PULSE
FEED
ransombooba project reclama a LifeFone · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a National Association of Credit Management · US · Financial Servicesransombooba project reclama a California School Boards Association · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a South Weber City · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Programs for Parents, Inc. · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a Circleville Police Department · US · Government & Defenseransomemperador reclama a MAA Group Consulting Engineers · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a ClaimTek Systems · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturingransombooba project reclama a LifeFone · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a National Association of Credit Management · US · Financial Servicesransombooba project reclama a California School Boards Association · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a South Weber City · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Programs for Parents, Inc. · US · Educationransombooba project reclama a Circleville Police Department · US · Government & Defenseransomemperador reclama a MAA Group Consulting Engineers · Professional Servicesransomrhysida reclama a ClaimTek Systems · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a xspringcapital.com · SG · Financial Servicesransomlockbit5 reclama a susannecerda.com · MXransomanubis reclama a Santiam Hospital & Clinics · US · Healthcareransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Lowenstein Sandler LLP · US · Professional Servicesransompear reclama a Cyrious Software · US · Technologyransomwallstreet reclama a Fortrex · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch405,327 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

405,327in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,762
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,694

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    5,648
  • High
    21,802
  • Medium
    20,242
  • Low
    2,110
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities18,761–18,800 · 405,327
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2007-0051—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2012-0981—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-4197—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-1999-0492—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-41966—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2026-32267—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2014-1631—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2021-27320—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2017-15041—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-0833—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2026-334399.8 CRI
95.4%
——29Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.0.6, OpenIdentityPlatform OpenAM is vulnerable to pre-authentication Remote Code Execution (RCE) via unsafe Java deserialization of the jato.clientSession HTTP parameter. This bypasses the WhitelistObjectInputStream mitigation that was applied to the jato.pageSession parameter after CVE-2021-35464. An unauthenticated attacker can achieve arbitrary command execution on the server by sending a crafted serialized Java object as the jato.clientSession GET/POST parameter to any JATO ViewBean endpoint whose JSP contains <jato:form> tags (e.g., the Password Reset pages). This vulnerability is fixed in 16.0.6.97d
CVE-2021-445335.3 MED
95.4%
——29Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.21d
CVE-2026-0926—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2010-0519—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2006-3735—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2008-6922—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2006-6493—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2005-1052—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2010-2931—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2004-1298—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-2270—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-39802—
95.3%
——29——
CVE-2010-2004—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-1000140—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-2540—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-0641—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-2136—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2019-9023—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-5305—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-0945—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2015-7945—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2020-28026—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2018-9038—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2009-3840—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2025-595387.5 HIG
95.4%
——29Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. For versions 2.9.0-rc1 through 2.14.19, 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.6 and 3.0.17, when the webhook.azuredevops.username and webhook.azuredevops.password are not set in the default configuration, the /api/webhook endpoint crashes the entire argocd-server process when it receives an Azure DevOps Push event whose JSON array resource.refUpdates is empty. The slice index [0] is accessed without a length check, causing an index-out-of-range panic. A single unauthenticated HTTP POST is enough to kill the process. This issue is resolved in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.17d
CVE-2018-16021—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-37989—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2022-28365—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2002-1486—
95.4%
——29——
CVE-2007-0480—
95.4%
——29——