PULSE
LIVE0signals / 24h
FEED
vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-25249 — Fortinet / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87491 — Google / Chromium V8vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-20079 — Cisco / Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall ManagementvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-75650 — Adobe / Commerce and MagentovulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-81963 — Microsoft / WindowsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86218 — N-able / N-centralvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-76461 — Cisco / Secure Email GatewayvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-84869 — ConnectWise / ScreenConnectvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42016 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-42018 — JFrog / ArtifactoryvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-85706 — GitLab / Community Edition and Enterprise EditionvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86060 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-67277 — MikroTik / RouterOSvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-19490 — Citrix / NetScalervulnKEV agrega CVE-2025-25249 — Fortinet / Multiple ProductsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-87491 — Google / Chromium V8vulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-20079 — Cisco / Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall ManagementvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-75650 — Adobe / Commerce and MagentovulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-81963 — Microsoft / WindowsvulnKEV agrega CVE-2026-86218 — N-able / N-central
CVE Watch375,890 in full archive

Vulnerabilities exploitable today

375,890in current view

Single score combining CVSS, KEV membership and EPSS. Every CVE with its own record — timeline from publication to active exploitation.

In KEV catalog1,710
New KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,646

Distribution · last window

  • Critical
    2,384
  • High
    8,714
  • Medium
    6,699
  • Low
    725
Filters

Window

Severity

Flags

Vulnerabilities267,721–267,760 · 375,890
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTitleMod.
CVE-2023-46083
28.3%
8
CVE-2019-17356
28.3%
8
CVE-2015-7751
28.3%
8
CVE-2023-5100
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-802134.0 MED
28.3%
8An issue was discovered in the resolv gem before 0.7.2 for Ruby. Resolv::DNS::MessageEncoder wrote a DNS label's length into a single octet without checking its range. A label longer than 255 octets had its length stored modulo 256 but the label data was written unchanged, and thus the bytes on the wire described a different name than the one the application asked to encode. RFC 1035 section 2.3.4 limits a label to 63 octets, and the two high bits of the length octet are reserved for compression pointers. put_string packed the length with put_pack("C", d.length) and put_label used it for labels, and thus any value from 0 to 255 could end up as a label length octet, including the reserved 0x40-0xBF range and the 0xC0-0xFF pointer range. Resolv::DNS::Name.create did not check per-label or total name length either, and thus an attacker-controlled hostname reached the encoder unchanged. An application that resolves an attacker-controlled hostname sends a query whose wire bytes name a domain the attacker chose. A hostname suffix that the application validates against an allowlist becomes padding that never appears on the wire, and thus allowlist and egress checks can be bypassed. The recursive resolver caches the response under the attacker's name, and DNS logs record that name rather than the one the application asked for. A label length whose low octet lands in the 0xC0-0xFF range produces a length octet that conforming parsers read as the start of a compression pointer, with the following attacker-controlled byte as the offset.7d
CVE-2023-47187
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-134458.1 HIG
28.3%
8IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (confidentiality breach). In overwrite mode, the attacker can replace victim file contents with arbitrary data (integrity breach). This breaks the storage ownership boundary between users.56d
CVE-2025-54288
28.3%
8
CVE-2023-51315
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-874786.5 MED
28.3%
8Observable discrepancy in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)7d
CVE-2025-43008
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-10614
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-22783
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-759608.1 HIG
28.3%
8Rently Smart Home versions 20.1.0 and prior are vulnerable to an Insufficiently Protected Credentials vulnerability. This could allow an attacker to retrieve pins including the Master Pin, overriding standard user permissions.8d
CVE-2026-25814
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-3404
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-23164
28.3%
8
CVE-2023-46073
28.3%
8
CVE-2019-0009
28.3%
8
CVE-2023-51330
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-4955
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-45732
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-22592
28.3%
8
CVE-2023-51312
28.3%
8
CVE-2023-47225
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-24597
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-44400
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-659487.3 HIG
28.3%
8UnixAuth lacks brute-force protection in Apache Ranger versions <= 2.8.0.  Note:  UnixAuth is NOT a recommended option for production deployments.  Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.9.0, which fixes this issue.30d
CVE-2025-24017
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-162052.4 LOW
28.3%
8A weakness has been identified in Pluck CMS up to 4.7.21. This vulnerability affects the function htmlspecialchars_decode of the file data/modules/albums/albums.admin.php of the component Albums Module. Executing a manipulation of the argument Info can lead to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.58d
CVE-2025-5688
28.3%
8
CVE-2026-54842
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-22319
28.3%
8
CVE-2008-4955
28.3%
8
CVE-2024-12226
28.3%
8
CVE-2024-236828.2 HIG
28.3%
8Artemis Java Test Sandbox versions before 1.8.0 are vulnerable to a sandbox escape when an attacker includes class files in a package that Ares trusts. An attacker can abuse this issue to execute arbitrary Java when a victim executes the supposedly sandboxed code.64d
CVE-2026-27480
28.3%
8
CVE-2024-12142
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-24759
28.3%
8
CVE-2025-9439
28.3%
8