Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje
17,580na visualização atual
Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.
No catálogo KEV1,769
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,700
Distribuição · última janela
- Crítica5,659
- Alta21,892
- Média21,295
- Baixa2,178
Filtros
Janela
Severidade
Filtros
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2026-199364.8 MÉD3.8%
——1The Bluetooth Mesh Access-layer delayable message queue in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/delayable_msg.c shares three intrusive lists (busy_ctx, free_ctx, free_chunks) and one k_work_delayable between two cooperative threads with no synchronization: bt_mesh_delayable_msg_manage() runs on the Bluetooth host RX thread, while delayable_msg_handler() runs on the system workqueue. Both block while the lists are in an intermediate state — the enqueuer in bt_rand(), both in bt_mesh_access_send() — which lets the other context observe torn state. delayable_msg_handler() used the result of sys_slist_get() on busy_ctx without a NULL check, and allocate_delayable_msg_ctx() tested sys_slist_is_empty() and then assumed a separate sys_slist_get() would succeed.
Because CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG and CONFIG_BT_MESH_ACCESS_DELAYABLE_MSG_CTX_ENABLED default to y, every model response to a received mesh message is parked on this queue, so the enqueuer runs as a direct consequence of inbound traffic. A peer that can get access-layer messages accepted by a model (it must hold the NetKey and a bound AppKey, so a legitimate or compromised network member) controls the arrival rate, the size of the elicited responses and the destination address, and thereby controls occupancy of the 4-entry context pool and the 40-entry chunk pool. Exhausting the chunk pool forces bt_mesh_delayable_msg_manage() down the purge path, which sends and releases the only queued message and leaves busy_ctx empty while the delayable work item is still armed; if the enqueuer then yields, the handler runs against the empty list.
The result is a read-modify-write through a NULL-based pointer (pending_msg->fired_time += 10) at a fixed low address on the system workqueue thread. On typical targets that faults, aborting the system workqueue thread — which stops all workqueue-driven functionality, including the mesh timing machinery — or resetting the node, so the impact is loss of availability of the affected node. The write value and address are fixed and no attacker-controlled length or index is involved, so this is not exploitable for memory corruption or code execution. The same unsynchronized window also allowed one message context to be selected and released by two contexts at once, producing duplicated transmissions, duplicated send-completion callbacks and crossed chunk ownership.
The fix serializes every list mutation with a k_spinlock that is never held across a blocking call, makes push_msg_from_delayable_msgs() detach the queue head atomically so a message being sent is on no list, removes the unchecked sys_slist_get() from delayable_msg_handler(), and drops any message that reaches the front of the queue while the stack is suspended or reset.3dCVE-2026-183434.4 MÉD0.3%
——0IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to modify the BOOTP table due to improper authorization.23dCVE-2026-183185.3 MÉD20.2%
——6IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to perform brute-force attacks to obtain credentials due to improper authentication.23dCVE-2026-174875.3 MÉD15.2%
——5IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate user profiles due to the return of distinct error codes during the sign-on process.23dCVE-2026-174845.3 MÉD3.7%
——1IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper access control.23dCVE-2026-1089414.8 MÉD2.2%
——1A vulnerability was identified in Linketic CityGaussian up to 2.0. This affects the function parse_cfg_args of the file internal/utils/common.py of the component Sidecar Parsing. The manipulation of the argument cfg_args leads to code injection. The attack can only be performed from a local environment. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.22dCVE-2026-1089406.5 MÉD53.0%
——16A vulnerability was found in EricLBuehler Mistral.rs up to 0.9.3. The affected element is the function calibration_apply of the file mistralrs-server-core/src/handlers.rs. Performing a manipulation of the argument save_cimatrix results in path traversal. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 0.9.4 is sufficient to fix this issue. The patch is named 8c81056712709b4845ec6d9531e4d35bab4a367c. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.24dCVE-2026-1089395.3 MÉD41.2%
——12A vulnerability has been found in EricLBuehler mistral.rs up to 0.9.3. Impacted is the function is_global_ip of the file mistralrs-server-core/src/media_source.rs. Such manipulation of the argument ip leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 0.9.4 is recommended to address this issue. The name of the patch is cfb8c6a0c42361dc4579a9110b54d339c255b9fd. The affected component should be upgraded.23dCVE-2026-938928.1 ALT20.4%
——6IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.24dCVE-2026-938917.6 ALT26.2%
——8IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.24dCVE-2026-928325.1 MÉD0.1%
——0IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.24dCVE-2026-854578.1 ALT30.0%
——9IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.21dCVE-2026-844187.4 ALT3.1%
——1IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.23dCVE-2026-821109.6 CRÍ44.1%
——13IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of pathname during a path traversal.23dCVE-2026-821088.8 ALT39.9%
——12IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.23dCVE-2026-821039.6 CRÍ23.7%
——7IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor.23dCVE-2026-821019.6 CRÍ36.1%
——11IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability.23dCVE-2026-820968.8 ALT37.1%
——11IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.23dCVE-2026-757827.8 ALT1.1%
——0IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to a misconfigured PATH environment variable.24dCVE-2026-756216.2 MÉD1.7%
——1IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to excessive permissions assigned to a service account.24dCVE-2026-750957.5 ALT25.1%
——8IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption.24dCVE-2026-750764.3 MÉD6.7%
——2IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the exposure of JavaScript source map files.24dCVE-2026-750635.4 MÉD7.4%
——2IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript due to improper output encoding.22dCVE-2026-750617.5 ALT30.1%
——9IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to write arbitrary files on the system.22dCVE-2026-196278.2 ALT29.3%
——9IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary host files and overwrite certain application files due to improper validation of file paths.22dCVE-2026-196228.8 ALT28.7%
——9IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and escalate privileges due to improper validation of sub-requests.22dCVE-2026-196208.8 ALT27.1%
——8IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access due to improper authentication.22dCVE-2026-185416.4 MÉD3.1%
——1IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.22dCVE-2026-174757.1 ALT12.4%
——4IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to delete folders and applications belonging to other users due to improper functional level access control.22dCVE-2026-1096754.3 MÉD6.2%
——2Frappe Suite before commit 2697564a9c46da6acc614743eaf9915fe5238f4f contains a broken access control vulnerability in the get_mailboxes and get_quota APIs that allows authenticated mail users to access other users' data. Attackers can supply another user's JMAP account ID to read mailbox names, message counts, automation rules with sender addresses, and storage quota usage.20dCVE-2026-1096746.5 MÉD27.2%
——8Frappe ERPNext before 15.98.0 and 16.x before 16.6.0 contains an SQL injection vulnerability in some endpoints caused by missing input validation. Remote authenticated attackers can send specially crafted requests to the affected endpoints to manipulate database queries and extract sensitive information from the database.25dCVE-2026-1096737.3 ALT11.4%
——3Frappe ERPNext before 15.103.0 and 16.x before 16.12.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because the names of certain records are not properly neutralized when rendered on some dashboards, tools, and portals. Authenticated attackers can craft malicious record names that execute scripts in other users' browsers, enabling data access, modification, and token theft, especially against privileged users.24dCVE-2026-1096726.5 MÉD17.5%
——5Frappe ERPNext before 15.118.0 and 16.x before 16.27.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in certain endpoints that fail to enforce proper authorization checks. Authenticated users can query these endpoints to read financial data beyond what their assigned role permits.24dCVE-2026-1096717.3 ALT10.8%
——3Frappe ERPNext before 15.113.0 and 16.x before 16.24.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in a profile field that is rendered without escaping into portal pages. Low-privilege attackers can store malicious script in the field that executes in the browser of any administrator viewing those pages, enabling administrator account takeover.23dCVE-2026-1096705.4 MÉD6.2%
——2Frappe ERPNext before 15.110.0 and 16.x before 16.21.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability caused by record names being rendered without escaping. Attackers with write access to item master data can store malicious script in a record name that executes in the browser of any operator who opens the affected page.20dCVE-2026-1096694.3 MÉD12.0%
——4Frappe ERPNext before 15.110.0 and 16.x before 16.21.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in which certain endpoints fail to enforce proper authorization checks on record status changes. Authenticated low-privileged users can call these endpoints to modify data beyond their permitted role, bypassing intended role-based access restrictions.25dCVE-2026-1096684.3 MÉD8.9%
——3Frappe ERPNext before 15.110.0 and 16.x before 16.21.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in certain endpoints that handle party records, allowing authenticated users to modify data beyond their permitted role. Attackers with low-privileged accounts can send requests to these endpoints to make unauthorized changes to party records.24dCVE-2026-1096678.8 ALT15.9%
——5Frappe ERPNext before 15.111.0 and 16.x before 16.22.0 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in a record-creation endpoint that takes the record type from the request and inserts the record with permission checks disabled. Any authenticated user, including one holding no operational role, can supply a privileged record type to create privileged accounts and take full control of the site.24dCVE-2026-1096666.5 MÉD12.7%
——4Frappe ERPNext before 15.110.0 and 16.x before 16.21.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in certain endpoints that fail to enforce proper permission checks on inventory records. Authenticated users can send requests to these endpoints to modify inventory data beyond what their assigned role permits.23dCVE-2026-1096654.3 MÉD9.0%
——3Frappe ERPNext before 15.108.0 and 16.x before 16.18.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in certain endpoints that fail to enforce proper permission checks. Authenticated low-privileged users can call these endpoints to deactivate master records, modifying data beyond their permitted role.20d