PULSE
FEED
ransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Hallmark Cards, Inc. · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Scry Analytics · US · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a ZipAI · VN · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... R...ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #137 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #136 · DKransomn0n reclama a Company #135 · IDransomn0n reclama a Company #134 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #133 · USransomredact reclama a Omni Hotels & Resorts · US · Hospitalityransomqilin reclama a Rotstein & Shiffman · IL · Professional Servicesransomn0n reclama a Max Fashion · AE · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Hallmark Cards, Inc. · US · Retail & E-Commerceransomn0n reclama a Scry Analytics · US · Technologyransomvexy ransomware reclama a ZipAI · VN · Technologyransomsilentransomgroup reclama a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP · US · Professional Servicesransomsilentransomgroup reclama a W... R...ransomqilin reclama a Insurance Audit Services · US · Financial Servicesransomn0n reclama a Company #137 · CAransomn0n reclama a Company #136 · DKransomn0n reclama a Company #135 · IDransomn0n reclama a Company #134 · USransomn0n reclama a Company #133 · USransomredact reclama a Omni Hotels & Resorts · US · Hospitality
CVE Watch408.844 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

4,383na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,768
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,724
  • Alta
    22,266
  • Média
    21,740
  • Baixa
    2,172
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades841–880 · 4,383
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2019-20501—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-6909—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2020-17463—
99.8%
KEV—80Fuel CMS SQL Injection Vulnerability—
CVE-2021-20123—
99.8%
KEV—80Draytek VigorConnect Path Traversal Vulnerability —
CVE-2018-7358—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2024-37032—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2010-2568—
99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Windows Remote Code Execution Vulnerability—
CVE-2018-159827.8 ALT
99.8%
KEVR80Adobe Flash Player Use-After-Free Vulnerability36d
CVE-2012-1426—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-27253—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2011-3923—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2016-2776—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-45288—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2024-1071—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2026-422089.8 CRÍ
99.8%
KEV—80BerriAI LiteLLM SQL Injection Vulnerability11d
CVE-2018-14417—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2013-1359—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2010-3333—
99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Office Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability—
CVE-2026-90829.8 CRÍ
99.8%
KEV—80Drupal Core SQL Injection Vulnerability30d
CVE-2022-24716—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2018-15708—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2017-56459.8 CRÍ
99.8%
——30In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code.29d
CVE-2017-5521—
99.8%
KEV—80NETGEAR Multiple Devices Exposure of Sensitive Information Vulnerability—
CVE-2019-5420—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2019-7195—
99.8%
KEVR80QNAP Photo Station Path Traversal Vulnerability—
CVE-2012-1423—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2021-25921—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2020-25687—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2020-35489—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2022-1707—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-21547—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2006-0026—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2018-14839—
99.8%
KEV—80LG N1A1 NAS Remote Command Execution Vulnerability—
CVE-2012-1439—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2012-1445—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2021-21307—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-46214—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2023-32563—
99.8%
——30——
CVE-2020-0601—
99.8%
KEV—80Microsoft Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability—
CVE-2016-2107—
99.8%
——30——