PULSE
FEED
ransomchaos reclama a mickeybody.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomaurora reclama a ARX Group SA · CH · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a whitearmor.cc · Technologyransomlockbit5 reclama a dorsiacademy.it · IT · Educationransomlockbit5 reclama a mlh.com.lb · LB · Professional Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a lidoway.com · LI · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a zelsior.es · ES · Not Foundransomemperador reclama a JS Constructor, INC · US · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a Whirlpool · US · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a JB Hunt · US · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Labaid Cancer Hospital And Super Speciality Center · BD · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Kale Balata A · TR · Agriculture and Food Productionransomqilin reclama a MaxiSeguridad · AR · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Aryza · AR · Technologyransomchaos reclama a mickeybody.com · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomaurora reclama a ARX Group SA · CH · Otherransomwhitearmor reclama a whitearmor.cc · Technologyransomlockbit5 reclama a dorsiacademy.it · IT · Educationransomlockbit5 reclama a mlh.com.lb · LB · Professional Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a lidoway.com · LI · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a zelsior.es · ES · Not Foundransomemperador reclama a JS Constructor, INC · US · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a Whirlpool · US · Manufacturingransomwhitearmor reclama a JB Hunt · US · Transportationransomqilin reclama a Labaid Cancer Hospital And Super Speciality Center · BD · Healthcareransomqilin reclama a Kale Balata A · TR · Agriculture and Food Productionransomqilin reclama a MaxiSeguridad · AR · Professional Servicesransomqilin reclama a Aryza · AR · Technology
CVE Watch402,410 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

16,726in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,754
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,668

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    3,545
  • High
    15,903
  • Medium
    14,814
  • Low
    1,453
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities8,641–8,680 · 16,726
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1089546.3 MED
17.9%
——5A vulnerability was found in k2-fsa sherpa-onnx up to 1.13.8. This issue affects the function OfflineTransducerGreedySearchDecoder::Decode of the file sherpa-onnx/csrc/offline-transducer-greedy-search-decoder.cc of the component Offline Transducer Greedy Search Decoder. The manipulation of the argument vocab_size results in buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. If only official model packs are used and they always keep metadata consistent with the joiner, the bug may not be reachable in normal supported usage. However, from a security and robustness standpoint, the code still contains the vulnerability because it trusts unvalidated model metadata and can be triggered by a malformed or tampered model pack.9d
CVE-2026-1089485.4 MED
18.3%
——5A vulnerability has been found in code-projects Online Reviewer System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /reviewer/system/system/admins/manage/users/btn_functions.php of the component User Profile Update Handler. The manipulation of the argument usertype_id leads to dynamically-determined object attributes. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.8d
CVE-2026-1089475.3 MED
18.9%
——6A flaw has been found in yoshitomo-matsubara torchdistill up to 1.1.5. This affects the function load_ckpt of the file torchdistill/common/main_util.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument src_ckpt can lead to deserialization. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project maintainer explains: "This is very similar to an internal report that GH auto-generated for the owner before, which I found tolerable for this project at that time. So I will close this as duplicate."10d
CVE-2026-1054584.3 MED
8.4%
——3GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 19.1 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user holding a specific granular permission to obtain a GitLab Duo Agent Platform token that bypasses governance controls, due to reliance on untrusted input in a security decision.9d
CVE-2026-1046614.3 MED
7.6%
——2GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 17.0 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user holding a custom role with compliance framework administration permissions to configure and execute a specially crafted compliance pipeline across group projects due to improper privilege assignment.9d
CVE-2026-1035492.7 LOW
13.5%
——4GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.6 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user with maintainer-role permissions to remove certain package registry metadata that package protection rules restrict to higher roles, due to improper authorization checks.9d
CVE-2026-1011686.2 MED
4.5%
——1GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.0 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user with access to GitLab Pages log data to obtain access tokens and other secrets, due to insertion of sensitive request data into log files and error tracking events.9d
CVE-2026-1007554.6 MED
0.5%
——0GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.2 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain deployment configurations, could have allowed an authenticated user to poison cached page content served to other users due to improper cache key construction.9d
CVE-2026-1001043.5 LOW
8.9%
——3GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.3 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to perform server-side request forgery and reach internal network resources due to a time-of-check to time-of-use race condition in URL validation during repository import operations.9d
CVE-2026-891244.3 MED
5.8%
——2Display Product Catalog Based on Customs Declaration application does not perform sufficient authorization checks within certain functionality, allowing an authenticated low-privileged user to access sensitive information beyond their intended authorization scope. This vulnerability has low impact on confidentiality of the data, with no impact on the integrity and availability of the application.8d
CVE-2026-891226.1 MED
3.6%
——1SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does not sufficiently validate input to a certain portal component. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by a victim, loads attacker-controlled content within the trusted application context. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to track user information and deface parts of the rendered page, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity with no impact on availability.8d
CVE-2026-891214.7 MED
0.5%
——0SAP S/4HANA does not perform sufficient instance-level authorization checks for certain modification operations on associated business object data. An attacker with low privileges and local access to the system could bypass authorization checks to modify data belonging to objects they are not authorized for. This results in a high impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability.8d
CVE-2026-891207.1 HIG
13.9%
——4A regression caused by an API change in SAP ABAP Platform reintroduces a previously fixed authorization weakness. The session manager can be opened in single transaction mode, including from FLP. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this to bypass restrictions via specially crafted requests, resulting in high impact on integrity and low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on availability.8d
CVE-2026-891185.3 MED
11.2%
——3SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal allows an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted resources and retrieve non-critical application information, which leads to Low impact on Confidentiality, but there is no impact on Integrity and Availability of the application.8d
CVE-2026-891176.1 MED
5.9%
——2SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal allows an unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious scripts into a URL parameter. The scripts are reflected in the server response and executed in a user's browser when the crafted URL is visited, leading to theft of session information, manipulation of portal content, or user redirection. This results in a low impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability.8d
CVE-2026-891165.9 MED
6.6%
——2The affected code used child_process.execSync with a shell string for generator installation and uninstallation. This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with the developer's privileges by manipulating the ApplicationWizard.installationLocation VS Code workspace configuration value. Because the value was passed directly to the shell without sanitisation, a malicious workspace repository could craft a settings.json that injects OS commands when a developer opens the project and triggers a generator installation.8d
CVE-2026-891138.8 HIG
27.1%
——8SAP Commerce Cloud does not sufficiently validate certain user-supplied input before it is incorporated into a database query. An authenticated user could send specially crafted requests to affected functionality to inject arbitrary SQL commands. Successful exploitation could allow the user to read, modify or delete sensitive data from the application's database, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.8d
CVE-2026-891126.5 MED
10.4%
——3The admin API endpoint used to retrieve CLA signature records does not consistently enforce the required authorization checks when the target organisation is specified using an organisation ID.An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially access CLA signature records containing contributor information belonging to an organisation they are not authorized to administer.8d
CVE-2026-8911110.0 CRI
18.8%
——6The SAP Cloud SDK for Python contains an OAuth2 SSRF vulnerability affecting multi-tenant BTP applications. An attacker who controls the tenant_subdomain parameter can redirect OAuth2 token requests to an attacker-controlled server, causing client credentials to be exfiltrated.8d
CVE-2026-891109.9 CRI
22.9%
——7SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer does not perform sufficient authorization checks in certain portal functionality. An attacker with low privileges could invoke internal operations on a preconfigured remote system. Depending on the remote connection configuration, this could lead to a full compromise of the remote system. This results in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.8d
CVE-2026-891089.1 CRI
21.6%
——6SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence does not sufficiently enforce authorization boundaries within certain administrative functionality. An attacker with MII administrator privileges could submit a specially crafted request to provision an account with elevated privileges on the underlying Java application server. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to gain administrative control over the underlying system, extending the impact beyond the vulnerable application. This results in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.8d
CVE-2026-891079.9 CRI
30.2%
——9SAP S/4HANA (Manage Substitution/Validation Rules) does not sufficiently validate input processed by rule definition functionality that utilizes a domain-specific scripting language. An authenticated attacker with specific business privileges could submit specially crafted input, which is interpreted as executable ABAP code by the rule processing logic. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute ABAP arbitrary code into the system, resulting in full compromise of the affected system and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system.8d
CVE-2026-891064.4 MED
2.1%
——1SAP UI5 does not perform sufficient input validation under certain configurations. An attacker with low privileges could submit specially crafted content that is later rendered in a victim's browser. This vulnerability has a low impact on confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability.8d
CVE-2026-891054.2 MED
3.3%
——1The HybridTokenAuthenticator component of the SAP/cloud-security-services-integration-library accepts tokens from unintended ambient IAS/XSUAA bindings, potentially allowing unauthorized access. This vulnerability allows an attacker to gain unauthorized access to the system by using tokens that should not be accepted, leading to a breach of security.8d
CVE-2026-876899.8 CRI
29.4%
——9The Metasploit Framework Web Service REST API (msf-ws) exposes the credential store through Msf::WebServices::CredentialServlet. Every mutating and read route in this servlet calls warden.authenticate! before processing a request, except the update_credential (PUT) and delete_credentials (DELETE) handlers for /api/v1/credentials, which omit the authentication call entirely. Because these handlers call directly into lib/msf/core/db_manager/cred.rb, which performs no authorization check of its own, any client able to reach the web service on its default 0.0.0.0:8080 listener can read, modify, or permanently delete every stored credential record — including passwords, hashes, and private keys stored for a shared team engagement — without presenting any authentication. All published versions of Metasploit Framework through 6.5.4 are affected. The issue is fixed in 6.5.5 by adding warden.authenticate! as the first statement in both handlers, matching the pattern used by every other route in the API.7d
CVE-2026-769765.4 MED
2.9%
——1Applications based on SAP GUI for HTML in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP do not sufficiently sanitize user-supplied content in certain functionality, allowing an authenticated attacker to send malicious content to another user. If the victim interacts with the affected content, malicious scripts could be executed in the victim's browser context. This vulnerability has a low impact on the confidentiality and integrity of the data and no impact on the availability of the application.8d
CVE-2026-769756.1 MED
5.9%
——2Due to a DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, an unauthenticated attacker could generate a malicious link and make it publicly accessible. If an authenticated user accesses this link, client-side code reads the attacker-controlled input and writes it into the DOM without proper sanitization, causing attacker-supplied script to execute in the victim�s browser context. This could allow the attacker to access or modify information within the victim�s browser scope, impacting confidentiality and integrity, while availability remains unaffected.8d
CVE-2026-769726.5 MED
4.8%
——1Due to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence, an attacker could store malicious content that is later rendered by the application. If an authenticated victim accesses a page that displays this stored content, the injected input is processed during web page generation, resulting in the execution of malicious content in the victim�s browser context. This could allow the attacker to access or modify information within the victim�s browser scope. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to access session information, modify rendered page content and disrupt the victim's use of the application, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.8d
CVE-2026-582497.5 HIG
24.0%
——7SAP NetWeaver and SAP Web Dispatcher do not properly validate certain fields in specially crafted requests handled by an internal protocol component. An unauthenticated attacker could send a malicious request that triggers a memory-handling error, causing the affected process to crash. Successful exploitation can therefore result in a high impact on the availability of the affected application. There is no impact on the confidentiality or integrity of the application.8d
CVE-2026-582423.5 LOW
4.5%
——1SAP Cloud Connector contains an improper authorization check, which could be exploited by a low-privileged attacker through specially crafted requests. Exploitation requires the attacker to be on an adjacent network. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to obtain limited information about internal systems, resulting in low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.8d
CVE-2026-1089455.3 MED
2.9%
——1A vulnerability was detected in iMoonLab yolov13 up to 73289949533efac82bb5f72ec19b746618656bd2. Affected by this issue is the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. Performing a manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in code injection. The attack must be initiated from a local position. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.8d
CVE-2026-1089444.8 MED
1.9%
——1A security vulnerability has been detected in repository RAE up to a4d18c4db766419cbe7cb8c02cd9f7ceb0ec9041. Affected by this vulnerability is the function get_obj_from_str of the file src/utils/model_utils.py of the component Config-Driven Model Instantiation. Such manipulation of the argument Target leads to code injection. The attack must be carried out locally. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.9d
CVE-2026-1089435.3 MED
3.0%
——1A weakness has been identified in ModelTC LightX2V up to 0.5.0. Affected is the function AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained of the file lightx2v/models/runners/cosmos3/cosmos3_runner.py of the component Tokenizer. This manipulation of the argument auto_map causes code injection. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.8d
CVE-2026-1089423.5 LOW
9.1%
——3A security flaw has been discovered in philz1337x clarity-upscaler up to cfbdb842c6c839c8e97741722b8cf9a4b7662d98. This impacts the function create_html_for_item of the file modules/ui_extra_networks.py of the component Extra Networks Card Rendering. The manipulation of the argument Description results in cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. All versions in the repository are affected, as the codebase is based on AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui v1.7.0 code. Upstream AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui (v1.8.0, released March 1, 2024) contains the fix. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.10d
CVE-2026-961199.9 CRI
43.3%
——13IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code on the system due to improper data sanitization by the HTTP Server Administration web application.9d
CVE-2026-938868.3 HIG
7.8%
——2IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary script code due to improper validation of user-supplied input.9d
CVE-2026-818585.4 MED
40.6%
——12IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service and obtain information due to an out-of-bounds read in the File Server.9d
CVE-2026-199385.9 MED
5.1%
——2The Bluetooth host's ATT transmit path releases a buffer it does not own when signing fails. chan_send() in subsys/bluetooth/host/att.c documents (and every other error exit implements) the contract that on failure the caller retains ownership of the net_buf; the BT_ATT_OP_SIGNED_WRITE_CMD branch instead called net_buf_unref(buf) when bt_smp_sign() returned an error and then returned that error to the caller. The callers act on the contract: process_queue() re-queues the buffer with k_queue_prepend(), bt_att_chan_send_rsp() puts it back on chan->tx_queue, bt_att_chan_req_send() restores it into the request, and att_req_retry() unreferences it — so the already-freed buffer was re-queued, later dereferenced, and eventually freed again. An ATT Signed Write Command is produced when an application calls bt_gatt_write_without_response_cb() with sign set on an unencrypted connection. bt_smp_sign() fails whenever no local CSRK exists for the peer (-ENOENT), and whether one exists is negotiated with the peer: smp_distribute_keys() stores a local CSRK only when the peer's pairing key-distribution field requests the signing key and bonding was agreed. A peer can therefore pair without accepting the CSRK, pair with No Bonding, remain unpaired, or keep the link unencrypted, and the victim's next signed write takes the failing path. Because struct net_buf's node field is simultaneously the linkage word for the ATT TX FIFO, for the deferred-destroy list used by the att_pool destroy callback att_tx_destroy(), and for the pool free list, the mishandled buffer corrupts these lists and can be re-issued by bt_att_create_pdu() to a new PDU while the ATT TX path still holds it. The same branch also saved the net_buf_simple_state only after signing, so a buffer restored after a bt_l2cap_send_pdu() failure kept its 12-octet signature; a subsequent retry re-signed it and appended a second signature with net_buf_add(buf, 12) to a buffer that bt_att_create_pdu() sized for exactly one, writing past the end of the pooled buffer in builds where the net_buf tailroom assertion is compiled out. Impact is host-side memory corruption in the Bluetooth stack: list corruption, a pooled ATT buffer with two owners (wrong PDU contents transmitted, or a double free when the queues are drained at disconnect), and a bounded out-of-bounds write on the retry path — typically observed as a crash or assertion failure. Exposure requires the deprecated CONFIG_BT_SIGNING to be enabled and an application that actually issues signed writes; in that configuration the triggering condition is under the remote peer's control.9d
CVE-2026-199375.7 MED
7.5%
——2The Bluetooth Mesh Access layer delayable-message machinery in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/delayable_msg.c manages a static pool of CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG_COUNT message contexts (default 4) threaded onto a free_ctx or busy_ctx list. release_delayable_msg_ctx() returned a context to free_ctx only when sys_slist_find_and_remove() found it on busy_ctx. The chunk-exhaustion error path in bt_mesh_delayable_msg_manage() releases a context that was already popped off free_ctx but not yet inserted on busy_ctx, so the context was appended to neither list and was permanently lost from the pool. Because bt_mesh_delayable_msg_init() runs only once from bt_mesh_init(), and node reset/suspend only drain busy_ctx, the loss survives unprovision, re-provision and suspend/resume — it is cleared only by a reboot. The error path is reached when the chunk pool (CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG_CHUNK_COUNT, default 40 chunks) is short of the chunks a new delayed message needs and the oldest pending message cannot be flushed because bt_mesh_access_send() returns -EBUSY or -ENOBUFS (all segmented-TX contexts busy, or advertising/segment buffers exhausted). A peer that is provisioned into the mesh network — holding a valid NetKey plus an AppKey or DevKey bound to a server model — can drive both conditions by flooding the victim with requests that elicit segmented responses while withholding the Segment Acknowledgment, which keeps the transmit contexts occupied while queued responses hold the chunk pool. Each further request that arrives in that window leaks one context. Once the pool is drained, bt_mesh_delayable_msg_manage() returns -ENOMEM for every subsequent send and bt_mesh_model_send() propagates that error with no fallback to an immediate transmit. Since CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG and CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG_CTX_ENABLED are both enabled by default, ctx->rnd_delay is set for every received access message, so all replies from Configuration Server, Health Server and application server models are silently dropped. The node keeps receiving and processing traffic but never answers, a persistent denial of service until the device is restarted. There is no memory corruption, information disclosure or integrity impact; releases before the fix compute the chunk count from the transmit buffer capacity rather than its payload length, making chunk-pool starvation — and therefore the leak — considerably easier to provoke.9d
CVE-2026-199364.8 MED
3.4%
——1The Bluetooth Mesh Access-layer delayable message queue in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/delayable_msg.c shares three intrusive lists (busy_ctx, free_ctx, free_chunks) and one k_work_delayable between two cooperative threads with no synchronization: bt_mesh_delayable_msg_manage() runs on the Bluetooth host RX thread, while delayable_msg_handler() runs on the system workqueue. Both block while the lists are in an intermediate state — the enqueuer in bt_rand(), both in bt_mesh_access_send() — which lets the other context observe torn state. delayable_msg_handler() used the result of sys_slist_get() on busy_ctx without a NULL check, and allocate_delayable_msg_ctx() tested sys_slist_is_empty() and then assumed a separate sys_slist_get() would succeed. Because CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG and CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG_CTX_ENABLED default to y, every model response to a received mesh message is parked on this queue, so the enqueuer runs as a direct consequence of inbound traffic. A peer that can get access-layer messages accepted by a model (it must hold the NetKey and a bound AppKey, so a legitimate or compromised network member) controls the arrival rate, the size of the elicited responses and the destination address, and thereby controls occupancy of the 4-entry context pool and the 40-entry chunk pool. Exhausting the chunk pool forces bt_mesh_delayable_msg_manage() down the purge path, which sends and releases the only queued message and leaves busy_ctx empty while the delayable work item is still armed; if the enqueuer then yields, the handler runs against the empty list. The result is a read-modify-write through a NULL-based pointer (pending_msg->fired_time += 10) at a fixed low address on the system workqueue thread. On typical targets that faults, aborting the system workqueue thread — which stops all workqueue-driven functionality, including the mesh timing machinery — or resetting the node, so the impact is loss of availability of the affected node. The write value and address are fixed and no attacker-controlled length or index is involved, so this is not exploitable for memory corruption or code execution. The same unsynchronized window also allowed one message context to be selected and released by two contexts at once, producing duplicated transmissions, duplicated send-completion callbacks and crossed chunk ownership. The fix serializes every list mutation with a k_spinlock that is never held across a blocking call, makes push_msg_from_delayable_msgs() detach the queue head atomically so a message being sent is on no list, removes the unchecked sys_slist_get() from delayable_msg_handler(), and drops any message that reaches the front of the queue while the stack is suspended or reset.9d