Vulnerabilities exploitable today
9,869in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,644
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,579
Distribution · last window
- Critical1,283
- High4,187
- Medium3,505
- Low268
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-56748.8 HIG—
——0A flaw was found in PipeWire, a multimedia server. This vulnerability allows an attacker to escape sandboxed applications, such as Flatpak, by exploiting PipeWire's PulseAudio compatibility layer. An attacker with minimal permissions within a sandboxed environment can load a malicious library, leading to arbitrary code execution outside the sandbox and potential compromise of the user's system.6hCVE-2026-564565.3 MED—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal File Path Disclosure vulnerability. The application dashboard inadvertently leaks sensitive information regarding its internal file structure and directory paths through unhandled error messages, system logs, or debugging output, which could allow a remote attacker to map the underlying server environment and identify targets for further exploitation.6hCVE-2026-564555.3 MED—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS). The application fails to properly validate input sizes, allowing an attacker to pass an excessive amount of information into a memory container, which can cause the system to crash or become unresponsive. To mitigate this flaw, comprehensive input length checks must be implemented and enforced on both the client and server sides.6hCVE-2026-564545.9 MED—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Deprecated Protocol vulnerability due to the use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1. These legacy protocols contain numerous cryptographic design flaws that expose data to interception and decryption. To remediate this risk, the application must disable all support for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, and exclusively enable support for secure protocols, specifically TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.6hCVE-2026-564535.5 MED—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Account Takeover via Response Manipulation vulnerability. A remote attacker can intercept and alter the contents of the server's HTTP responses before they reach the client application, allowing them to manipulate the authentication or authorization logic to bypass controls and gain unauthorized access to targeted user accounts.6hCVE-2026-351453.1 LOW—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing HTTP Strict-Transport-Security Header vulnerability. The application fails to implement the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) policy within its responses, which could allow a remote attacker to downgrade the communication channel to an unencrypted connection (HTTP) and conduct man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. To remediate this, the application must include the "Strict-Transport-Security" header in all web application responses.6hCVE-2026-351433.0 LOW—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing SameSite Attribute vulnerability. The application fails to set the "SameSite" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks if additional mitigations, such as Anti-CSRF tokens, are not implemented.6hCVE-2026-351422.6 LOW—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Internal IP Address Disclosure vulnerability. The application includes internal IP address details within its generated server responses, which could allow a remote attacker to gather sensitive network topology information and use it to map the internal infrastructure for further targeted attacks.6hCVE-2026-351412.6 LOW—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Login Replay Attack vulnerability. The application allows a remote attacker to intercept, delay, or fraudulently retransmit valid authentication data to achieve unauthorized access. To mitigate this risk, the application must implement a mechanism to include timestamps with every message, ensuring that messages exceeding a specific age threshold are automatically rejected by the recipient system.6hCVE-2026-351403.0 LOW—
——0HCL DFXAnalytics is affected by a Missing Secure Attribute in Encrypted Session (SSL) Cookie vulnerability. The application fails to set the "secure" attribute on session cookies generated during authentication, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and capture sensitive cookies, session tokens, or credentials sent in cleartext over unencrypted channels.6hCVE-2026-94945.5 MED—
——0An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Canonical ubuntu-pro-client (formerly ubuntu-advantage-tools). The client validates Ubuntu Pro APT credentials by executing /usr/lib/apt/apt-helper using the download-file command. During this process, the secret bearer token is embedded directly in
the cleartext URL component passed via the command-line arguments (argv), resulting in a URL format such as https://bearer:<token>@esm.ubuntu.com/.../. On systems utilizing a default-mounted /proc file system where process-hiding mitigations (such as hidepid) are disabled, an unprivileged local attacker can
monitor system processes and read the sensitive bearer token directly from /proc/cmdline while the helper process is actively running. This leaked token can subsequently be used to gain unauthorized access to the victim's Ubuntu Pro or Expanded Security Maintenance (ESM) repositories.7hCVE-2026-633068.6 HIG—
——0stoatchat before 0.13.5 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy and /embed endpoints that accept arbitrary URLs without DNS resolution filtering or private IP range validation. Attackers can enumerate internal services, fingerprint applications, and reach instance metadata endpoints by supplying malicious URLs or leveraging redirect chains to access internal infrastructure.9hCVE-2026-633058.1 HIG—
——0AVideo through 29.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the ffmpeg.json.php endpoint where notifyCode and callback parameters are concatenated into a shell command without escaping. Attackers who can craft a valid encrypted payload can inject arbitrary shell metacharacters into these fields to execute OS commands as the web-server user.9hCVE-2026-633048.1 HIG—
——0AVideo through 29.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in plugin/API/standAlone/functions.php where the listFFmpegProcesses() function interpolates unsanitized keyword parameters inside single quotes without escaping. Attackers who can craft a valid encrypted codeToExec payload can break out of the single-quoted grep context and execute arbitrary OS commands as the web-server user.9hCVE-2026-123915.0 MED—
——0An insecure symlink following vulnerability exists in Canonical ubuntu-pro-client (formerly ubuntu-advantage-tools) within the pro collect-logs command framework. The utility creates or utilizes predictable temporary file paths or user-accessible log directories when gathering diagnostic information without verifying the file type or ownership. An unprivileged local attacker can exploit this behavior by creating a symbolic link (symlink) at a predictable destination path pointing to an arbitrary, root-readable file (such as /etc/shadow or private files within /root). When a root administrator or operator subsequently executes the pro collect-logs command, the tool follows the user-controlled symlink, reads the target file, and compresses its contents into the resulting diagnostic support archive. Because the output archive remains readable by the unprivileged user, the attacker can extract and read the sensitive root-owned files, leading to a complete information disclosure of system secrets.9hCVE-2026-113869.0 CRI—
——0An input validation and injection vulnerability exists in Canonical ubuntu-pro-client (formerly ubuntu-advantage-tools). The client constructs APT source files (such as /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-.list or their DEB822 equivalents) using data received directly from the contract server response via the directives.suites[] and directives.aptURL fields. Because the client utilizes Python's str.format() to write these files without performing escaping, validation, or newline character filtering, a malicious or tampered contract response containing embedded newline (\n) characters can successfully inject arbitrary, attacker-controlled deb configuration lines into root-owned APT sources. When combined with the unvalidated additionalPackages[] field—which is passed positionally into a root-executed apt-get install command—an attacker capable of spoofing or manipulating the contract response (e.g., via a compromised internal infrastructure, an intercepted connection utilizing a trusted CA, or local logical bugs) can force the client to fetch and install malicious packages. This ultimately leads to arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the affected system. This component is preinstalled on supported Ubuntu Server releases and auto-attaches by default on cloud provider Ubuntu Pro images.9hCVE-2025-71388——
——0stoatchat (delta/Revolt) versions from 20241213-1 before 20250210-1 allow users with only ViewChannel (read) permission on a channel to fetch that channel's webhooks, including their tokens, because the webhook fetch endpoint checked for ViewChannel instead of ManageWebhooks. Using a retrieved token, an attacker can send arbitrary messages to the channel, bypassing channel permissions and impersonating a bot or webhook. Fixed in 20250210-1 (0.8.2).7hCVE-2025-71377——
——0stoatchat (delta) versions before 20250210-1 (0.8.2) contain a logic error in the query messages route. When fetching messages 'nearby' another message, the database query can be given a message limit of zero, which the database interprets as 'no limit'. A remote unauthenticated attacker can craft nearby message fetch requests to download an entire channel's message history in a single expensive request, and can send many such requests in parallel, resulting in denial of service through resource exhaustion.9hCVE-2024-583606.5 MED—
——0stoatchat versions before 0.7.8 fail to enforce account creation restrictions including invite-only mode, email verification, captcha, and shield verification. Attackers can create unlimited accounts with unverified email addresses, increasing denial-of-service risk and compromising service integrity.9hCVE-2026-59249——
——0Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.
The Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 function in lib/mint/http1.ex parses the chunk-size line of a Transfer-Encoding: chunked response with Integer.parse(data, 16). RFC 7230 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG and forbids any sign prefix, but Integer.parse/2 accepts an optional leading + or -. A chunk-size line of +5 is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of +0 and -0 are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.
An RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.
This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.9hCVE-2026-351498.2 HIG—
——0HCL DFXServer is affected by an Authentication Bypass vulnerability via server response manipulation. An unauthorized user without valid credentials can exploit this flaw by intercepting and altering the server's authentication responses, allowing them to gain unauthorized access to the application without verification.9hCVE-2026-351486.3 MED—
——0HCL DFXServer is affected by a Missing Access Control vulnerability. This vulnerability states that certain endpoints are accessible without any form of authentication in another browser. This allows any network user to invoke these APIs and interact with the application without verification of their identity or authorization level.9hCVE-2026-351478.2 HIG—
——0HCL DFXServer is affected by a Broken Authentication vulnerability via direct API access. The application fails to verify the user's authentication status when accessing specific API endpoints, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to interact with the APIs and perform unauthorized actions without valid credentials.9hCVE-2026-351466.3 MED—
——0HCL DFXServer is affected by an Unencrypted Communication vulnerability. The application permits users to establish connections over unencrypted channels via the HTTP protocol, which could allow a remote attacker to intercept network traffic and expose sensitive data transmitted between the user and the application.9hCVE-2023-499009.8 CRI—
——0An unauthenticated remote attacker is able to perform remote code execution due to incorrectly sanitized user input in the SetParameter command.7hCVE-2023-498999.8 CRI—
——0An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute any command on the affected device due to not correctly verifying the origin of a communication channel.9hCVE-2026-8055——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-48866. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2026-48866. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-48866 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.1dCVE-2026-62287——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61873. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61873. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61873 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62248——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61438. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61438. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61438 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62180——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61440. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61440. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61440 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62178——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61427. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61427. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61427 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62177——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-60085. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-60085. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-60085 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62174——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61435. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61435. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61435 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62173——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61433. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61433. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61433 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62172——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61436. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61436. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61436 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62169——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61430. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61430. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61430 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62168——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61443. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61443. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61443 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62165——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61446. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61446. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61446 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-62164——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-60087. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-60087. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-60087 instead of this candidate.1dCVE-2026-61841——
——0Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-61449. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-61449. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-61449 instead of this candidate.1d