PULSE
FEED
ransombooba project reclama a Aesthetic Specialty Centre · PK · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a City of Big Spring · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a KING FAMILY MEDICAL · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a Charter Township of Commerce · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Regent Christian Online Academy · CA · Educationransomaurora reclama a GreenbergFarrow · Professional Servicesransomwallstreet reclama a Bristol City Council · GB · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a NuVista Federal Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Hawaii Law Enforcement Fedral Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #111 · AEransomeverest reclama a OR Technology · Technologyransomeverest reclama a Burris & MacOmber · Professional Servicesransomeverest reclama a Energy Storage Terminal in Singapore · SG · Energy & Utilitiesransomeverest reclama a Point Robotics · Technologyransombooba project reclama a Aesthetic Specialty Centre · PK · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a City of Big Spring · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a KING FAMILY MEDICAL · US · Healthcareransombooba project reclama a Charter Township of Commerce · US · Government & Defenseransombooba project reclama a Regent Christian Online Academy · CA · Educationransomaurora reclama a GreenbergFarrow · Professional Servicesransomwallstreet reclama a Bristol City Council · GB · Government & Defenseransomqilin reclama a NuVista Federal Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomqilin reclama a Hawaii Law Enforcement Fedral Credit Union · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #111 · AEransomeverest reclama a OR Technology · Technologyransomeverest reclama a Burris & MacOmber · Professional Servicesransomeverest reclama a Energy Storage Terminal in Singapore · SG · Energy & Utilitiesransomeverest reclama a Point Robotics · Technology
← Todos los CVEs
CVE Watch24 jul 2026

CVE-2026-33467

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) in Elastic Package Registry could allow an attacker positioned to intercept netwo

CVSS

5.9

Medio

EPSS

0.1%

p3

KEV

—

Exploit Today

1

0-100

Publicado: 28 abr 2026 · Última mod.: 24 jul 2026 · CWE-347

EPSS · 30d
0.1%EPSS · 30 días0.2%
2026-09-282026-10-26
Descripción técnica

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) in Elastic Package Registry could allow an attacker positioned to intercept network traffic, or to otherwise influence the contents served to a self-hosted registry, to substitute a tampered package without the integrity check failing closed.

Referencias oficiales
CVEs relacionados
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.
CVE-2026-106078—
—
———A vulnerability allowing an unauthenticated attacker to bypass REST API authentication with a forged federation token and receive responses from REST API endpoints that do not call the Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 backup service.45m
CVE-2026-1176028.4 ALT
—
———Electrum 4.6.0 before 4.7.2 contains an authorization bypass in the external plugin loader, which executes a plugin's __init__.py module when the plugin is marked enabled in the config file, without verifying its plugin-password signature. A rogue local process with write access to the Electrum data directory can place plugin code in the plugins/ folder and mark it enabled, causing arbitrary code execution inside the Electrum process.2h
CVE-2026-1176017.5 ALT
—
———Electrum before 4.8.3 fails to verify signatures of wallet-owned inputs in unconfirmed mempool transactions, allowing malicious servers to replace a just-broadcast transaction with a conflicting one. Attackers can swallow the user's transaction and display an invalid zero-fee copy paying an attacker address, tricking users into RBF fee-bumping and signing it.2h
CVE-2026-65632—
—
——0The jose library accepts ECDSA (ES256, ES256K, ES384, and ES512) JWS signatures of a non-canonical length. When verifying an ECDSA signature, jose_jwk_kty_ec:verify/4 in src/jwk/jose_jwk_kty_ec.erl splits the raw signature in half by its actual byte length (split_binary(Signature, byte_size(Signature) div 2)) instead of enforcing the fixed length required by RFC 7518 §3.4, and then decodes each half with crypto:bytes_to_integer/1, which ignores leading zero bytes. As a result, an attacker who holds one valid token can prepend leading zero bytes to each of the R and S halves to produce longer signatures that still split evenly and decode to the same (r, s) pair, so many distinct signature byte strings all verify against the same key (signature malleability). This does not allow forging new payloads or impersonating a signer, because the underlying (r, s) values are unchanged. It does defeat any security control that assumes a valid token or its signature is unique, such as token-revocation-by-hash, replay or idempotency caches, and deduplication logic. This issue affects jose: from 1.0.0 before 1.11.13.3h
CVE-2026-1161168.2 ALT
0.4%
——0A vulnerability was detected in Yoosee GM8135S Camera 21.00.01.36. Affected is an unknown function of the component Secure Boot. Performing a manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.1d
CVE-2026-1161897.5 ALT
4.1%
——1rclone from 1.55.0 before 1.75.2 contains a signature verification bypass in stable selfupdate that trusts checksums from unsigned bytes preceding the PGP-clearsigned SHA256SUMS block. Attackers controlling the release distribution path can prepend an unsigned checksum line matching a malicious archive, causing selfupdate to install an attacker-controlled rclone executable.1d