Vulnerabilities exploitable today
4,330in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,748
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,665
Distribution · last window
- Critical3,403
- High15,277
- Medium14,292
- Low1,366
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2022-30781—99.8%
——30——CVE-2017-17411—99.8%
——30——CVE-2003-0718—99.8%
——30——CVE-2022-27593—99.8%
KEVR80QNAP Photo Station Externally Controlled Reference Vulnerability—CVE-2025-32429—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-26256—99.8%
——30——CVE-2014-0221—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-36104—99.8%
——30——CVE-2018-7357—99.8%
——30——CVE-2009-0658—99.8%
——30——CVE-2021-37119.8 CRI99.8%
——30In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).12dCVE-2024-30255—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-8605—99.8%
——30——CVE-2024-58136—99.8%
KEV—80Yiiframework Yii Improper Protection of Alternate Path Vulnerability—CVE-2009-1429—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-0151—99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Windows Authenticode Signature Verification Remote Code Execution Vulnerability—CVE-2020-27131—99.8%
——30——CVE-2016-6415—99.8%
KEV—80Cisco IOS, IOS XR, and IOS XE IKEv1 Information Disclosure Vulnerability—CVE-2018-5999—99.8%
——30——CVE-2023-463599.8 CRI99.8%
——30An OS command injection vulnerability in Hardy Barth cPH2 eCharge Ladestation v1.87.0 and earlier, may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system via a specifically crafted arguments passed to the connectivity check feature.104dCVE-2012-1427—99.8%
——30——CVE-2012-1428—99.8%
——30——CVE-2015-0240—99.8%
——30——CVE-2016-6366—99.8%
KEV—80Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) SNMP Buffer Overflow Vulnerability—CVE-2024-43425—99.8%
——30——CVE-2013-3893—99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Internet Explorer Resource Management Errors Vulnerability—CVE-2026-713629.1 CRI99.8%
KEV—80Adobe Commerce and Magento Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability 26dCVE-2003-0545—99.8%
——30——CVE-2019-11409—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-17496—99.8%
KEV—80vBulletin PHP Module Remote Code Execution Vulnerability—CVE-2013-2028—99.8%
——30——CVE-2007-5659—99.8%
KEV—80Adobe Acrobat and Reader Buffer Overflow Vulnerability—CVE-2020-15867—99.8%
——30——CVE-2019-9515—99.8%
——30——CVE-2017-11610—99.8%
——30——CVE-2016-9079—99.8%
KEV—80Mozilla Firefox, Firefox ESR, and Thunderbird Use-After-Free Vulnerability—CVE-2018-7584—99.8%
——30——CVE-2020-10924—99.8%
——30——CVE-2014-6324—99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) Privilege Escalation Vulnerability—CVE-2020-10546—99.8%
——30——