Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje
409,857na visualização atual
Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.
No catálogo KEV1,769
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700
Distribuição · última janela
- Crítica5,526
- Alta21,042
- Média20,196
- Baixa2,086
Filtros
Janela
Severidade
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2015-2080—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-388368.8 ALT99.5%
——30File Upload vulnerability in BoidCMS v.2.0.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by adding a GIF header to bypass MIME type checks.122dCVE-2019-1937—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-4220—99.5%
——30——CVE-2007-6388—99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-41303—99.5%
——30——CVE-2009-0837—99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-213445.3 MÉD99.5%
——30XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.16, there is a vulnerability which may allow a remote attacker to load and execute arbitrary code from a remote host only by manipulating the processed input stream. No user is affected, who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's security framework with a whitelist limited to the minimal required types. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.16.32dCVE-2025-9491—99.5%
——30——CVE-2024-31465—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-48085—99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-416539.8 CRÍ99.5%
——30The PING function on the TP-Link TL-WR840N EU v5 router with firmware through TL-WR840N(EU)_V5_171211 is vulnerable to remote code execution via a crafted payload in an IP address input field.122dCVE-2022-44267—99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-2884—99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-2140—99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-45699—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-3643—99.5%
——30——CVE-2018-9160—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-26506.5 MÉD99.5%
——30Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or
data containing them may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of
the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message
size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those
messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.
An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -
most of which have no size limit. OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate
an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL
type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the
sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by
periods.
When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large
(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds
of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long
time. The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the
sub-identifiers in bytes (*).
With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /
identifiers in string form was introduced. This includes using OBJECT
IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching
algorithms.
Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure
AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify
what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or
decrypt, or digest passed data.
Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are
affected, with any version of OpenSSL. If the use is for the mere purpose
of display, the severity is considered low.
In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,
CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS. It also impacts anything that processes X.509
certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.
The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a
100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain. Additionally, this only
impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client
authentication.
In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,
such as X.509 certificates. This is assumed to not happen in such a way
that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered
not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,
and the severity is therefore considered low.24dCVE-2022-22274—99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-35478—99.5%
——30——CVE-2005-3081—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-40495—99.5%
——30——CVE-2009-2685—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-36745—99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-32429—99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-35951—99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-368998.8 ALT99.5%
——30ASP.NET Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability90dCVE-2022-42425—99.5%
——30——CVE-2024-22120—99.5%
——30——CVE-2024-417309.8 CRÍ99.5%
——30In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence
Platform, if Single Signed On is enabled on Enterprise authentication, an
unauthorized user can get a logon token using a REST endpoint. The attacker can
fully compromise the system resulting in High impact on confidentiality,
integrity and availability.4dCVE-2009-4140—99.5%
——30——CVE-2008-1232—99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-26937—99.5%
——30——CVE-2000-0649—99.5%
——30——CVE-2025-63899.8 CRÍ99.5%
——30The Sneeit Framework plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 8.3 via the sneeit_articles_pagination_callback() function. This is due to the function accepting user input and then passing that through call_user_func(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server which can be leveraged to inject backdoors or, for example, create new administrative user accounts.20dCVE-2011-2371—99.5%
——30——CVE-2026-2041—99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-42429—99.5%
——30——CVE-2010-2550—99.5%
——30——