CVE Watch367,002 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

11,896in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,685

New KEV · 24H0

Exploit Today ≥ 701,629

Distribution · last window

Critical
2,262
High
9,262
Medium
5,225
Low
501

Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities11,521–11,560 · 11,896

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.

CVE-2026-690977.0 HIG

8.4%

——3GitPython before 3.1.53 fails to properly escape section names in git config files, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary configuration directives through malicious submodule names. Attackers can inject core.sshCommand or other dangerous config keys into the victim's .git/config via create_submodule or clone_from operations, achieving remote code execution when git performs ssh operations.26d CVE-2026-690968.8 HIG

75.2%

——23OpenWrt luci-app-dockerman (LuCI master and openwrt-25.12 snapshots containing the ucode docker_rpc.uc RPC backend after the JS/ucode conversion) contains an OS command injection vulnerability. The package's read ACL grants broad ubus access to docker.* / docker.container.*, which exposes the docker.container.ttyd_start method even though it performs mutating operations. The run_ttyd handler builds a shell command from the request-controlled id, cmd, and uid fields and passes it to system() without quoting or argv-style execution in the rpcd root context. An authenticated attacker holding only the luci-app-dockerman read ACL can inject shell metacharacters (e.g., in id) to execute arbitrary commands as root via an HTTP POST to /ubus. openwrt-24.10 and openwrt-23.05 do not contain this backend and are not affected; no patched version was known as of the advisory.26d CVE-2026-690957.5 HIG

47.2%

——14OpenWrt luci-app-bmx7 before commit 5890760a454dad2cb00389dba2cdc5e779e0ffdd contains a path traversal vulnerability in the bmx7-info CGI script that allows unauthenticated attackers to read files outside the configured runtimeDir. Attackers can supply directory traversal sequences in the query string to escape the intended directory and read sensitive files accessible to the CGI process.27d CVE-2026-690944.3 MED

5.3%

——2Admidio before 5.0.11 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the save_temporary mode of mylist_function.php that allows authenticated users to hijack list configurations. Attackers can enumerate global list UUIDs and overwrite admin-curated global lists or other users' private lists by supplying a list_uuid parameter, transferring ownership and demoting global lists to personal configurations.27d CVE-2026-690934.6 MED

1.4%

——0Admidio before 5.0.11 does not validate the adm_csrf_token in modules/category-report/preferences.php, which performs persistent Category Report configuration changes based on GET parameters (delete and copy). An attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into visiting a crafted URL to delete or duplicate Category Report configurations, affecting the integrity and availability of that module's configuration.27d CVE-2026-690926.5 MED

13.0%

——4Admidio versions before 5.0.11 contain a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the SSO/SAML endpoint that echoes unencoded exception messages to the HTTP response. Unauthenticated attackers can inject arbitrary JavaScript through SAML Issuer elements or LightSaml library parameters to execute code in users' browsers and hijack sessions.27d CVE-2026-690917.5 HIG

28.5%

——9Admidio before 5.0.11 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the forum module when configured in login-only mode. The access control logic in modules/forum.php fails to validate the login-only configuration state, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read forum topics and posts by directly accessing the module with read-only parameters.27d CVE-2026-690904.9 MED

9.9%

——3Admidio before 5.0.11 fails to validate target organization membership in role handlers, allowing authenticated role administrators to delete, activate, deactivate, or edit roles belonging to other organizations. Attackers can supply a role UUID from another organization to groups_roles.php handlers to modify that organization's roles without authorization.27d CVE-2026-690897.5 HIG

30.2%

——9Grav CMS 2.0.10 contains a path traversal vulnerability in ImageMedium::watermark(), which passes its unsanitized $image argument to RocketTheme\Toolbox\ResourceLocator\UniformResourceLocator::findResource(). Because the file:// scheme branch only lexically collapses '..' segments without a realpath/containment check, an editor authoring Markdown image syntax with traversal sequences can cause arbitrary image files outside Grav's media sandbox to be composited into a carrier image, which is then cached and served from a public, unauthenticated URL — disclosing those files to anonymous visitors.27d CVE-2026-690888.1 HIG

14.1%

——4Grav CMS versions 2.0.7 through 2.0.10 fail to validate fully-qualified static method calls (Class::method) in blueprint dynamic-field directives because Blueprint::isSafeDynamicCall() only applies its dangerous-callable denylist to strings that do not contain '::'. An account with only page-editing rights (admin.pages, not super-admin or admin.pages_twig) can plant a directive in a page's form-field frontmatter that invokes an arbitrary public static PHP method with attacker-controlled arguments. Using built-in gadget methods this allows reading of any server-readable file (disclosed to anonymous visitors of the crafted page) and arbitrary creation/copying of files and directories under the web-server account. Fixed in 2.0.11.27d CVE-2026-690876.5 MED

11.5%

——3The Grav form plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-form) before 9.1.13 contains an open redirect vulnerability. Since v9.1.11, the redirect process action evaluates user-supplied form data inside Twig expressions, and Grav::redirect() accepts external URLs without origin validation. When a form blueprint defines a redirect target such as redirect: "{{ form.value('next') }}" using an attacker-controllable field, an unauthenticated form submitter can supply a value like https://evil.com to cause a 302 redirect to an arbitrary external site, enabling phishing.27d CVE-2026-690867.7 HIG

27.8%

——8SiYuan versions before v3.7.3 fail to validate the avID parameter on all code branches in attribute-view read endpoints, allowing attackers to construct traversal paths that escape the storage directory. Authenticated users with RoleReader permissions or anonymous clients when publish authentication is disabled can read JSON files outside the attribute-view directory to disclose cross-scope database content.4d CVE-2026-6908510.0 CRI

16.2%

——5SiYuan before v3.7.3 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the /api/filetree/searchDocs endpoint, where the caller-supplied keyword parameter is concatenated directly into SQL statements with no escaping or parameter binding. The endpoint is reachable by a publish RoleReader token, or unauthenticated when publish mode is enabled with Publish.Auth.Enable set to false. Because the statement executes on a read-write SQLite handle via a driver that supports stacked (semicolon-separated) statements, an attacker can read and modify database content across all cleartext (non-encrypted) notebooks on the instance.4d CVE-2026-6908410.0 CRI

63.4%

——19SiYuan versions <= v3.7.2 expose the /api/search/searchEmbedBlock endpoint, which passes a client-supplied SQL statement verbatim to the main read-write siyuan.db handle with no single-statement, read-only, or admin restrictions. The endpoint is gated only by CheckAuth, making it reachable by the publish RoleReader token and by anonymous users when publish authentication is disabled. Because the underlying driver executes stacked statements, an attacker can read and modify content across all opened cleartext notebooks (encrypted per-box notebooks are excluded). Fixed in v3.7.3.4d CVE-2026-6908310.0 CRI

27.8%

——8SiYuan versions before v3.7.3 contain SQL injection vulnerabilities in the fullTextSearchAssetContent endpoint reachable by unauthenticated users and publish RoleReader tokens. Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL on the read-write asset-content database via unescaped method parameters and REGEXP clauses to read, modify, or delete cross-notebook data.4d CVE-2026-685878.6 HIG

15.6%

——5SiYuan versions before v3.7.3 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getHeadingDeleteTransaction, getHeadingLevelTransaction, and getHeadingInsertTransaction endpoints that return rendered block DOM without publish-access checks. Anonymous readers or publish RoleReader tokens can supply a heading block ID to read full rendered content of publish-disabled documents that should be restricted.4d CVE-2026-685868.6 HIG

15.1%

——5SiYuan before v3.7.3 fails to apply publish-access filters to the getBacklinkDoc and getBackmentionDoc content endpoints (/api/ref/getBacklinkDoc and /api/ref/getBackmentionDoc). While the corresponding backlink list endpoints filter publish-forbidden documents, the content endpoints (gated only by CheckAuth) do not. A publish-mode reader — including an anonymous reader when publish Basic Auth is disabled — can call these endpoints directly with a publish-forbidden document's ID to retrieve its rendered DOM content and to determine whether the document references a given block (a reference-existence oracle).4d CVE-2026-685855.8 MED

9.2%

——3SiYuan versions before v3.7.3 contain a metadata disclosure vulnerability in the /api/block/getBlockInfo endpoint that returns document root metadata including title for publish-forbidden documents without publish-access checks. Anonymous readers or publish RoleReader tokens can supply a block ID to retrieve the title, notebook, path, root ID, and icon of documents administrators marked as excluded from publishing.4d CVE-2026-685848.6 HIG

23.4%

——7SiYuan versions before v3.7.3 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in publish mode where content-returning endpoints getHeadingChildrenDOM, getHeading*Transaction, and getBacklinkDoc perform no password check despite protecting the primary getDoc endpoint. Anonymous attackers can retrieve full content of password-protected documents by obtaining internal block IDs from reader-accessible endpoints and calling unprotected content endpoints to bypass the password gate.4d CVE-2026-676087.2 HIG

72.8%

——22Telenia Software TVox 26.5.3 and prior 26.x versions, and 24.9.21 and prior 24.x versions, contain an OS command injection vulnerability in action_audio.php that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by passing an unsanitized pid parameter into an exec() call when the action parameter is set to checkProcess. Attackers can inject malicious OS commands through the pid request parameter to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the apache user.27d CVE-2026-648279.8 CRI

39.3%

——12Telenia Software TVox 26.5.3 and prior 26.x versions, and 24.9.21 and prior 24.x versions, contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in set_env.php where the redirectToLoginAdminIRequestHaveAccessToken() function derives the current page name from PHP_SELF and skips authentication when the value matches 'login_admin.php'. Attackers can append '/login_admin.php' to the path of any target PHP script to cause the authentication check to pass and gain unauthenticated access to all PHP scripts under the manager HTML directory.24d CVE-2026-186427.8 HIG

3.2%

——1Deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in TUBITAK BILGEM Software Technologies Research Institute eta-otp-lock allows Object Injection. This issue affects eta-otp-lock: before 1.0.4.4d CVE-2026-186019.8 CRI

82.7%

——25A vulnerability was found in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. This impacts the function ovpn-client.check_config of the file /cgi-bin/glc of the component ovpn-client.so Native Plugin. Performing a manipulation of the argument filename results in command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability.18d CVE-2026-186008.8 HIG

79.1%

——24A vulnerability has been found in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. This affects the function network.switch_info/network.switch_status of the file /usr/lib/oui-httpd/rpc/network of the component Network Lua RPC Plugin. Such manipulation of the argument switch leads to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability.18d CVE-2026-181089.8 CRI

12.4%

——4Net::SAML2 versions before 0.86 for Perl allow authentication bypass because _verify_encrypted_assertion accepts an EncryptedAssertion whose decrypted content carries no signature. _verify_encrypted_assertion decrypts the EncryptedAssertion and returns it as verified when it carries no signature, via "return $xml unless $xpath->exists('dsig:Signature', $assert);". The signature check and the trust anchor check that follow run only when a signature is present, so a decrypted assertion with no dsig:Signature element reaches new_from_xml unverified and its NameID and attributes are read into the assertion object. An SP's encryption certificate is published in its SAML metadata so the IdP can encrypt to it, so any party can encrypt an unsigned assertion to that certificate, wrap it in a samlp:Response, and post it to the assertion consumer service. Any caller that configures a decryption key_file, and so accepts EncryptedAssertions, takes identity fields from an assertion that no trust anchor covers, and an unauthenticated party can authenticate as an arbitrary user. Callers with no key_file configured do not decrypt and are unaffected.24d CVE-2026-180928.1 HIG

9.3%

——3Net::SAML2 versions before 0.86 for Perl allow SAML authentication bypass via XML signature wrapping because new_from_xml reads assertion identity with document-wide XPath instead of the signed subtree. new_from_xml reads the NameID, attribute values, SessionIndex, audience and other identity fields with document-wide XPath, such as //saml:Assertion/saml:AttributeStatement/saml:Attribute and //saml:Subject/saml:NameID, which select the first matching element in document order rather than the element covered by the verified signature. handle_response confirms that a signature is present and, when a cacert is configured, that it chains to the CA, but XML::Sig verifies only the element named by the signature's Reference URI, so unsigned sibling assertions in the same document are not covered. An attacker who holds any one IdP-signed assertion can add an unsigned attacker-authored assertion earlier in document order; the signature still verifies and the document-order XPath returns the attacker's NameID and attributes. Any caller that passes an untrusted Response to new_from_xml can accept identity fields from an assertion the IdP never signed, even when a cacert trust anchor is configured, so a party holding one valid IdP-signed assertion can authenticate as an arbitrary user.24d CVE-2026-180897.5 HIG

7.1%

——2Net::SAML2 versions before 0.86 for Perl allow SAML authentication bypass by verifying responses against the response-embedded certificate in verify_xml when no trust anchor is configured. verify_xml in Net::SAML2::Role::VerifyXML runs "return if !$anchors && !$cacert;" as soon as the XML::Sig check succeeds, and that check uses the X.509 certificate taken from the response's own dsig:KeyInfo/dsig:X509Certificate element, so an unanchored response is checked only against the key it carries. Binding::POST declares cacert as an optional Maybe[Str] with no default, so a POST binding built without one takes that path, and _verify_encrypted_assertion returns early the same way with "return $xml unless $cacert;". Any caller that constructs Binding::POST or calls Assertion->new_from_xml without a cacert, cert_text, or anchors argument accepts a response signed by an attacker generated key whose self-signed certificate is embedded in that response, authenticating an arbitrary assertion.24d CVE-2026-566094.8 MED

0.8%

——0HCL iControl is affected by Weak SSL/TLS Version Supported vulnerability. It was observed that the application was using weak TLS versions such as TLS 1.0 and 1.1. These outdated protocols lack modern security features, making them vulnerable to known attacks and exposing sensitive information during data transmission.25d CVE-2026-566083.7 LOW

5.8%

——2HCL iControl is affected by Missing Access Control vulnerability. The application failed to enforce proper granular access controls, allowing users to access or view administrator-level functionalities without appropriate authorization.25d CVE-2026-23469.8 CRI

20.6%

——6Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Menulux Software Inc. Mobile App allows Software Integrity Attack. This issue affects Mobile App: through 12.05.2026.4d CVE-2026-185998.0 HIG

70.5%

——21A flaw has been found in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. The impacted element is the function logread.set_config of the file /usr/lib/oui-httpd/rpc/logread of the component Logread Lua RPC Plugin. This manipulation of the argument record_size causes command injection. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability.18d CVE-2026-185988.8 HIG

74.8%

——22A vulnerability was detected in GL.iNet GL-MT3000 up to 4.4.5. The affected element is the function logread.get_system_log of the file /usr/lib/oui-httpd/rpc/logread of the component Logread Lua RPC plugin. The manipulation of the argument module results in command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure and confirmed the existence of the vulnerability.18d CVE-2026-18574—

60.1%

——18An authentication bypass vulnerability in Check Point Security Management Server and Multi-Domain Security Management Server (MDS) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to Management services to execute arbitrary commands on the Security Management Server. Successful exploitation could result in full compromise of the Security Management system. Check Point discovered this issue internally and has no indication of active exploitation.26d CVE-2026-69082—

11.4%

——3CTI-Transmute contained a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the administrative user deletion functionality. The /account/delete/<id> endpoint accepted HTTP GET requests for an operation that modified application state. An unauthenticated remote attacker could construct a malicious link or embed a request targeting this endpoint and induce an authenticated CTI-Transmute administrator to visit the attacker-controlled content. If the administrator had an active session, the browser would automatically include the administrator’s session credentials, causing the selected user account to be deleted without the administrator intentionally confirming the operation. Successful exploitation requires interaction from a currently authenticated administrator who has permission to delete users. The attacker does not need a CTI-Transmute account or administrative privileges because the forged request executes using the victim administrator’s session. The vulnerability could allow an attacker to delete arbitrary user accounts, resulting in unauthorized modification of application state and denial of access for affected users. Depending on whether administrators can delete other administrators or the final administrative account, exploitation could also disrupt administration of the CTI-Transmute instance. The patch resolves the issue by restricting the deletion endpoint to HTTP POST requests and submitting the deletion through a form containing a CSRF token.4d CVE-2026-69079—

32.7%

——10CTI-Transmute contains an uncontrolled resource-consumption vulnerability in the unauthenticated /activity_timeline endpoint. The endpoint accepts a user-controlled days query parameter that was not restricted to a reasonable range. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could submit an excessively large value for this parameter, causing the application to retrieve and process activity data over an arbitrarily large period. This could consume excessive database, CPU, or memory resources, delay the processing of concurrent requests, or trigger an internal server error. Repeated requests could further degrade the availability of the CTI-Transmute website. The vulnerability is corrected by clamping the requested timeline range to a minimum of one day and a maximum of 1,095 days.4d CVE-2026-69078—

22.3%

——7CTI-Transmute is affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the evaluation report PDF-generation functionality. User-controlled CTI content, including conversion names, descriptions, and comments, is converted from Markdown to HTML and rendered as a PDF using WeasyPrint. Before the patch, the renderer used WeasyPrint’s default URL-fetching behavior without restricting the protocols or destinations that could be referenced by the generated HTML. An attacker able to supply content included in an evaluation report could inject crafted resource references using schemes such as http://, https://, or file://. When the report was rendered, CTI-Transmute could fetch these resources using the application server’s network connectivity and filesystem privileges. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to: * access services available only from the CTI-Transmute server or its internal network; * probe internal hosts and service endpoints; * retrieve local files readable by the application process; and * expose fetched content through the generated PDF, depending on the referenced resource type and rendering context. The vulnerability is corrected by providing WeasyPrint with a restrictive URL fetcher that permits only self-contained data: URIs. The externally hosted Google Fonts stylesheet was also removed so that PDF generation performs no intentional network or filesystem fetches.4d CVE-2026-687425.5 MED

0.5%

——0A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_parse_addr() function in the NSS responder does not validate the addrlen field against the remaining packet body size. A local attacker can exploit this via a crafted GETHOSTBYADDR request to the NSS responder socket, causing an out-of-bounds read and process crash, resulting in a denial of service.12d CVE-2026-33591—

42.3%

——13A vulnerability in Wapt Server before version 2.6.1.17813 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass security restriction using a specially crafted packet and retrieve a valid session token for the targeted account.27d CVE-2026-0392—

0.0%

——0eParakstītājs 3.0 for Windows before version 1.10.0 retrieves and executes its automatic updates over a channel that is not authenticated or integrity-protected. On each launch the application fetches an update descriptor (XML) over TLS but accepts any TLS certificate (a permissive TrustManager and a HostnameVerifier that always returns true), does not verify any digital signature on the update descriptor, and does not verify the Authenticode signature or a checksum of the downloaded installer before running it. A man-in-the-middle attacker able to redirect www.eparaksts.lv can serve a crafted update descriptor pointing to an attacker-controlled executable, which the client downloads and executes, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the victim host.26d CVE-2026-69075—

21.2%

——6FlowIntel is affected by a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability through multiple user-controlled or administrator-controlled fields. Persisted values—including case titles, ticket identifiers, recurring-case information, user profile attributes, organisation names, and role names—were rendered inside DOM elements subsequently compiled by Vue. Although normal HTML escaping could neutralize direct HTML markup, it did not prevent an attacker from injecting Vue interpolation expressions using the configured [[ ... ]] delimiters. An authenticated attacker able to modify one of the affected fields could store a malicious Vue expression. When another user viewed an affected case, report, profile, recurring-case page, or navigation component, Vue could evaluate the injected expression in the context of the FlowIntel application. Successful exploitation could allow arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim’s browser under the FlowIntel origin. This could expose information available to the victim, perform actions using the victim’s authenticated session, or modify application data within the victim’s privileges. The patch introduces a dedicated vue_escape filter that escapes HTML-sensitive characters and breaks Vue interpolation delimiters before the values are rendered. The filter is applied to the affected case, account, organisation, role, configuration, and navigation fields.4d