PULSE
FEED
ransomakira reclama a Ligne Roset · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Houston Machine and Thread · US · Manufacturingransomdirewolf reclama a Algonomy · US · Technologyransomobsoft reclama a Company #6ransomakira reclama a Hudson & Hudson SignProducts · US · Manufacturingransomshiba reclama a Istituto Borgo · IT · Otherransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington andStallings · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. · IT · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Cogent Biosciences, Inc. · US · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Chartboost LLC · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Centrepoint · SA · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Resource Consultants · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Ligne Roset · FR · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Houston Machine and Thread · US · Manufacturingransomdirewolf reclama a Algonomy · US · Technologyransomobsoft reclama a Company #6ransomakira reclama a Hudson & Hudson SignProducts · US · Manufacturingransomshiba reclama a Istituto Borgo · IT · Otherransomakira reclama a Boyle, Pecharich, Cline, Whittington andStallings · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A. · IT · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Cogent Biosciences, Inc. · US · Healthcareransomn0n reclama a Chartboost LLC · US · Technologyransomn0n reclama a Centrepoint · SA · Energy & Utilitiesransomn0n reclama a Resource Consultants · US · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerce
CVE Watch408.844 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

4,383na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,768
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,690
  • Alta
    22,136
  • Média
    21,544
  • Baixa
    2,154
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades3,121–3,160 · 4,383
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2020-26935—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2005-3155—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2011-0647—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2017-11799—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2024-37014—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2022-30547—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2023-43770—
99.2%
KEV—80Roundcube Webmail Persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability—
CVE-2006-5216—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2004-0932—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2015-4068—
99.2%
KEV—80Arcserve Unified Data Protection (UDP) Directory Traversal Vulnerability—
CVE-2021-22681—
99.2%
KEV—80Rockwell Multiple Products Insufficient Protected Credentials Vulnerability—
CVE-2009-4444—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2011-2474—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2024-47175—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2004-0313—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2005-1939—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2023-26475—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2023-35081—
99.2%
KEV—80Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) Path Traversal Vulnerability—
CVE-2013-5019—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2006-3730—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2012-3274—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2018-8735—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2024-50599—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2021-22242—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2021-34495.9 MÉD
99.2%
——30An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).29d
CVE-2021-229018.1 ALT
99.2%
——30curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.23d
CVE-2011-0609—
99.2%
KEV—80Adobe Flash Player Unspecified Vulnerability—
CVE-2004-0212—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2002-0072—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2002-2226—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2016-0777—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2007-5082—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2003-0245—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2008-0067—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2021-21801—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2019-15043—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2019-14205—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2023-50968—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2006-5780—
99.2%
——30——
CVE-2014-3789—
99.2%
——30——