PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a SEPIVER · MX · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a istanbultrading.com · TR · Retail & E-Commerceransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M... C... · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a United Restaurant Supply · US · Hospitalityransombravox reclama a AMSAM · FR · Not Foundransombravox reclama a Barrow & Grimm · US · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M...r · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Kirkland & Ellis LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Bethany Press International · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Medienwerkstatt · DE · Educationransomakira reclama a Annapath · Not Foundransomrhysida reclama a DR.SCHNELL GmbH & Co. KGaA · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Airtificial · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Bathurst RSL · AU · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a SEPIVER · MX · Not Foundransomlockbit5 reclama a istanbultrading.com · TR · Retail & E-Commerceransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M... C... · Not Foundransomqilin reclama a United Restaurant Supply · US · Hospitalityransombravox reclama a AMSAM · FR · Not Foundransombravox reclama a Barrow & Grimm · US · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a M...r · Not Foundransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Kirkland & Ellis LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomakira reclama a Bethany Press International · Retail & E-Commerceransomakira reclama a Medienwerkstatt · DE · Educationransomakira reclama a Annapath · Not Foundransomrhysida reclama a DR.SCHNELL GmbH & Co. KGaA · DE · Manufacturingransomqilin reclama a Airtificial · Technologyransomqilin reclama a Bathurst RSL · AU · Hospitality
CVE Watch401,738 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

16,403in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,754
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,667

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    3,399
  • High
    15,528
  • Medium
    14,782
  • Low
    1,421
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities10,681–10,720 · 16,403
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1021677.5 HIG
13.3%
——4On affected Arista Wi-Fi access points, a memory corruption vulnerability exists in access point's wired uplink network endpoints. An unauthenticated attacker can crash the sensor service or potentially achieve remote code execution. Exploitation requires the attacker to be on the same network segment as the access point's wired uplink.17d
CVE-2026-1021657.5 HIG
14.9%
——4On affected Arista Wi-Fi access points, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the capture service can send a crafted packet to cause the service to crash or potentially achieve remote code execution. This exploit requires an uncommonly used non-default streaming mode.17d
CVE-2026-1021643.1 LOW
8.3%
——2On affected Arista access points configured with VXLAN tunnelling and L2-proxy (a specific configuration unique to the VESPA use-case), a wireless client associated to the tunnelled SSID can send a crafted packet, causing the access point to reveal memory contents in network traffic. No write primitive or remote code execution is possible.17d
CVE-2026-1021638.8 HIG
22.5%
——7On affected Arista access points with Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS) active, an unauthenticated attacker within radio frequency (RF) proximity can send a crafted frame to crash the sensor service, disabling WIPS monitoring on the access point, or potentially achieve remote code execution. No wireless association or authentication is required.17d
CVE-2026-1021628.8 HIG
14.9%
——4On affected Arista Wi-Fi access points with captive portal, or application firewall enabled on at least one SSID, a vulnerability in the wireless gateway service could allow an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker to send a crafted packet that triggers a stack overflow, resulting in a denial-of-service condition or potentially execute arbitrary code on the device. The wireless gateway service is automatically restarted after a crash, allowing repeated exploitation attempts.17d
CVE-2026-1021618.8 HIG
11.4%
——3An unauthenticated attacker located on an adjacent private network (or any attacker routed through a reverse proxy/load balancer that forwards client headers) can forge their source IP address and gain administrative session privileges on the CV-CUE backend.17d
CVE-2026-1021607.2 HIG
71.4%
——21An operating system (OS) command injection vulnerability in CloudVision CUE backup management may allow an authenticated Super User to submit a crafted backup request and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the affected service.17d
CVE-2026-1021599.8 CRI
29.0%
——9An access-control flaw in the CV-CUE backend may allow an unauthenticated network attacker to access functionality intended only for internal services. Successful exploitation may expose sensitive location information or disrupt affected services.17d
CVE-2026-1021586.5 MED
19.9%
——6Improper validation of selected CloudVision CUE application programming interface (API) request parameters may allow an authenticated network user to perform SQL injection against the backend impacting its availability.17d
CVE-2026-1021575.9 MED
15.3%
——5An insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in a CloudVision CUE file-serving interface may allow an authenticated network user, under specific attack conditions, to access another user's transient data.17d
CVE-2026-1021566.8 MED
20.3%
——6Improper neutralization of Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) authentication input may allow an unauthenticated network attacker, under high-complexity conditions, to inject queries against the configured directory service.17d
CVE-2026-1021558.5 HIG
25.0%
——8An XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in the WiFi-server Spectralight application allows any authenticated user to send malicious requests, leading to arbitrary local file disclosure and partial denial of service.17d
CVE-2026-1011588.4 HIG
19.7%
——6A missing input validation vulnerability in the Fileserver upload API allows an authenticated attacker with file upload privileges to execute stored cross-site scripting (XSS). Successful exploitation could enable the attacker to hijack another CloudVision user's web session, potentially granting full access to their account and administrative permissions.17d
CVE-2026-1011578.7 HIG
11.6%
——3A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability may allow an unauthenticated attacker with adjacent-network access to inject malicious content that executes when an authenticated user views affected content. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to compromise the victim's authenticated browser session, access sensitive data, modify system state, or disrupt affected services.17d
CVE-2026-1011568.4 HIG
20.5%
——6A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability may allow an authenticated, high-privilege administrator to store malicious content in a configuration. The content may execute in another authenticated user's browser when that user views or compares the affected configuration. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to act through the victim's authenticated browser session to access sensitive data, modify configurations, or disrupt managed wireless services.17d
CVE-2026-1011559.1 CRI
46.1%
——14An authenticated remote attacker with specific permissions can read or write files on the platform filesystem beyond the intended scope through specially crafted requests and/or crafted file uploads to the Software Management Studio Software Repository.17d
CVE-2026-1011547.2 HIG
46.1%
——14An authenticated remote attacker with specific permissions can read or write files on the platform filesystem beyond the intended scope through specially crafted requests and/or crafted file uploads to the Network Provisioning Image Repository.16d
CVE-2026-1011538.0 HIG
25.2%
——8On affected versions of CloudVision Portal (on-premises) or CloudVision Sensor, a path traversal vulnerability exists. An authenticated user with sufficient high privileges could exploit this to extract unintended data from the Sensor.17d
CVE-2026-1011528.0 HIG
30.6%
——9Insufficient validation in the Single Sign-On (SSO) login flow could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to craft a URL that, when clicked by a user, causes the identity provider (IdP) to deliver authentication material to an attacker-controlled URL instead of to CloudVision.17d
CVE-2026-1011514.3 MED
22.4%
——7Insufficient validation of request in login flow could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to craft a URL that, when clicked by a user, redirects the user's browser to an arbitrary external site upon completion of the authentication process.17d
CVE-2026-1011504.1 MED
11.6%
——3Insufficient validation of OIDC bearer token configuration could allow a user with specific high privileges to direct requests to arbitrary destinations.17d
CVE-2026-1011494.1 MED
11.6%
——3Insufficient validation of OIDC SSO provider configuration could allow a user with specific high privileges to direct requests to arbitrary destinations.17d
CVE-2026-1010294.3 MED
5.4%
——2Gitea's repository migration and pull mirror egress checks could be bypassed with a hostname that returns multiple DNS answers, because the address that was validated was not necessarily the address Git later connected to. A low-privileged user who can create migrations or mirrors could direct the server to internal services, reading from and writing to reachable internal Git or HTTP endpoints. Content from internal responses could additionally be disclosed through migration and mirror error messages.8d
CVE-2026-1010277.7 HIG
6.0%
——2When `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` was configured, a hostname matching the allow list was accepted without checking its resolved address against the local-network restrictions. A user who can start repository migrations and control the DNS of an allowed hostname could make it resolve to loopback or private addresses and bypass `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`, reaching internal services from the Gitea server. Instances without `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configured are not affected by this specific bypass.8d
CVE-2026-92266.8 MED
10.6%
——3Authentication bypass in the Azure AD external login flow in Devolutions Server 2026.3.7.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to take over a user's account via replay of a captured login-session token exposed in a redirect URL.16d
CVE-2026-968908.8 HIG
40.2%
——12A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed a repository contributor to cause the appliance to issue requests to attacker-controlled internal hosts, which could be chained to achieve remote code execution on the appliance. The secret scanning validator for GCP service account credentials trusted the token endpoint embedded in a committed credential and issued a request to it without restricting the destination. Exploitation required an authenticated user with permission to push to a repository on an instance with GitHub Advanced Security and secret scanning validity checks enabled, a non-default configuration. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server 3.20, 3.21, and 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.20.9, 3.21.7, and 3.22.2. This vulnerability was reported through the GitHub Bug Bounty program.14d
CVE-2026-863628.2 HIG
2.2%
——1Dell System Update, versions prior to 2.3.0.0, contains an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.9d
CVE-2026-863618.2 HIG
3.0%
——1Dell System Update, versions prior to 2.3.0.0, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.9d
CVE-2026-863609.6 CRI
49.6%
——15Dell System Update, versions prior to 2.3.0.0, contains an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Filesystem access for attacker. This vulnerability is considered critical because it can be leveraged by an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. Successful exploitation may allow complete compromise of the vulnerable application and underlying operating system. Dell recommends customers upgrade at the earliest opportunity.10d
CVE-2026-835507.1 HIG
10.4%
——3A flaw was found in postgres-exporter. Due to the blank import of `net/http/pprof`, debug endpoints are exposed on the unauthenticated metrics listener. A remote attacker within the cluster network can access these endpoints. This allows for information disclosure, potentially revealing process arguments, full goroutine stacks, and sensitive data like database connection strings or passwords from heap dumps. Additionally, repeated CPU profiling through these endpoints can lead to a denial of service.16d
CVE-2026-821627.4 HIG
21.9%
——7Dell Command | Configure (DCC), versions prior to 5.2.3.35, contain an Improper Handling of Mixed Encoding vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges.10d
CVE-2026-711687.3 HIG
11.5%
——3Dell System Update, versions prior to 2.3.0.0, contains an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution.10d
CVE-2026-704145.5 MED
0.8%
——0Dell Command | Configure (DCC), versions prior to 5.2.3.35, contain a Plaintext Storage of Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information Disclosure.10d
CVE-2026-636977.6 HIG
21.2%
——6Dell System Update, versions prior to 2.3.0.0, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution.10d
CVE-2026-569526.7 MED
0.1%
——0In platform_msg_handler_init of default_msg_handlers.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.16d
CVE-2026-569366.8 MED
1.0%
——0In wacom_hid_set_device_mode of wacom_sys.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.17d
CVE-2026-569067.0 HIG
0.0%
——0In ep_free of eventpoll.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.16d
CVE-2026-553309.8 CRI
21.4%
——6In BluetoothCccHandlerCallbackImpl of bluetooth_ccc.cc, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.16d
CVE-2026-553074.4 MED
0.1%
——0In kdn_set_sysregs_prot of hwcrypto-kdn.c, there is a possible information disclosure due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.17d
CVE-2026-106513—
50.0%
——15MISP exposes critical infrastructure settings—specifically the Redis host addresses used by the core application, the ZeroMQ plugin, and the SimpleBackgroundJobs plugin—through its web UI and API to site-admin users. The background job workers trust raw Redis job payloads without additional validation. An attacker who obtains a hijacked site-admin session (for example, through a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability) can modify the Redis host settings to point at an attacker-controlled Redis server and then restart the workers. Once the workers connect to the attacker's Redis instance, the attacker can inject malicious job payloads that the workers execute, achieving arbitrary command execution as the worker account. Additionally, the download_attachments_on_load setting, which controls inline attachment rendering, was modifiable through the same interface, allowing a hijacked session to re-enable a feature that could facilitate further client-side attacks. The vulnerability requires site-admin privileges and a prior session-compromise mechanism; it does not require unauthenticated access. The impact is remote code execution in the context of the MISP worker process and potential data exfiltration through the attacker-controlled Redis connection.16d