Vulnerabilities exploitable today
16,626in current view
Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.
In KEV catalog1,748
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,665
Distribution · last window
- Critical3,503
- High15,971
- Medium14,886
- Low1,471
Filters
Window
Severity
Flags
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2026-1002988.8 HIG19.8%
——6In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, two user‑information endpoints can reveal sensitive device and account details under conditions that are not intended for normal operation.21dCVE-2026-1002975.3 MED7.8%
——2In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, an unauthenticated network check function can be triggered to probe arbitrary hosts from the device’s internal network. This may expose internal information or leak data via DNS queries.21dCVE-2026-1002968.1 HIG26.1%
——8In Anjvision YSSD-RTMP-H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, an empty-body POST to /setUserConfig, dispatched through the web server's SOAP-RPC handler, silently downgrades the administrator password to the default value and corrupts the in-memory authentication state until the device reloads. The handler does not verify the session's privilege level, so any authenticated user can trigger it.21dCVE-2026-1002956.3 MED10.1%
——3In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, an internal debug interface can be enabled through an undocumented pathway, exposing functions not intended for normal operation. When activated, this interface allows actions that could unintentionally provide elevated system access.21dCVE-2026-1002947.5 HIG13.2%
——4In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, the firmware embeds hardcoded cloud‑API credentials that are shared across deployed devices. Anyone obtaining the public firmware package can reuse these values to interact with the cloud service in ways not intended for normal operation.21dCVE-2026-1002938.8 HIG6.8%
——2In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, both the local and cloud update mechanisms apply new firmware without any cryptographic verification, relying only on basic hashing. This design allows an attacker who can reach the update routine to introduce untrusted firmware images that the device will accept as valid.21dCVE-2026-1002928.8 HIG20.1%
——6In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, a hidden debug interface can be enabled through an authenticated request, allowing additional commands to be sent to a backend service. Once active, this pathway can unintentionally expose system‑level functionality that could be misused if crafted inputs reach the underlying command handler.21dCVE-2026-1002919.8 CRI24.8%
——7In Anjvision YSSD‑RTMP‑H5 firmware version 3.3.2.4, several ONVIF service endpoints process management requests without enforcing required authentication. This could allow an unauthorized attacker to access sensitive device operations.21dCVE-2024-31027—16.7%
——5Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Greek Universities Network (GUnet) Open eClass Platform v.3.15 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the last name, first name, and username parameters in the user registration functionality.21dCVE-2024-310269.8 CRI47.1%
——14An issue in Greek Universities Network (GUnet) Open eClass Platform v.3.15 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the chat input field in the course module.20dCVE-2026-1028318.1 HIG8.7%
——3JupyterLab is an extensible environment for interactive and reproducible computing, based on the Jupyter Notebook Architecture. From JupyterLab 4.5.0 until 4.5.11 and 4.6.4, from Notebook 7.5.0 until 7.6.3, and from JupyterLite Core 0.7.0 until 0.8.4, the system clipboard cell-paste path accepts attacker-controlled cell JSON without clearing metadata.trusted. When useSystemClipboardForCells is active and pasteCodeCellsWithoutOutput is disabled, a pasted code cell can mark HTML output as trusted, bypass output sanitization, and execute script in the authenticated JupyterLab origin without executing the cell. Markdown and raw cells are not affected because their output is sanitized. This issue is fixed in JupyterLab 4.5.11 and 4.6.4, Notebook 7.6.3, and JupyterLite Core 0.8.4.19dCVE-2026-1028306.8 MED17.2%
——5JupyterLab is an extensible environment for interactive and reproducible computing, based on the Jupyter Notebook Architecture. From JupyterLab 3.0.0 until 4.5.11 and 4.6.4, and in JupyterLite Core 0.8.3 and earlier, the Plural-Forms header in a selected third-party language pack can append JavaScript after a valid plural rule because prefix-only regular-expression validation accepts a matching prefix without requiring the entire header to match. JupyterLab passes the accepted expression to new Function, so loading the catalogue and translating a plural string executes the appended code in the authenticated JupyterLab origin. Where Jupyter Server kernels, terminals, and APIs are exposed, the code can use authenticated server APIs to read or modify files and run code. Impact is much more limited in JupyterLite because it typically lacks most exposed Jupyter Server surfaces. The default English locale is unaffected because it does not load a translation catalogue. This issue is fixed in JupyterLab 4.5.11 and 4.6.4 and JupyterLite Core 0.8.4.21dCVE-2026-102829—18.7%
——6simple-git, an interface for running git commands in any node.js application, enables applications to execute Git operations from JavaScript. Prior to 2.0.1 of the argv-parser package, parseEnv omits VISUAL from GitEnvKeys, so prepareEnv drops the value before vulnerabilityCheck can classify it as allowUnsafeEditor. A consuming application that forwards attacker-influenced environment values can therefore allow Git to invoke an attacker-selected editor during operations such as commit amendment or interactive rebase when no higher-priority editor setting overrides VISUAL and Git's terminal prerequisites are met. The executable runs with the privileges of the Node.js process. This issue is fixed in argv-parser 2.0.1.21dCVE-2026-1028289.8 CRI30.0%
——9simple-git, an interface for running git commands in any node.js application, enables applications to execute Git operations from JavaScript. From 3.15.0 until 4.0.1, the default blockUnsafeOperationsPlugin does not classify trailer.<token>.cmd as unsafe configuration. An application that passes attacker-controlled values through SimpleGitOptions.config or inline -c arguments can therefore allow Git to invoke an attacker-selected shell command when git interpret-trailers processes the configured trailer. The command executes with the operating-system identity and permissions of the Node.js process. This issue is fixed in 4.0.1.12dCVE-2026-1028278.1 HIG32.2%
——10simple-git, an interface for running git commands in any node.js application, enables applications to execute Git operations from JavaScript. Prior to 4.0.0, the default blockUnsafeOperationsPlugin compares parsed option names with literal dangerous option spellings while Git accepts unambiguous long-option abbreviations. Attacker-influenced push arguments such as abbreviated --receive-pack or --exec forms can therefore bypass detectVulnerableFlags, reach git push against a local or file remote or an attacker-influenced receive-pack target, and cause Git to invoke an attacker-selected command in consumers that expose those arguments. The clone-side abbreviation handling does not protect the push path. This issue is fixed in 4.0.0.12dCVE-2026-1028268.1 HIG38.8%
——12simple-git, an interface for running git commands in any node.js application, enables applications to execute Git operations from JavaScript. Prior to 4.0.0, the default blockUnsafeOperationsPlugin does not completely reject configuration includes supplied through customArgs to git.clone(). The missing include.path classification permits Git to load an attacker-controlled configuration file, and the initial remediation does not cover includeIf.<condition>.path, allowing the same file-loading primitive through a conditional include. A loaded configuration can set an executable Git option such as core.sshCommand, which Git invokes during the clone operation with the privileges of the Node.js process. Exploitation requires the application to pass attacker-influenced custom arguments and requires an attacker-controlled file that the process can read. This issue is fixed in 4.0.0.12dCVE-2026-1028253.7 LOW19.4%
——6Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.62.6, the USERAUTH_REQUEST path reached from server::run_stream in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs increments self.common.auth_attempts but never compares it with server::Config.max_auth_attempts. An unauthenticated remote client can continue submitting authentication requests on one connection beyond the configured cap, bypassing the deployment's attempt-limiting policy and increasing online guessing opportunity and backend authentication workload. This issue is fixed in version 0.62.6.21dCVE-2026-1028244.3 MED3.1%
——1Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.0, the hybrid ML-KEM 768 and X25519 implementation in russh/src/kex/hybrid_mlkem.rs accepts an all-zero 32-byte peer X25519 public key in both server_dh and compute_shared_secret, forcing the X25519 contribution to the combined shared secret to zero. A malicious SSH peer can therefore make the combined secret depend only on ML-KEM, defeating the hybrid exchange's intended fallback protection if ML-KEM is later weakened. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.0.21dCVE-2026-1028237.5 HIG16.8%
——5Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.1, client_read_authenticated in russh/src/client/encrypted.rs forwards CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_OPEN_FAILURE, CHANNEL_SUCCESS, CHANNEL_FAILURE, and CHANNEL_REQUEST subtypes exit-status, exit-signal, and xon-xoff to public client::Handler callbacks without confirming that the ChannelId belongs to a channel the client opened and established. A malicious SSH server can send lifecycle events for predicted, unopened, unconfirmed, or released channel identifiers, causing application panics or corrupting command completion and exit-code tracking. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.1.19dCVE-2026-1028223.7 LOW24.3%
——7Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.1, a connection configured to permit mac=none can negotiate it with a MAC-requiring CTR or CBC block cipher because the selection logic validates needs_mac() only when MAC selection fails. A remote peer can then send a packet with a decrypted length of zero, causing russh/src/cipher/mod.rs to shrink the previously read block before indexing buffer.buffer[16..], which panics and terminates the connection task. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.1.21dCVE-2026-1028216.5 MED20.8%
——6Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.2, an authenticated remote peer can send SSH_MSG_KEXINIT without the required SSH_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT and then flood SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN messages while SessionKexState::InProgress prevents priority_receiver in russh/src/server/session.rs from being drained. The server continues processing network input and enqueues a ChannelOpenReply for each request on an unbounded channel, allowing one connection to grow memory until the process is terminated. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.2.21dCVE-2026-1028206.2 MED2.3%
——1pageant provides a [PageantStream] type that implements [AsyncRead] and [AsyncWrite] traits and can be used to talk to a running Pageant instance. Prior to pageant 0.2.3, the Windows pageant crate's pageant/src/wmmessage.rs MemoryMap::read function trusts a peer-controlled u32 response length supplied through the 8192-byte Pageant shared-memory mapping reached by AgentClient::connect_pageant. A local process that impersonates the Pageant window can make query_pageant_direct allocate up to approximately 4 GiB and copy beyond the mapped view, reliably crashing a russh client and conditionally exposing adjacent committed memory. This issue is fixed in pageant 0.2.3.21dCVE-2026-1026167.3 HIG15.9%
——5A vulnerability was detected in risesoft-y9 WorkFlow-Engine up to 9.6.10. Impacted is the function getByIdAndYear of the file CustomHistoricProcessServiceImpl.java of the component OAuth2 Resource Filter. Performing a manipulation of the argument year/processInstanceId results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The sink is injectable on two independent positions, not just one. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.21dCVE-2026-953856.5 MED21.1%
——6Inappropriate implementation in PlatformIntegration in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)19dCVE-2026-953845.3 MED12.5%
——4Race condition in Transactions Platform in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to potentially leak sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)19dCVE-2026-953826.5 MED23.3%
——7Improper input validation in Auth in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)19dCVE-2026-953818.3 HIG36.2%
——11Improper input validation in Printing in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)19dCVE-2026-953808.8 HIG37.9%
——11Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)19dCVE-2026-953768.0 HIG9.4%
——3Externally controlled reference in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed an adjacent attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium)20dCVE-2026-953756.3 MED10.2%
——3Incorrect authorization in BrowserTag in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)20dCVE-2026-953746.5 MED19.5%
——6Incorrect authorization in Network in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)19dCVE-2026-953738.8 HIG31.9%
——10Use after free in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)19dCVE-2026-953728.3 HIG33.3%
——10Use after free in Chromecast in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)19dCVE-2026-953715.4 MED10.8%
——3Missing authorization in Views in Google Chrome on on Mac prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)21dCVE-2026-953705.4 MED10.8%
——3Inappropriate implementation in NFC in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)20dCVE-2026-953698.8 HIG34.3%
——10Inappropriate implementation in XML in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)20dCVE-2026-953684.3 MED15.2%
——5Incorrect authorization in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)20dCVE-2026-953675.3 MED19.6%
——6Information leak in DataTransfer in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process and leveraged social engineering to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)20dCVE-2026-953666.5 MED19.7%
——6Use of released resource in Core in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)20dCVE-2026-953658.8 HIG37.9%
——11Type confusion in IndexedDB in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)20d