PULSE
ESEN
FEED
ransomn0n reclama a Company #147 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #146 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #145 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #144 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #143 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #142 · KRransomn0n reclama a Company #141 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #140 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #139 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #138 · CAransomsafepay reclama a by.zivor.co.il · ILransomqilin reclama a XK net SA de CV · MXransomqilin reclama a BOSH Engineering Private Limited · SG · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a J. J. Louro Pereira · PT · Otherransomn0n reclama a Company #147 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #146 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #145 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #144 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #143 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #142 · KRransomn0n reclama a Company #141 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #140 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #139 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #138 · CAransomsafepay reclama a by.zivor.co.il · ILransomqilin reclama a XK net SA de CV · MXransomqilin reclama a BOSH Engineering Private Limited · SG · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a J. J. Louro Pereira · PT · Other
CVE Watch409.857 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

409,857na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,769
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,526
  • Alta
    21,042
  • Média
    20,196
  • Baixa
    2,086
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades3,121–3,160 · 409,857
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2025-4009—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-6019—
99.5%
——30——CVE-1999-0128—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2006-5156—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-11854—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2011-33894.3 SEM
99.5%
——30The SSL protocol, as used in certain configurations in Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Opera, and other products, encrypts data by using CBC mode with chained initialization vectors, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain plaintext HTTP headers via a blockwise chosen-boundary attack (BCBA) on an HTTPS session, in conjunction with JavaScript code that uses (1) the HTML5 WebSocket API, (2) the Java URLConnection API, or (3) the Silverlight WebClient API, aka a "BEAST" attack.29dCVE-2007-1674—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2006-1148—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2008-0621—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-3239—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2006-3838—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-13945—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-37918—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2010-1240—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-44142—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2007-1697—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2008-0084—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2024-28255—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-11698—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2025-2777—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2016-2774—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2024-49754—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2020-28578—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-36100—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2012-0261—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2017-17560—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2025-69657.7 ALT
99.5%
——30There exists a vulnerability in SQLite versions before 3.50.2 where the number of aggregate terms could exceed the number of columns available. This could lead to a memory corruption issue. We recommend upgrading to version 3.50.2 or above.4dCVE-2020-8813—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2011-3026—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2009-3867—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2014-0659—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2018-1000130—
99.5%
——30——CVE-1999-0256—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2021-37346—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2012-4958—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-34133—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2023-0126—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2012-0394—
99.5%
——30——CVE-2022-07787.5 ALT
99.5%
——30The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).25dCVE-2017-3144—
99.5%
——30——