PULSE
FEED
ransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturingransomkrybit reclama a cey-tech.com · CY · Technologyransommetaencryptor reclama a Promantra, Inc. · US · Technologyransomincransom reclama a CIMSA LOGISTICS · US · Transportationransomincransom reclama a HELP Foundation · US · Otherransomincransom reclama a gamechangerwm.com · US · Professional Servicesransomincransom reclama a raymondjames.com · US · Financial Servicesransomthegentlemen reclama a Esri South Africa · ZA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a MEGATRANS · AR · Transportationransomthegentlemen reclama a United Pharmacy · SA · Healthcareransomthegentlemen reclama a Clancy Systems International · US · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Orennia · SE · Energy & Utilitiesransomthegentlemen reclama a City of Humboldt · CA · Government & Defenseransomthegentlemen reclama a Reso Tech Laurentides · CA · Technologyransomthegentlemen reclama a Darr Equipment · US · Manufacturing
CVE Watch413.805 no arquivo completo

Vulnerabilidades exploráveis hoje

413,805na visualização atual

Score único que combina CVSS, presença no KEV e EPSS. Cada CVE com sua própria ficha — timeline da publicação até a exploração ativa.

No catálogo KEV1,779
Novos KEV · 24H0
Exploit Today ≥ 701,707

Distribuição · última janela

  • Crítica
    5,615
  • Alta
    22,524
  • Média
    20,884
  • Baixa
    2,135
Filtros
Filtros

Janela

Severidade

Filtros

Vulnerabilidades18,681–18,720 · 413,805
CVECVSSEPSSKEVRExploitTítuloMod.
CVE-2022-32275—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2010-3676—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2009-0955—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-1999-0266—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2012-6663—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2012-6151—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2007-1542—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-6490—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-4335—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2007-4586—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-7822—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2020-8868—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2007-2390—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2017-20212—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2010-2119—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2025-49189.8 CRÍ
95.5%
——29An attacker was able to perform an out-of-bounds read or write on a JavaScript `Promise` object. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 138.0.4, Firefox ESR 128.10.1, Firefox ESR 115.23.1, Thunderbird 128.10.2, and Thunderbird 138.0.2.43d
CVE-2019-17626—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2013-0504—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2018-71608.8 ALT
95.5%
——29The Node.js inspector, in 6.x and later is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack which could be exploited to perform remote code execution. An attack is possible from malicious websites open in a web browser on the same computer, or another computer with network access to the computer running the Node.js process. A malicious website could use a DNS rebinding attack to trick the web browser to bypass same-origin-policy checks and to allow HTTP connections to localhost or to hosts on the local network. If a Node.js process with the debug port active is running on localhost or on a host on the local network, the malicious website could connect to it as a debugger, and get full code execution access.35d
CVE-2007-2593—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2017-3059—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-19649—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2009-0255—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2013-45904.3 SEM
95.5%
——29Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 allows attackers to obtain "Tomcat internals" information by leveraging the presence of an untrusted web application with a context.xml, web.xml, *.jspx, *.tagx, or *.tld XML document containing an external entity declaration in conjunction with an entity reference, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue.34d
CVE-2020-11527—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2000-0011—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2000-0202—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2013-1299—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2005-3934—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-0802—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2002-0068—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2023-6304—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-7804—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2019-7825—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2015-2544—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2010-1722—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2004-0888—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2010-4180—
95.5%
——29——
CVE-2025-599349.4 CRÍ
95.5%
——29Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.24d
CVE-2000-0639—
95.5%
——29——