the vulnerability through Internet Explorer and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites, or websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements, by adding specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. However, in all cases an attacker would have no way to force a user to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince a user to take action, typically by an enticement in an email or instant message, or by getting the user to open an attachment sent through email. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Internet Explorer handles objects in memory.88d
CVE-2026-5972610.0 CRÍ
93.7%
——28Ruflo is an agent meta-harness for Claude Code and Codex. Prior to 3.16.3, ruflo's default docker-compose deployment exposed the MCP bridge POST /mcp and POST /mcp/:group endpoints without authentication, allowing an unauthenticated network attacker to invoke tools/call to terminal_execute, obtain a shell in the bridge container, read provider API keys, and poison AgentDB learning-store patterns. This issue is fixed in version 3.16.3.21d
CVE-2009-3798—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2018-7474—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2009-3969—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2018-8097—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2001-0147—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2002-1441—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2015-7663—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2005-4438—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2010-0496—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2014-4968—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2016-8624—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2014-9190—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2015-5461—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2009-3797—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-1999-0579—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2016-6207—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2017-1000037—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2019-5021—
93.7%
——28——
CVE-2018-0952—
93.7%
——28——