CVE-2026-107450
In Stump through 0.1.10, the updateSmartList and deleteSmartList GraphQL mutations (crates/graphql/src/mutation/smart_lists.rs) depend only
CVSS
5.4
Medium
EPSS
0.2%
p11
KEV
—
Exploit Today
3
0-100
Published: Oct 8, 2026 · Last modified: Oct 8, 2026 · CWE-863
0.2%EPSS · 30 days0.2%
2026-10-082026-10-25
In Stump through 0.1.10, the updateSmartList and deleteSmartList GraphQL mutations (crates/graphql/src/mutation/smart_lists.rs) depend only on the shared AccessSmartList permission and resolve the target list at Reader access (lacking a creator check). Any authenticated user with that permission can overwrite, delete, or take over another user's smart list. (updateSmartList sets creatorId to the caller identity, and can set visibility to PRIVATE, locking out the original owner.) NOTE: this is unrelated to the graphql crate on crates.io.
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-938463.8 LOW—
———Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.10 fail to restrict which built-in roles can be assigned to a team member via the API, which allows a team admin to grant a team member permissions beyond those permitted by the configured permission scheme via the {{update-team-member-roles}} REST API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-007345hCVE-2026-938473.5 LOW—
———Mattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.10 fail to validate reserved system post types on the scheduled post creation and publication paths which allows an authenticated channel member to publish messages rendering as trusted system events via the scheduled post endpoint.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-007325hCVE-2026-1161075.4 MED—
——0A vulnerability was detected in Datafeedr Product Sets Plugin up to 1.3.24 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is the function dfrps_ajax_delete_saved_search of the file functions/ajax.php of the component AJAX Handlers. The manipulation results in missing authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.3.25 can resolve this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.8hCVE-2026-115635——
——0Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user to read another tenant's record through a skipped upsert.
When Ash.bulk_create/4 or a single create runs as an upsert with return_skipped_upsert?: true and the upsert is skipped (for example because its upsert_condition does not hold), AshPostgres.DataLayer reads the existing row back by the upsert identity in do_bulk_create/3 and upsert/4. That lookup did not apply the resource's attribute multitenancy, so on a resource using strategy :attribute it could match and return the row of another tenant with the same identity values, exposing its fields to the caller.
This issue affects ash_postgres: from 2.6.22 before 2.15.2.6hCVE-2026-115627——
——0Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user to load destination records linked to a source record only through another tenant's join rows.
When a many_to_many relationship, or a through relationship, is loaded with a lateral join (for example with a per-record limit or sort), AshPostgres.DataLayer builds the query for the join resource, and for each resource along a through path, in lateral_join_query/3 and through_step_queries/4 without running that resource's read action, which is where attribute multitenancy is applied. When those resources use strategy :attribute multitenancy, rows belonging to other tenants were joined, so the load returned destination records that the caller's tenant is not related to.
This issue affects ash_postgres: from 0.38.0 before 2.15.2.6hCVE-2026-114214——
——0Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows a client to read destination records unrelated to the source record through a through relationship.
When a has_many relationship declared with through: was loaded for a single record with a limit of 1, or an unsorted has_one through relationship was loaded with a limit of 1, lateral_join?/4 in lib/ash/actions/read/relationships.ex chose the path that reads the destination without any filter linking it to the source. The load returned the first destination record by sort, or any other record with an offset. The read still runs the destination's policies but carries the relationship as accessing_from, so a client paging such a field (for example teachers(limit: 1, offset: n) through AshGraphql) can enumerate destination records that policies allow only when reached through that relationship.
This issue affects ash: from 3.24.0 before 3.37.1.6h