CVE Watch403,583 en archivo total

Vulnerabilidades explotables hoy

16,339en la vista actual

Score único combinando CVSS, membresía KEV y EPSS. Cada CVE con su ficha propia — timeline desde publicación hasta explotación activa.

En catálogo KEV1,758

Nuevos KEV · 24H0

Exploit Today ≥ 701,691

Distribución · última ventana

Crítico
5,587
Alto
21,596
Medio
20,043
Bajo
2,106

Filtros

Ventana

Severidad

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades16,321–16,339 · 16,339

CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExplotTítuloVis.

CVE-2026-887769.8 CRÍ

54.1%

——16Memory overflow vulnerability vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior or Denial of Service28d CVE-2026-887759.8 CRÍ

53.6%

——16Memory overflow vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior or Denial of Service28d CVE-2026-887747.2 ALT

33.4%

——10Vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to a feature policy bypass due to improper HTTP URL based expression usage.28d CVE-2026-8877310.0 CRÍ

88.6%

——27Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling') vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1-37.279 and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 FIPS and before 13.1-64.23.28d CVE-2026-887728.1 ALT

99.6%

KEV—80Citrix NetScaler Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer Vulnerability29d CVE-2026-887719.8 CRÍ

99.7%

KEV—80Citrix NetScaler Improper Input Validation Vulnerability28d CVE-2026-1010506.5 MED

31.7%

——10Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify the X-Telegram-Bot-Api-Secret-Token header on Telegram webhook endpoints when credential_id is absent or secret_token is empty. Remote unauthenticated attackers can post forged Telegram updates to trigger workflows with the owner's configured credentials and execute actions on attacker-supplied input.29d CVE-2026-1010496.5 MED

31.7%

——10Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify Slack request signatures when trigger nodes lack credential IDs or have empty signing secrets. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials.29d CVE-2026-1010426.4 MED

11.5%

——3Parse Server is an open-source backend server. In versions >= 9.0.0 < 9.10.1-alpha.10 and >= 8.0.2 < 8.6.91, the code-based authentication adapters (GitHub, Google Play Games, Instagram, LINE, LinkedIn, Microsoft, QQ, Spotify, WeChat, Weibo) verify the client's authorization code with the external provider on signup and on provider linking, but not when authentication data is supplied together with a username and password on the login endpoint. As a result, a low-privileged authenticated user can attach an arbitrary, unverified provider identity to their own account without the provider ever being contacted, spoofing an external identity toward application logic that trusts the linked provider ID. An attacker can also pre-hijack accounts: by claiming the provider ID of a victim who has not yet linked that provider, the victim's later legitimate sign-in with that provider resolves to the attacker's account. Only deployments configuring one of the affected code-based auth adapters are impacted. Versions 9.10.1-alpha.10 and 8.6.91 fix the issue by running the adapter's credential verification on the login and challenge endpoints and rejecting a provider identity already linked to another user. As a workaround, disable the affected code-based auth adapters.30d CVE-2026-101041—

13.6%

——4The account recovery (password reset) functionality in the vulnerability-lookup web application contains a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the consumption of single-use recovery tokens. The original implementation verified the token nonce against the stored digest and then consumed (cleared) it in separate database operations. Two concurrent HTTP requests presenting the same valid recovery token could both pass the verification check before either transaction committed, allowing both to set their own password on the target account. The last transaction to commit overwrites the first, enabling an attacker who possesses a valid recovery token to replace the legitimate user's password with one of their choosing. A secondary defect in the same endpoint (confirm_account) allowed a valid recovery link to be used to set an empty or trivially short password (e.g., three characters). The view handler performed only a manual equality comparison between the two password fields and never invoked the form's validation logic, bypassing the intended minimum-length and complexity constraints. The affected component is the user account recovery endpoint (/user/confirm_account/<token>) and the associated token verification and consumption logic in the User model (website/models/user.py) and the view layer (website/web/views/user.py).28d CVE-2026-1010334.3 MED

12.7%

——4KitchenOwl through 0.7.10 fails to verify that category IDs belong to the caller's household in expense and item operations. Authenticated attackers can enumerate category IDs from other households to read their category names, budgets, and colors, breaking household isolation.29d CVE-2026-1010327.0 ALT

3.9%

——1navi through 2.24.0 fails to properly escape cheatsheet variable values when substituting them into shell commands. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters through crafted file names in suggestion command directories to execute arbitrary commands with victim privileges.29d CVE-2026-1008727.5 ALT

12.3%

——4Sylius versions before 2.1.16 and 2.2.9 fail to validate payment amounts during cart recalculation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to modify order totals after gateway transaction initiation. Attackers can pay a small amount, enlarge the order after gateway capture, and have the system mark the inflated order as fully paid while the gateway captured only the original amount.29d CVE-2026-1008718.8 ALT

23.5%

——7Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 fail to include firewall identification in JWT tokens issued by separate Admin and Shop API endpoints. Attackers can register a shop customer account using an administrator's email address and obtain a token that the Admin API resolves to that administrator, granting full administrative access.29d CVE-2026-1008708.8 ALT

23.7%

——7Sylius versions before 1.12.25, 1.13.17, 1.14.20, 2.1.16, and 2.2.9 build administrator password-reset links using the request Host header without validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect reset tokens to attacker-controlled domains. Attackers can request password resets for known administrator email addresses with forged Host headers to intercept valid reset tokens and take over administrator accounts.29d CVE-2026-1008695.9 MED

17.9%

——5Sylius versions before 2.1.16 and 2.2.9 fail to restrict payment request actions in the Shop API endpoint, allowing customers to trigger refunds on completed orders. Attackers with order tokens can submit arbitrary payment actions like refunds that payment gateways execute while Sylius maintains order as paid, causing financial loss.29d CVE-2026-1008686.3 MED

44.9%

——13Penpot before 2.18.0 binds the MCP server plugin WebSocket bridge to all network interfaces without authentication in single-user mode. Unauthenticated attackers on adjacent networks can connect to the WebSocket port to impersonate the Penpot browser plugin, intercept task payloads, and return forged results to the MCP client.19d CVE-2026-1008673.3 BAJ

1.7%

——1spaceship-prompt through 4.22.5 fails to sanitize control characters from project manifest version fields before rendering them in the zsh prompt. Attackers can embed ANSI/OSC escape sequences in version fields of package manifests to manipulate terminal output, rewrite window titles, or spoof displayed text when victims enter the directory.29d CVE-2026-1008663.3 BAJ

2.4%

——1onefetch through 2.28.1 writes repository information field values to the terminal without removing control characters, allowing terminal escape sequence injection. Attackers can embed ANSI/OSC escape sequences in project manifest version and name fields to manipulate terminal output, rewrite window titles, hide text, or trigger emulator-specific behavior when victims run onefetch.30d