PULSE
FEED
ransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a corp-smart.com · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a rolly.io · Technologyransomemperador reclama a LA PROFUMERIA SRL · IT · Retail & E-Commerceransomscarlettgroup reclama a sunnybrook.ca · CA · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a au.bank.in · IN · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Udima · ES · Educationransomqilin reclama a W Interactive · GB · Technologyransomshiba reclama a IT Foods Industries · Agriculture and Food Productionransomshiba reclama a Friendly Senior Living · Healthcareransomshiba reclama a Morgan White Group · Professional Servicesransomshiba reclama a Antwerp House Dentistry · GB · Healthcareransomeverstake reclama a as*****g.comransomeverstake reclama a ca*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a in*****s.comransomeverstake reclama a corp-smart.com · Technologyransomwhitearmor reclama a rolly.io · Technologyransomemperador reclama a LA PROFUMERIA SRL · IT · Retail & E-Commerceransomscarlettgroup reclama a sunnybrook.ca · CA · Healthcareransomscarlettgroup reclama a au.bank.in · IN · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Udima · ES · Educationransomqilin reclama a W Interactive · GB · Technology
CVE Watch405,425 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

405,425in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,762
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,694

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    5,621
  • High
    21,758
  • Medium
    20,122
  • Low
    2,115
Filters
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities19,321–19,360 · 405,425
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2011-2457—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2024-27903—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2021-38306—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-0313—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-2276—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2002-0449—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2023-49007—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2019-1092—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-2363—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2011-2744—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-4933—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2001-0080—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-15644—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2025-5502—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-4982—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2026-672768.1 HIG
95.2%
——29RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the key type and modulus but omitting the exponent. Because signature verification uses the client-supplied key, an attacker knowing an authorized RSA modulus can supply a key with exponent one, forge a valid signature, and open an SSH command channel as the target user without the private key.This issue affects only 7.x branch was fixed in versions: 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)34d
CVE-2017-8605—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2001-0899—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2004-0409—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2012-5641—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2006-3144—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2024-29976—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2004-1269—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2014-8461—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2002-0737—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-4338—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-4931—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2011-2456—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2007-3336—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2014-8445—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-2521—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2010-1840—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2008-4401—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2008-1561—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2019-11269—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2022-22707—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2015-2783—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2017-8750—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2018-14418—
95.2%
——29——
CVE-2019-6224—
95.2%
——29——